Jaarverslag 2018 ESM (bijlage bij 21501-07,nr.1613) - Hoofdinhoud
Inhoudsopgave
| Officiële titel | Jaarverslag 2018 ESM (bijlage bij 21501-07,nr.1613) |
|---|---|
| Documentdatum | 26-06-2019 |
| Publicatiedatum | 27-06-2019 |
| Nummer | 2019D27678 |
| Kenmerk | 21501-07, nr. 1613 |
| Externe link | originele PDF |
| Originele document in PDF |  |
2018
ANNU
AL REPOR
T
EUROPEAN
ST
ABILI
TY
MEC
HANISM 2018 Annual Report
Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions
about the European Union
Freephone number (*):
00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11
(*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you).
Photo credits:
© European Stabiity Mechanism, Steve Eastwood: pages 6, 17, 35, 37, 38, 40, 44, 51, 52, 55, 57, 58, 63, 66, 71, 73, 75
Portrait photos: pages 14, 17, 20, 23, 36, 39, 42, 46, 50, 51, 54, 56, 58, 63, 66, 67-70, 72, 73 supplied by national Finance Ministries
PRINT ISBN 978-92-95085-59-6 ISSN 2314-9493 doi:10.2852/53320 DW-AA-19-001-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-95085-58-9 ISSN 2443-8138 doi:10.2852/427922 DW-AA-19-001-EN-N
More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu).
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019
© European Stability Mechanism, 2019
Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
2018 Annual Report
Contents
5 ESM at a glance
7 Message from the Managing Director
9 Letter of transmittal to the Board of Governors
10 2018 year in review
11 The international role of the euro
01 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS
13 Macroeconomic and financial environment
18 December 2018 Euro Summit marks new chapter for the ESM
21 Programme country experiences
23 Greek programme achievements
32 Resilience of countries that benefited from financial assistance
02 ESM ACTIVITIES
37 Processing the financial transactions of the ESM
39 ALM and Lending activities
42 Funding and Investor Relations
46 Major rating agencies affirm ESM’s high rating position
47 Investment and Treasury
50 Risk and Compliance
55 Focus on the Risk and Control Self-Assessment (RCSA) process
56 ESM: committed to public service, transparency, and accountability
03 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND ORGANISATION
59 The ESM financial assistance toolkit
61 Governance
62 Governance structure
63 Board of Governors
67 Board of Directors
70 Board of Auditors
72 Internal control framework
74 ESM organisational structure
04 FINANCIAL REPORT
78 Balance sheet
79 Off-balance sheet
80 Profit and loss account
81 Statement of changes in equity
82 Statement of cash flows
83 Notes to the financial statements
05 EXTERNAL AUDITOR’S REPORT ON THE 2018 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
06 REPORT OF THE BOARD OF AUDITORS ON THE 2018 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 5 | 5
ESM at a glance
The European Stability Mechanism (ESM) is a crisis resolution mechanism established by the euro area countries. Since its inauguration in October 2012, the Luxembourg- based ESM has provided financial assistance to ESM Members experiencing or threatened by severe financing problems to safeguard the financial stability of the euro area as a whole and of its member states. Euro area leaders decided to give the ESM, an intergovernmental institution, a stronger role in financial assistance programmes and agreed to changes in its toolkit.
The leaders’ agreement foresees that:
ƒ The ESM will provide a backstop for the Single Resolution Fund (SRF), a key element of banking union that is designed to resolve financial problems at systemic banks in an orderly fashion; ESM’s backstop loans will be granted as a last resort and be fiscally neutral over the medium term;
ƒ The ESM will take a stronger role in designing, negotiating, and monitoring future programmes, in full respect of the European Commission and European Central Bank (ECB) competences;
ƒ The ESM’s precautionary instruments will be reviewed to make them more effective.
For more information on the new mandates, see ‘December 2018 Euro Summit marks new chapter for the ESM’.
The ESM raises funds by issuing debt instruments, which are purchased by institutional investors. The proceeds enable the ESM to provide its Members with the following types of financial assistance:
loans to cover their financing needs;
loans and direct equity injections to recapitalise financial institutions;
primary and secondary debt market purchases of Members’ national bonds;
credit lines to be used as precautionary financial assistance.
More information about the ESM in general can be found on our website: www.esm.europa.eu.
Note: The ESM 2018 Annual Report contains the audited financial statements as at 31 December 2018, together with the report of the external auditor in respect of their audit concerning these financial statements, and the report of the Board of Auditors in respect of these financial statements. The description of ESM policies and activities covers the 2018 financial year, except when stated otherwise. The information related to the composition of the Board of Governors and Board of Directors reflects their composition as of 7 May 2019. The economic development report (Chapter 1) includes certain information available up to 1 May 2019, but all historic financial data there set out is limited to the period to 31 December 2018.
“The ESM reached two milestones in 2018: Greece exited its ESM programme successfully and European leaders decided on a package of measures to deepen Economic and Monetary Union, including steps to strengthen the ESM.”
KLAUS REGLING
Managing Director European Stability Mechanism
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 7
Message from the
Managing Director
The ESM reached two milestones in 2018: Greece exited its ESM programme successfully in August after more than eight years under financial assistance, and the Euro Summit decided in December on a package of measures to deepen Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), including steps to strengthen the ESM.
Greece’s successful programme exit followed those of Ireland, Spain, Cyprus, and Portugal. With loans of almost €204 billion from the ESM and its temporary predecessor, the EFSF, Greece has benefited from the largest financial assistance in modern history, making the rescue funds the country’s biggest creditor by far. Thanks to our loans’ low interest rates and long maturities, Greece saved €13 billion in its 2018 budget alone compared to market financing, calculations for this Annual report show. This amount represents 7% of Greek GDP. Similar savings will be repeated over many years to come. This is an unprecedented act of solidarity by the other euro area member states with Greece.
In a further gesture of support, the Eurogroup approved medium-term debt relief measures for Greece in June. They concern an abolition of step-up interest rate margins, a further 10-year deferral of interest and amortisation, and a 10-year extension of the maximum weighted average maturity, all related to EFSF loans. We estimate that this will lead to a cumulative reduction of Greece’s debt-to-GDP ratio of around 30 percentage points until 2060. We also expect Greece’s gross financing needs to fall by around eight percentage points over the same time horizon. As a result of these medium-term measures, Greece will not start repaying most of its EFSF loans before 2033, and the new weighted average loan maturity has been extended to 42.5 years. All of this comes on top of sizeable short-term debt relief measures implemented in 2017 for Greece.
Also for the longer term, Greece received reassurance on its debt sustainability. The euro finance ministers committed to reviewing in 2032 whether additional debt measures are needed to respect Greece’s agreed gross financing needs targets. There is also a contingency mechanism on debt, which could be activated should Greece be hit by an unexpectedly adverse scenario. If the Eurogroup were to activate the mechanism, measures could include further re-profiling, and capping and deferral of interest payments to the EFSF to the extent needed to meet the gross financing needs targets.
In return, Greece pledged to stick to the reforms agreed under the programme, among them to maintain a primary surplus of 3.5% until 2022 and to comply with EU rules, particularly related to fiscal and economic policies.
In an effort to continuously improve the work of the ESM, Mário Centeno, the Chairperson of the ESM Board of Governors, and I have asked former European Commission Vice President Joaquín Almunia to lead an independent evaluation of the financial assistance to Greece. We are looking forward to an interim report of his work in December 2019 and to the opportunity to consider his results at the ESM Board of Governors’ Annual Meeting in June 2020.
With Greece’s programme exit, the ESM accomplished its immediate mission to overcome the euro crisis and to safeguard financial stability in the euro area by providing loans in exchange for economic policy reforms. The ESM can now focus on implementing the December Euro Summit decisions to be better prepared for the next crisis.
The year-end summit decisions illustrate both Europe’s determination to make the euro area more resilient and the political will to move EMU forward even without the threat of an existential crisis. The decisions also show that the ESM has become a key pillar in the currency union’s institutional architecture.
According to the Euro Summit, the ESM receives a broadened mandate and becomes the backstop for bank resolution within banking union. This backstop will only be activated if the funds of the Single Resolution Fund are insufficient to resolve a bank in crisis. To repay its loans to the ESM within three-to-five years, the SRF would receive levies from European banks. As is the case with all country programmes, there will be no transfer of taxpayers’ money. By 2024 at the latest, the backstop will be fully operational.
The ESM will also play a stronger role in future programmes in close cooperation with the European Commission and in full respect of its prerogatives according to the EU Treaty. Together with the Commission, the ESM will design, negotiate, and monitor future programmes. Building on the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed in April 2018, the ESM and the Commission agreed in November on their future cooperation and the Euro Summit endorsed the agreement. The two institutions will work in tandem, drawing strength from the complementarity of our respective expertise.
Additionally, the Euro Summit decided to make the ESM precautionary credit lines more efficient and easier to use, and to strengthen the role of the ESM in matters of debt sustainability. It is the ESM’s role to take a creditor’s perspective. In the future, the Commission and the ESM will jointly prepare a debt sustainability analysis for programme countries. In addition, when appropriate, and if requested by the Member State, the ESM may facilitate the dialogue between its Members and private investors. This involvement would take place on a voluntary, informal, non-binding, temporary, and confidential basis.
Furthermore, the euro area intends to introduce single limb collective action clauses by 2022 and to include this commitment in the ESM Treaty. These Euro Summit decisions are not intended to lead to more debt restructurings but to more transparency and predictability.
Lastly, the summit mandated the Eurogroup to work in two areas where Member States still have very different views: a common European deposit insurance scheme and a budgetary instrument for convergence and competitiveness of the area.
We know that a European deposit insurance is important for the completion of banking union. Views diverge on the preconditions needed, but it would ultimately be very beneficial to overcome the fragmentation of Europe’s financial markets. Also, the past ESM and EFSF programmes would have been much smaller if we had had a common deposit insurance.
Regarding the euro area budget, the summit asked the finance ministers to work on the design, the modalities of implementation, and the timing of the budgetary instrument for convergence and competitiveness. This is a positive step as it will encourage structural reforms and strengthen competitiveness in the euro member states. This will enhance the resilience of the monetary union as a whole.
I also see good economic reasons to talk about fiscal instruments for macroeconomic stabilisation. There are several proposals on the table that would not lead to permanent transfers. Following the European elections, I would welcome broadening the discussion. We could also consider a revision of the fiscal rules, to make them more effective, and a stabilisation facility at the euro area level operating outside a crisis situation. But this is beyond the current political mandate.
The efforts to deepen EMU and enhance its resilience, together with the completion of banking union and capital markets union, would also help to strengthen the international role of the euro . A more balanced multipolar currency system that comprises the US dollar, the euro, the renminbi, and perhaps one or two other currencies would, over time, improve the functioning of the international monetary system and protect Europe’s interests.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 9
Letter of transmittal to the
Board of Governors
13 June 2019
Dear Chairperson,
I have the honour of presenting to the Board of Governors (BoG) the annual report in respect of the financial year 2018, in accordance with Article 23(2) of the By-Laws of the European Stability Mechanism (By-Laws).
The annual report includes a description of the policies and activities of the European Stability Mechanism during 2018. It also contains the audited financial statements as at 31 December 2018, as drawn up by the Board of Directors (BoD) on 26 March 2019 pursuant to Article 21 of the By-Laws, which are presented in Chapter IV. Furthermore, the report of the external auditor in respect of the financial statements is presented in Chapter V and the report of the Board of Auditors (BoA) in respect of the financial statements in Chapter VI . The independent external audit was monitored and reviewed by the BoA as required by Article 24(4) of the By-Laws.
Klaus Regling
Managing Director
1 0 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
2018 year in review
08.02
ESM BoD approves Spanish request to make two voluntary early repayments towards its ESM loan, totalling €5 billion.
22.03 EFSF BoD elects Austrian Harald Waiglein as new
Following the third review of its programme, the BoG Chairperson.
approves the Supplemental MoU with Greece.
Five days later the BoD approves a €6.7 billion loan tranche and the release of a €5.7 billion disbursement. 29.06
The Euro Summit agrees to further strengthen the ESM.
01.08
Following the fourth review of its programme, the BoG approves the Supplemental
MoU with Greece. The BoD approves a €15 billion loan tranche to the country. 20.08
Greece officially concludes and exits from its three-year ESM financial assistance programme, finalising the last of the rescue funds’ programmes entered into since 2012.
20.09
ESM BoD approves an additional €3 billion early repayment from Spain.
08.10
BoG appoints Irena Petruškevičienė and Noel Camilleri as members of the BoA, each for a non-renewable three-year term.
10.10
Third High-level Dialogue of Regional Financing Arrangements, co-organised by the ESM, takes
place in Bali, Indonesia, on the margins of the annual meeting of the International Monetary Fund and the 16.10 World Bank Group. ESM issues $3 billion in bonds, its second deal in the US dollar market.
14.11
ESM and European Commission agree on a joint position for their future cooperation in anticipation of
the broadening of the ESM’s mandate. 22.11
EFSF BoD approves the implementation of a set of medium-term debt relief measures for Greece.
14.12
Euro Summit endorses a package of proposals on deepening EMU, including strengthening the ESM in full respect of the Commission and ECB competences as laid down in the EU legal framework. This includes providing a backstop to the SRF; a stronger role for the
ESM in designing, negotiating, and monitoring future programmes; a joint position on future cooperation between the European Commission and the ESM;
improving the effectiveness of ESM precautionary credit lines; and greater involvement in debt sustainability issues.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 7 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 1 | 1 1
The international role of the euro
Public debate and market interest in the international role of the euro rose in 2018, partly in response to a more sceptical attitude of the US towards the established multilateral system. Some observers have argued that the international monetary system could become more multipolar, where next to the dollar, the euro and the renminbi play a more significant role, thereby making the system more balanced.
The European Commission, some central bank officials, and the ESM have all recently addressed the matter. 1 In December 2018, the Euro Summit encouraged further work, taking note of a related European Commission communication. 2 The summit adopted an agenda to deepen monetary union and to strengthen the ESM, both pre-conditions to strengthening the international role of the euro. Another important step is to further enhance financial market integration.
Given the topic’s relevance, it was an appropriate time for the ESM to ask its Governors, the 19 euro area finance ministers, to share their views on the subject. You will read their individual perspectives throughout these pages.
The euro is the world’s second-most important currency, although its role suffered during the European sovereign debt crisis. About 20% of allocated foreign currency reserves are held in euros, and the common currency was used in over 30% of global payments in 2017. 3
There are several structural factors that explain why the euro is trailing the US dollar on an international scale, which can be addressed by pushing ahead with the December 2018 agenda to deepen monetary union. Euro-denominated financial markets are smaller than those denominated in US dollars, 4 and European markets are also more fragmented. Without more integrated and liquid financial markets, it will be challenging for the euro to play a stronger role in the global currency system than that commensurate with its share in world trade.
When reflecting on the euro’s international role, the ESM Governors made important points. For some ministers, a strengthened international euro role is a matter of sovereignty and one that provides better protection for Europe. Others insist that work on the resilience of monetary union is the key as it is market participants who decide on a currency’s use. Most shared the view that deepening Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), and completing both banking union and capital markets union, would contribute to a stronger international role for the euro. This view is also shared by many international investors.
1 European Commission (2018) ,’President Jean-Claude Juncker’s State of the Union address
2018’, 12 September 2018. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-18-5808_en.htm ; ECB (2019), ’The euro’s global role in a changing world: A monetary policy perspective‘, 15 February 2019. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2019/html/ecb.sp190215~15c89d887b.en.html ; ESM (2018), ’The future of the Economic and Monetary Union and the role of the ESM‘, Speech, 28 November 2018. https://www.esm.europa.eu/speeches-and-presentations/future-economic-andmonetary-union-and-role-esm-speech-klaus-regling
2 European Commission (2018), ‘Towards a stronger international role of the euro’ 5 December 2018: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/com-2018-796-communication_en.pdf
3 International Monetary Fund COFER and SWIFT data, cited in ECB: The international role of the euro,
Interim report, June 2018. 4 The outstanding stock of US dollar-denominated fixed income securities, for example, is more than oneand-a-half
times the stock of euro-denominated fixed income securities. And for safe assets (sovereign and SSA bonds rated AA- or above), the contrast is even more striking, as US-dollar denominated bonds account for over 70% of the outstanding stock, according to ESM estimates based on Bloomberg data.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 3
01 Economic developments
Macroeconomic and financial environment
01
The euro area economy continued to grow in 2018, Figure 1 albeit at a slower pace than in 2017, in line with the World economic activity and exports
maturing global economic cycle. Global growth decelof goods and services eration is reflected in the slowdown of both advanced (y/y growth, in %)
economies and emerging markets. Still, the euro area 6
economy is supported by improvements in labour 5
markets, the accommodative monetary stance, and
the available fiscal space in some countries. These 4 fundamentals should support a gradual adjustment to 3
weaker global activity. The outlook remains positive,
but the overall balance of risks tends to the downside 2
due to trade disputes, Brexit, and geopolitical tensions. 1
0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Euro area economic performance moderates World GDP volume World exports of goods
and services, volume
After the peak of economic growth in 2017, euro area Source: European Commission forecast-Autumn 2018 growth slowed, following the cyclical downturn of the global economy. In addition to a maturing cycle, trade disputes and Brexit have set a less dynamic path for
global trade that, starting from 2018, is expected to Figure 2 converge with lower world gross domestic product Euro effective exchange rate (GDP) growth (Figure 1). Oil prices continued to fall (Group of 19 countries, Q1/1999=100)
while the euro exchange rate (Figure 2) remained 105 broadly stable in nominal terms. US growth held up
on the back of fiscal stimulus, but its impact is fading, 100
adding to the downside risks for the euro area. 95
Euro area GDP growth eased to 1.8% in 2018 after 90
expanding by 2.4% in 2017. Apart from weaker external
demand, some temporary factors affecting the 85
car industry in the second half of 2018 contributed to
the overall deceleration. 80 2015 2016 2017 2018
Nominal effective exchange rate Real effective exchange rate (consumer price index) Real effective exchange rate (producer price index) Real effective exchange rate (gross domestic product deflator)
Source: European Central Bank 1 4 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
The composition of euro area GDP also reflects the Figure 4
weaker global environment (Figure 3). After sizeable Real gross domestic product growth in 2018 (in %)
positive contributions in 2017 and the first half of
2018, net export contribution to growth turned neg 9
ative. This impact is partly offset by the build-up of 8
inventories mostly seen in the third quarter and to 7 6
a great extent related to the abovementioned one 5
off factors. Both investment and total consumption 4
remained robust pointing to improvements in the 3 business climate and labour market recovery fol 2 lowed by considerable wage increases. 1
0
IT BE FR DE
The slowdown appears to be synchronised, with all EL ea PT ES AT NL
FI LU LT EE CY SK LV SI MT IE
large euro area countries recording more moderate o ar Eur
growth rates (Figures 4 and 5). While countries dif
Note: EFSF/ESM programme countries in yellow.
fered noticeably in their cyclical position and labour Source: European Commission Economic Forecast-Autumn 2018 market improvements, the synchronised slowdown could also delay further convergence of euro area members. Figure 5 Real gross domestic product growth for selected
Figure 3 countries Contributions to real gross domestic (y/y growth in %, quarterly data)
product growth (y/y growth in %, contributions in percentage points) 5
4
3.5 3 3.0 2 2.5 1 2.0 0 1.5 -1 1.0 -2 0.5 -3 0.0 -4
-0.5
-1.0 v 12 v 13 v 14 v 15 v 16 v 17 v 18
-1.5 Mar 12 Jul 12 No Mar 13 Jul 13 No Mar 14 Jul 14 No Mar 15 Jul 15 No Mar 16 Jul 16 No Mar 17 Jul 17 No Mar 18 Jul 18 No
Q1 15 Q2 15 Q3 15 Q4 15 Q1 16 Q2 16 Q3 16 Q4 16 Q1 17 Q2 17 Q3 17 Q4 17 Q1 18 Q2 18 Q3 18 Q4 18 Germany Spain France Italy Euro area
Net exports Inventories and valuables Source: Eurostat
Investment Government consumption Private consumption Real gross domestic product growth
Source: Eurostat
“More action is needed to strengthen the international role of the euro. There are short-term measures we can take, but nothing replaces the credibility boost that completing our Economic and Monetary Union would produce. This would support our economies, protect our social model, and make Europe’s voice heard across the world.”
MÁRIO CENTENO
Minister of Finance, Portugal, Chairperson of the ESM Board of Governors
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 5
Euro area inflation reached a six-year high in 2018, Fiscal balances in the euro area continued improving averaging 1.7% over the year, up from 1.5% in 2017 in 2018 in an environment characterised by favour(Figures 6 and 7). The slight upswing was mostly able borrowing conditions (Figure 8). Low financing driven by the energy component given the recovery in costs and cyclical conditions helped governments to oil prices. Core inflation, measured as headline inflacompensate for the lack of improvement in structural tion excluding unprocessed food and energy prices, balances, particularly for countries with high levels marginally accelerated to 1.2% from 1.1% in 2017. of debt. Overall, debt dynamics at the euro area level Inflation expectations rose over the year, supported by remained favourable as the debt-to-GDP ratio continthe oil price recovery and broad-based wage accelerued its decline (Figure 9). ation among euro area member states, which should
support core inflation in the future. Figure 8
Euro area budget balances
Figure 6 (in % of GDP)
Contributions to harmonised index of consumer 3
price inflation rate 2 01
(y/y inflation in %, contributions in percentage points) 1 0
-1
2.8 -2 2.4 -3
2.0 -4 -5
1.6 -6
1.2 -7 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
0.8 Government balance Government primary balance 0.4 Structural balance Structural primary balance 0.0 Note: Shaded area=forecast
-0.4 Source: European Commission Economic Forecast-Autumn 2018 -0.8
-1.2
Dec 15 Feb 16 Apr 16 Jun 16 Aug 16 Oct 16 Dec 16 Feb 17 Apr 17 Jun 17 Aug 17 Oct 17 Dec 17 Feb 18 Apr 18 Jun 18 Aug 18 Oct 18 Dec 18 Figure 9 Food, alcohol, and tobacco Energy Euro area government debt Non-energy industrial goods Services (in % of GDP)
Headline harmonised 96 index of consumer prices 94
Source: Eurostat 92
90 88 86
Figure 7 84
Harmonised index of consumer price inflation rates 82 80
in 2018
(in %) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
4.0 Note: Shaded area=forecast
3.5 Source: European Commission Economic Forecast-Autumn 2018
3.0 2.5
2.0 1.5
1.0 0.5
0.0
IE CY EL FI IT PT NL ea ES T M DE SI LU AT FR BE LT SK LV EE
o ar Eur
Note: EFSF/ESM programme countries in yellow.
Source: Eurostat
1 6 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
The ECB’s monetary policy normalisation, by tapering Euro area heads towards a soft landing in line its net asset purchases, proceeded smoothly in 2018, with a maturing global cycle
but the global slowdown and US Federal Reserve’s dovish monetary policy response led markets to The euro area is expected to lose some momentum expect a more cautious monetary policy tightening in line with global trade and output trends (Figure 12), from the ECB going forward after it announced a new but fundamentals should sustain domestic demand, series of targeted longer-term refinancing operacushioning somewhat the effects of the global trade tions. While the euro weakened and German bund slowdown. The ECB’s still accommodative moneyields declined (Figure 10), sovereign credit spreads tary policy, the potential use of fiscal stimulus by ( Figure 11) widened to various degrees across the countries with fiscal space, the strong labour market euro area. Market volatility resurfaced, fuelled by conditions in some countries, and wage acceleration idiosyn cratic risks, such as Brexit and policy uncercould strengthen domestic demand in the coming tainty in Italy, but these challenges remained conperiod. Still, labour market shortages could cap euro tained and did not become systemic. Against this area growth. Moreover, increases in compensation backdrop, countries that had previously undertaken per employee may pose challenges for countries with adjustment programmes remained resilient and low productivity gains, as post-crisis competitiveness retained stable market access. For more informagains may erode. Overall, therefore, risks to the euro tion on this topic, see ‘ Resilience of ex-programme area growth outlook have moved to the downside. countries and limited contagion ’. Uncertainties relate to global trade disputes, Brexit negotiations, the possibility of a US slowdown, and
Figure 10 other political risks. German bond yields and the euro exchange rate The outlook for inflation also shows risks to the
0.8 1.26 downside. The capacity of corporates to pass higher 0.7 1.24 energy and wage input costs to final consumer prices 0.6 1.22 is diminishing. The latest oil price decline, together 0.5 1.20 with the global slowdown and the low pass-through
0.4 1.18 of wages to final prices, increased downside risks for 0.3 1.16 inflation looking forward (Figure 13).
0.2 1.14
0.1 1.12
0.0 1.10 Figure 12
8 8 Euro area real gross domestic product growth
r 18
eb 18 eb 18 y 18 y 1 v 18 v 1 ug 18 ug 18 forecast
29 Dec 17 16 Jan 18 01 F 19 F 07 Ma 23 Mar 18 10 Apr 18 26 Apr 18 14 Ma 30 Ma 15 Jun 18 03 Jul 18 19 Jul 18 06 A 22 A 07 Sep 18 25 Sep 18 11 Oct 18 29 Oct 18 14 No 30 No 18 Dec 18 (in %)
German 10-year government EUR/USD exchange
bond yields, in % rate, right-hand scale 4
3 Source: Bloomberg 2
1 0
-1
Figure 11 -2 10-year sovereign credit spreads of selected euro -3 area member states vs Germany -4 (in basis points) -5
350 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
300 Note: Shaded area=forecast
Source: European Commission Economic Forecast-Winter interim
250 forecast 2019
200
150
100
50
0
n 18 n 18 eb 18 eb 18 eb 18 y 18 y 18 y 18 n 18 ug 18 ug 18 v 18 v 18 v 18
29 Dec 17 10 Ja 22 Ja 01 F 13 F 23 F 07 Mar 18 19 Mar 18 29 Mar 18 10 Apr 18 20 Apr 18 02 Ma 14 Ma 24 Ma 05 Ju 15 Jun 18 27 Jun 18 09 Jul 18 19 Jul 18 31 Jul 18 10 A 22 A 03 Sep 18 13 Sep 18 25 Sep 18 05 Oct 18 17 Oct 18 29 Oct 18 08 No 20 No 30 No 12 Dec 18 24 Dec 18
France Italy Spain Portugal Ireland
Source: Bloomberg 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 7
“Although the euro is the second international currency, the crisis and recent tensions demonstrate that a strengthening of the international role of the euro is warranted. Delivering on Economic and Monetary Union and capital markets union is crucial. Creating a stable economic and financial environment will better protect European citizens and businesses and contribute to higher global growth.”
ALEXANDER DE CROO
Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Finance and Development Cooperation, Belgium, ESM Governor
01
Figure 13
Euro area inflation forecast While the US Federal Reserve paused its tightening
(in %) cycle, monetary policy normalisation in Europe is
expected to continue at a very gradual pace. In the
4.0 first half of 2019, markets focused on the ECB’s new
3.5 series of targeted longer-term refinancing operations,
3.0 and subsequently attention may shift to the outlook
2.5 for policy rates. Liquidity provision and the potential
2.0 for new monetary policy tools may also come under
1.5 market scrutiny. Against this backdrop, sovereign
1.0 credit spreads will most likely be driven by country
0.5 specific factors, including markets’ perception of
0 political risks. Nevertheless, progress on EMU deep
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 ening can mitigate the risk of unwarranted financial market volatility.
Note: Shaded area=forecast
Source: European Commission Economic Forecast-Winter interim forecast 2019
1 8 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
December 2018 Euro Summit marks new chapter for the ESM
In December, the Heads of State or Government endorsed a package of reforms to The Euro Summit reinforce the resilience of the euro area. The measures included enhancing the ESM’s endorsed a package of role, as well as a commitment to work on completing banking union and designing
measures to deepen a budgetary instrument for convergence and competitiveness for the euro area coun EMU, assigning the tries. The agreement on the ESM’s future built upon the recognition of its effective
ESM a stronger role in ness in providing stability support to euro area members and on the understanding safeguarding financial reached between the European Commission and the ESM on their future cooperastability. tion. This marks an important milestone in the institution’s further development.
The package of proposals included a Term sheet on ESM reform, agreed by the euro area finance ministers at their December Eurogroup meeting, and reproduced in full:
Term sheet on the European Stability Mechanism reform 4 December 2018
The European Stability Mechanism (ESM) has played a key role in crisis management by providing timely and effective stability support to euro area member states in order to safeguard the financial stability of the Euro Area as a whole and of its Member States. The ESM will be further developed to strengthen the resilience and crisis resolution capacities of the euro area. The ESM will notably take a stronger role in the design, negotiation and monitoring of financial assistance programmes and will provide a backstop for the Single Resolution Fund (SRF), in full respect of the Commission and ECB competences as laid down in the EU legal framework. The Commission and the ESM, within their respective competences and according to the modalities agreed in their joint position on future cooperation, will follow and assess macroeconomic and financial risks as well as debt sustainability. The Commission and the Managing Director of the ESM will sign the MoU detailing the conditionality. Conditionality remains an underlying principle of the ESM Treaty and all ESM instruments, but the exact terms need to be adapted to each instrument.
Common backstop to the SRF
At the latest by the end of the transition period the common backstop will be established. The ESM will provide the common backstop to the SRF in the form of a revolving credit line. The terms of reference on this backstop are attached. The size of the credit line will be aligned with the target level of the SRF and will have a nominal cap set above the initial size.
Equivalent treatment will be ensured with non euro area member states participating in the Banking Union, via parallel credit lines to the SRF as well as appropriate governance arrangements.
The backstop will be a last resort instrument subject to the principle of fiscal neutrality in the medium term.
The common backstop will cover all possible uses of the SRF, according to the current regulation, including liquidity provision, subject to, where needed, adequate safeguards, to be discussed in 2019. These safeguards should be without prejudice
to the existing legal competences of the ECB and the SRB. The Direct Recapitalisation Instrument will be replaced by the common backstop at the time it is introduced.
Procedures will be put in place to allow for swift and efficient decision making to fit the timeline of resolution, whilst respecting national constitutional requirements.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 9
Disbursements under the common backstop will be approved by a unanimous decision of the ESM Board of Directors guided by a number of criteria.
The backstop will be introduced earlier provided that sufficient progress has been made in risk reduction to be assessed in 2020. We endeavour to find an agreement on limited Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) changes. Risk reduction requirements will be commensurate with the level of ambition of the common backstop in the transition period compared to that of the steady state.
The political decision on the early introduction of the backstop will be informed by the assessment of the institutions and competent authorities in 2020 including with respect to minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) build-up and trend in non-performing loans (NPLs) reduction. 5 The SRF should be able to access the backstop for banks of all participating Member States.
01
ESM toolkit
The effectiveness of precautionary instruments will be enhanced for countries with sound economic fundamentals, which could be affected by an adverse shock beyond their control.
As regards the precautionary conditioned credit line (PCCL), the eligibility process will be made more transparent and predictable. The existing ex ante eligibility criteria assessing the sound economic and financial performance of the Member State concerned will be clarified.
They will be used in an assessment on the basis of quantitative and qualitative elements related to the economic and fiscal performance of Member States.
As a rule, Member States need to meet quantitative benchmarks (i.e the debt benchmark, the minimum benchmark and a deficit below 3% of GDP 6 ) and to comply with qualitative conditions related to EU surveillance (i.e not experiencing Excessive
Imbalances and not being subject to the Excessive Deficit Procedure).
Sustainability of general government debt will always be needed.
A formal commitment from the eligible beneficiary Member State to continuous adherence to the ex ante eligibility criteria (highlighting the main elements of its policy strategy) would take place at the moment the facility is approved by the BoG in a Letter of Intent (LoI) signed by the beneficiary Member State.
Compliance with the ex ante eligibility criteria will be assessed at least every six months by the competent institutions. In case of non-compliance, access to the funds would be discontinued. Upon the Member State’s request, and in line with ESM decision-making processes, the arrangement can be changed to an enhanced conditions credit line (ECCL) or a full macroeconomic adjustment programme.
5 This assessment will be made against the aim of 5% gross NPLs, and 2.5% net NPLs or adequate provisioning, for all SRB banks and progress thereto. Banks should build up subordinated bail-in buffers steadily in line with the 2024 targets and 2022 intermediate targets. There should be appropriate monitoring by the competent authorities to assess progress. As regards NPLs reduction, competent authorities define individual strategies for the reduction of NPL stocks for relevant banks. In case these aims are not met, Member States will undertake specific efforts also involving their insolvency/debt enforcement regimes to reach these goals in a short period of time.
6 The minimum benchmark is the level of the structural balance providing a safety margin against the
3% Treaty threshold under normal cyclical conditions. It is mainly used as one of three inputs into the calculation of the minimum MTO. The debt benchmark requires a Member State to have a debt to DGP ratio below 60% or a reduction in this ratio of 1/20th per year. The three benchmarks need to be met in the 2 years preceding the request for support.
2 0 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
The ECCL instrument will continue to be available as foreseen in the current ESM guideline. Access to an ECCL shall be open to ESM Members that do not comply
with some of the eligibility criteria required for accessing a PCCL but whose general economic and financial situation remains sound.
As regards the financing terms of precautionary instruments, the margin will be set at 35 bp in case of an extension of maturities, a step-up margin of 50 bp will be
applied.
Once the credit line is drawn, in case of non-compliance with the LoI for the PCCL or with the MoU for the ECCL, which is not due to events outside the control of the government as assessed by the ESM BoD, an additional margin of 50 bps will be applied, which increases by 65 bp after six months, and access to the funds would
be discontinued.
Debt sustainability issues
There is broad support for the need to improve the existing framework for promoting debt sustainability in the euro area. We intend to introduce single limb collective action clauses (CACs) by 2022 and to include this commitment in the ESM Treaty. We also reaffirm the principle that financial assistance should only be granted to countries whose debt is sustainable and whose repayment capacity is confirmed. This will be assessed by the Commission in liaison with the ECB, and the ESM as described in the attached working arrangements. The debt sustainability assessment will be done on a transparent and predictable basis, while allowing sufficient margin of judgement.
Finally, when appropriate and if requested by the Member State, the ESM may facilitate the dialogue between its Members and private investors. This involvement would take place on a voluntary, informal, non-binding, temporary, and confidential basis.
Cooperation between the ESM and the Commission
The ESM and the Commission have also agreed on new modalities of cooperation within and outside financial assistance programmes, in full respect of the EU legal
framework (see joint position on future cooperation between the European Commission and the ESM in annex). This agreement is without prejudice to the role and competences of the ECB as defined in the existing legal framework.
“Twenty years after its introduction, the euro plays an important international role. Since market participants ultimately decide on the use of a currency, it is important to ensure trust in the euro. Increasing the resilience of Economic and Monetary Union, including the deepening of banking union and capital markets union, and strengthening the competitiveness of its member states are key elements in this.”
OLAF SCHOLZ
Federal Minister of Finance, Germany, ESM Governor
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 2 1
Programme country experiences
Ireland
The Irish economy grew strongly in 2018, backed by debt-to-GDP ratio for 2018 was at 64%. However, such a buoyant domestic economic activity. Year-end data ratio may be an imprecise measure of the debt burden
point to a small Exchequer cash surplus for 2018, driven for the economy given that the activities of multi - 01
by over-performing corporate tax receipts. Irish banks national enterprises distort the GDP figures. showed capital and liquidity buffers well above regulatory requirements, but long-term arrears, sectoral changes, Ireland enjoys favourable market access. In 2018, and operational efficiency represent key challenges. The it issued over €17 billion in benchmark bonds with main risks to the economic outlook stem from Brexit, vola weighted average maturity at issuance of 11.8 years, atility related to the activity of multinational companies, and a weighted average yield at issuance of 1.1%. The and an overheating of the economy in the medium-run. National Treasury Management Agency has taken These risks warrant the prudent accumulation throughadvantage of the favourable market conditions brought out the upcoming years of a fiscal capacity. by the ECB’s asset purchases to lengthen the maturity
profile of the debt and to reduce its average interest Real GDP grew at an annual rate of 6.7% in 2018. rate. Buy and sell orders of Irish government bonds were Domestic demand indicators support the evidence of quite balanced during the second half of 2018, accordstrong growth despite distortions from multinational ing to high-frequency indicators, following a spike in corporations. Domestic demand adjusted for the activivolatility in European sovereign bond markets in May. ties of multinationals grew at an annual rate of 4.5% dur Strong economic growth, sizeable cash buffers, and ing the year, driven by private consumption and domesan ‘A’ credit rating support Ireland’s favourable market tic components of investment. 7 The latest release for access. unemployment was 5.6% in February. The strong labour market and the still tight housing market represent Irish banks showed signs of recovery in an improving supply- side constraints that could hamper future growth. operating environment. Banks’ active engagement
in portfolio sales and restructuring helped to reduce Consumer price inflation (CPI) remained subdued in non-performing loans (NPLs). However, the share of 2018 despite robust internal demand and sustained mortgages in long-term arrears is still sizeable. NPL employment growth. Goods prices are the main drag resolution activities contributed to further reducing the on inflation due to weak sterling and an improvement coverage ratio, which compares unfavourably to the in the calculations of some CPI components, although euro area average. Nevertheless, Irish banks’ capital their combined negative effect on prices is less than offand liquidity ratios sit well above the regulatory miniset by increases in housing rents and higher service and mum requirement and provide additional buffers. In the energy prices. long term, increasing competition and sectoral changes
require banks to increase their digital capacity and Ireland’s general government balance was close to balimprove their operational efficiency to stay profitable. ance in 2018, as the Exchequer recorded a small surplus by end-2018. This is mainly due to better-than-expected Under its Early Warning System, the ESM’s monitoring corporation tax receipts. The high reliance of Ireland shows very limited risks for Ireland in meeting its loan on this potentially unstable source of revenues makes service payments. However, Ireland faces a number of the Irish fiscal position relatively vulnerable. Persistent external downside risks and, potentially, an overheatslippages in health sector expenditures could further ing domestic economy approaching full employment. increase the fiscal vulnerability in Ireland. The general These risks warrant the prudent accumulation throughgovernment debt remains above €200 billion and the out the upcoming years of a fiscal capacity and close
monitoring of Ireland’s macroeconomic and financial 7 Final modified domestic demand is composed of private and market dynamics.
public consumption, and modified gross fixed capital formation (excluding aircraft related to leasing and R&D related intellectual property). Change in inventories is excluded given its high volatility.
2 2 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
D 2 0 1 8
D E L U
C N O C
E Greece
M M A
R ES
OG PR M
After Greece exited its ESM programme in August 2018, remaining arrears of €1.4 billion in December 2018 the European Commission activated enhanced surveiland stop creating new ones, Greece has needed to lance for the initial post-programme period and Greece intensify efforts to further modernise its public finanrejoined regular European economic policy coordinacial management system. tion. The economic recovery proceeded for the second year, and Greece outperformed the fiscal target Greek banks meet capital requirements as of endfor the fourth successive year. To secure economic 2018 and liquidity is much improved, but they still sufand financial sector improvements as well as to refer from the highest euro area NPL ratio. Banks have establish market trust, Greece needs to consolidate and broadly met supervisory targets on NPL reduction to continue the reforms pursued during the programme. end-2018 but the targets are becoming increasingly challenging. The government improved the efficiency After the ESM programme ended in August, the of the out-of-court workout law and the electronic Commission activated “enhanced surveillance”, auction platform for asset sales. It also began assessunder which Greece committed to completing all ing how it can further support the banks, for example key reforms adopted under the programme and to through an asset protection guarantee scheme. The specific actions in particular policy areas. To verify Hellenic Financial Stability Fund (HFSF) developed Greece’s progress with its commitments and in line a strategy for the sale of its stakes in the systemic with the enhanced surveillance framework, regular banks in the following years. missions are conducted by the European Commission in liaison with the ECB, in which the ESM participates The Hellenic Corporation of Assets and Participaunder its Early Warning System. The Commission’s tions (HCAP) launched governance and operational resulting quarterly enhanced surveillance reports also reforms of state-owned enterprises, and restructured serve as a basis for euro area members’ bi-annual its real estate management entity. decision to release funds related to the Eurogroup’s June 2018 debt relief measures. For more informa The conclusion of the ESM programme in 2018 and tion on these and related measures, see ‘ Greek pro Greece’s ongoing commitments helped to improve gramme achievements ’. confidence, but challenges to sustainable growth remain. Economic activity rose by 1.9%, driven by net The completion of the third and fourth reviews exports and consumption which compensated for unlocked €21.7 billion of ESM financing between weak investments. General government debt is still March and August 2018. During the three-year prohigh at 181.1% of GDP. The primary surplus reached gramme, the ESM disbursed €61.9 billion of the up-to 4.4% of GDP, according to Eurostat. This implies €86 billion envelope, of which €7 billion was dedicated a primary surplus of 4.3% in programme terms, outto arrears clearance and €11.4 billion to the build-up performing the fiscal target of 3.5% of GDP in 2018, of a cash buffer. Greece’s end-2018 cash resources the fourth year of outperformance. While income of €26.8 billion are sufficient to cover financing needs taxes were robust, lower-than-envisaged public for at least two years. Greece raised €3 billion with investment also boosted the surplus. The authorities a 3-year bond in February, but challenging market legislated a new set of fiscal measures in 2018, canconditions did not favour another issuance in 2018. celling the accelerated recalibration of pensions in In December 2018, the Public Debt Management line with the pension reform of 2016 that was sched Agency announced an up-to-€7 billion 2019 issuance uled to be implemented in 2019. The resulting higher programme. Between January and March 2019, it expenditure reduces the financial scope for growthraised €5 billion through the issuance of a 5-year and enhancing policies. For the future, it will be important a 10-year bond. that Greece combines its post-programme commitments with policies and public investments that sup In 2018, Greece progressed further in clearing its port the economy’s recovery, strengthen market constock of arrears to the private sector. Domestic fidence, and sustain growth. resources and programme funds decreased the overall stock by more than €8 billion since the arrears clearance programme started in June 2016. To pay
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 2 3
Greek programme achievements
In August 2018, Greece exited its third financial assistance programme after a decade of adjustment. During these years, Greece implemented substantial reforms to restore sustainability to public finances, strengthen the banking sector’s resilience, and improve the economy’s competitiveness. During this time, Greece received almost €290 billion in official sector financial assistance and extensive debt relief. To enhance Greece’s long-term growth potential as well as to protect European partners’ large exposure, key programme reform successes must be preserved and prudent policies pursued. Greece’s still existing vulnerabilities and challenging reform targets will require closer post-programme country monitoring than the other euro area postprogramme countries for some time.
01
What has been achieved?
According to the ESM Sovereign Vulnerability Index, 8 Greece’s vulnerabilities have declined substantially since 2009, when the current account deficit exceeded 12% Greece reduced its of GDP and the fiscal deficit 15% of GDP (Figure 14). During the adjustment years, macroeconomic Greece steered its economy to safer waters by improving fiscal and external balances, imbalances after reducing labour costs, and making the banking sector more resilient (Figure 15). broad-based, in-depth
reforms over a decade. Figure 14
Evolution of the vulnerability score
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1
1.9 1.9
2.0 1.6 1.6 1.6
1.5
1.0
2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018
Source: ESM
8 Lennkh, R.A, Moshammer, E., and Valenta, V. (2017), A Comprehensive Scorecard for Assessing
Sovereign Vulnerabilities, ESM, Working Paper 23, April 2017. https://www.esm.europa.eu/publications/ comprehensive-scorecard-assessing-sovereign-vulnerabilities
“The euro is our currency. It is up to us, the ministers, the politicians, to agree and implement what is required for the common currency to be strong and credible. International recognition will follow.”
MARTIN HELME
Minister of Finance, Estonia, ESM Governor
2 4 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Figure 15 Improvement in fiscal and external balance
(in % of GDP)
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Current account balance Government balance excluding bank support
Source: Eurostat
The government fiscal balance vastly improved from a 15.1% of GDP deficit in 2009 Fiscal consolidation to surpluses since 2016. Greece’s fiscal consolidation built upon a policy mix affectpaved
the way to ing both expenditures and revenues, notably through a series of reforms: a balanced budget.
-
•Personal income tax:
Harmonised and broadened tax base, integrated the solidarity surcharge into the personal income tax, and adjusted the tax rates over income groups with increasing progressivity. Further widening of the tax base and reduction of tax
rates is legislated for 2020.
-
•VAT:
Widened the base for the standard tax rate, increased tax rates, and limited reduced VAT regimes.
-
•Pensions:
Lowered main and auxiliary pensions, streamlined eligibility criteria, and harmonised benefit and contribution rules.
-
•Public administration:
Reduced public sector employment, wage and non-wage benefits for public servants, and rationalised the fragmented special wage grids.
-
•Revenue administration:
Established an Independent Authority of Public Revenue, improved tax collection by optimising tax audits, promoting and facilitating the use of electronic payments, and reducing corruption.
-
•Health system:
Rationalised all off-patent drug prices, provided a claw-back mechanism for pharmaceuticals, and required diagnostic and private clinics to comply with
spending ceilings.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 2 5
Figure 16 Nominal unit labour costs
(2010=100)
115
110
105
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65 01
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Greece Spain Portugal Ireland Cyprus
Source: AMECO
Figure 17 Unemployment rate
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Source: Eurostat
Labour market reforms – implemented mainly from 2010 to 2014 – reduced labour costs, removed rigidities, and introduced more flexible wage bargaining schemes Labour costs (Figure 16). Further efforts helped to safeguard the opening clause in collective decreased and the bargaining, allowing for rationalisation of the legal framework on dismissals and country’s wage industrial action, tackling undeclared work, and strengthening active labour market competitiveness policies. These reforms have contributed to job creation in recent years, reducing the improved. unemployment rate from its peak of 27.8% in 2013 to 18.4% at end-2018 (Figure 17).
Since 2008, Greece has lost almost a quarter of its GDP (Figure 18). Over recent years, however, output has stabilised and growth resumed in 2017 and 2018, with Output growth a positive outlook. Looking ahead, key reforms adopted throughout the programmes resumed with will translate into further output gains, supporting investment and exports. Reforms a positive outlook, to improve the business environment focused on product markets and the privatisathanks to productivitytion of public assets and their improved management: boosting reforms.
2 6 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
-
•Product market reforms:
Implemented OECD competition toolkits, removed undue restrictions on regulated professions, facilitated setting up a business, removed barriers to entrepreneurship, simplified and modernised customs procedures and investment licensing procedures. As a result, between 2009 and 2019, Greece rose more than 30% on the World Bank’s ‘starting a business’ indicator, and improved its score in the Global Competitiveness Index since a collapse in 2012. But Greece still ranks quite low versus its euro area peers and should continue implementation efforts.
-
•Privatisations and HCAP:
Privatised a variety of public assets during the programmes to improve the efficiency of the economy, by shifting resources to the private from the public sphere. Concretely, the privatisations reduce the public cost of these assets,
attract foreign investment, and enhance their contribution to the Greek economy. Despite delays in implementation, the privatisation programme has advanced
and will continue during the post-programme period. Beyond this, Greece established a new structure, HCAP, to manage public assets, aiming to improve the quality of public services, enhance the value of public enterprises and real estate, and create revenue streams from them. Reforms in HCAP companies should strengthen Greece’s corporate governance culture, generate funds for domestic investment, and support broader growth.
Figure 18 Real gross domestic product
(Growth in %, contributions in percentage points)
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Changes in inventories Imports Exports Investment Private consumption Public consumption Real gross domestic product growth
Source: Hellenic Statistical Authority (ELSTAT) 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 2 7
Figure 19
Government debt
200 380
180 330
160 280
140 230
120
100 180
80 130
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Government debt Government debt
(in % of gross domestic product) (in € billions, right-hand scale) 01
Source: Eurostat
The Greek banking sector has undergone waves of stress leading to structural change. Four large banks control over 95% of the market as smaller players have Safeguarding banking been merged or liquidated. The four systemic banks have received three rounds of sector stability recapitalisation, 40% of which came from private investors, in 2013 to restore capital was crucial to the adequacy ratios from losses arising from the write-off of Greek government bonds adjustment. and again in 2014 and 2015 to cover losses from the increase in NPLs. The banks also experienced large-scale deposit outflows, which made them reliant on emergency liquidity assistance and even required capital controls to safeguard financial stability. Deposit outflows peaked in 2012 and, after a short period of recovery, peaked again in 2015. Bank deposits stabilised in 2018, enabling the government to relax capital controls gradually. As part of the 2015 recapitalisation, Greece introduced strict rules to reform bank governance. The ongoing reforms are focused on legislation to reduce the NPL ratio, which remains the highest in the euro area, and generate new bank lending to support the recovery. Banks met NPL reduction targets up to the end of 2018, and have reduced the stock of NPLs by more than €20 billion since 2016.
Greece received substantial debt relief both from private creditors in 2012 and from the official sector in 2011, 2012, 2016 and, just before the end of the third Risks to debt programme, in June 2018. All these debt measures have improved debt dynamsustainability have ics (Figure 19). Greece’s debt is expected to remain on a declining path, with gross been broadly mitigated financing needs below 15% of GDP in the medium term and below the 20% threshold with several sets of in the long-term under the baseline scenario. European partners also committed to debt relief measures. providing additional debt relief measures in 2032, if needed and provided that the EU fiscal framework is respected.
Challenges in the post-programme environment
Public finances need to remain on a sustainable path, while incorporating more growth-oriented policies. Already implemented or adopted reforms, such as the Despite programme labour market reform and the lowering of income taxes in combination with a broadreforms, Greece faces ening of the tax base, need to be safeguarded and should not be reversed. In the key challenges to event of court rulings overturning key structural reforms, the recurrent fiscal impact secure sustainable should be largely addressed by reforms within the same policy field. Further struclong-term growth. tural reforms are necessary to boost productivity and enhance competitiveness, complementing the country’s growth strategy. These include reforms to make the economic environment more business friendly, reduce the time needed to resolve legal disputes, further improve the effectiveness of public administration while maintaining it at its current size, and enhance the efficiency of state-owned enterprises’
2 8 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
management. These institutional reforms, coupled with privatisations and improved management of state assets, are critical to attracting both foreign and domestic investment and strengthening future growth. Furthermore, Greece needs to support
banks’ efforts with a comprehensive NPL reduction strategy and improved legislative framework, which will help Greek banks’ ability to lend to the economy and support the economic recovery.
The three financial assistance programmes for Greece
FIRST PROGRAMME I 2010
agreed in 2010
Initial programme amount: €110 billion
Total amount disbursed: €73 billion 2011
Lenders: Euro area countries (except Slovakia) under Greek Loan Facility (GLF) managed by the European Commission: €52.9 billion; IMF: €20.1 billion
Grace period and maturity on GLF loans extended in 2012 to 2012
10 and 30 years from 3 and 5 years, respectively II
SECOND PROGRAMME
agreed in 2012
Interest rate: priced with Euribor 3-month with a margin Initial programme amount: €164.5 billion
lowered to 50 basis points from 300 basis points for GLF; 2013 Total amount disbursed: €153.8 billion
IMF – around 3.96% Lenders: EFSF: €141.8 billion (including €48.2 billion
Key areas of legislated reforms: Pension system, healthcare for bank recapitalisation, €34.6 billion for private system, public financial management, state budget, public sector involvement and bond interest facilities), of sector benefits, labour market, closed professions 2014 which €10.9 billion for bank recapitalisation was not
used by the HFSF and was returned to the EFSF; IMF: €12 billion
THIRD PROGRAMME 2015 Maximum weighted average maturity on EFSF loans initially extended in 2012 to a maximum 32.5 years
agreed in 2015 III from 17.5, finally extended to a maximum of 42.5
Total amount committed: up to €86 billion years in December 2018 Total amount disbursed: €61.9 billion 2016 Interest rate: Guarantee fee cancelled on EFSF
Lenders: ESM: up to €86 billion (including up to €25 billion loans, some interest payments initially deferred by for bank recapitalisation); IMF: €1.6 billion approved in 10 years and then extended to 20 years, up to 2032, principal, but stand-by arrangement did not become and conditional waiver of step up interest rate
effective 2017 margin on certain loan instalments; IMF: between 2.85% and 3.78%
Maximum weighted average maturity: 32.5 years Key areas of legislated reforms: Labour market,
Interest rate for cash disbursements: 1.45% income tax, public administration, social protection, (31 December 2018) 2018 health system, public financial management, Key areas of legislated reforms: VAT, income tax, pension business environment
system, insolvency law, out-of-court debt workout, sales and servicing of loans (NPLs), public revenue collection, product markets, management of state assets, public administration, social protection
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 2 9
Spain
The economy continued growing in 2018, outpacing Developments in Italy slightly affected Spain’s governeuro area peers. However, there was some decelment bond market last year, but spillovers proved to eration, stemming mostly from the external sector. be temporary and contained. After peaking at about Robust domestic demand helped to counterbalance 1.7% in October, 10-year bond yields rallied to around the weak external environment. The general govern 1.4% by year-end, and the spread versus Germany ment deficit dropped below 3% mostly due to favourended the year broadly unchanged compared to endable cyclical conditions. As a result, Spain is expected 2017. Spain retained good market access and raised to exit this year the Excessive Deficit Procedure for the €132 billion in medium- and long-term debt in 2018,
first time since 2009. The Spanish treasury maintained above its initial €126.3 billion target. On the other 01
good market access in 2018 and spillovers from Italhand, Spain reduced its net issuance to €34.3 billion ian developments were limited and temporary. Spanfrom €40 billion. All major rating agencies upgraded ish banks improved profitability and asset quality. The Spain in 2018. ratio of NPLs in Spain continued to decline towards the euro area average. Spanish banks improved profitability and asset quality,
helped by the recovery of the economy and the Spanish GDP grew by 2.6% in 2018, down from 3.0% real estate market. This allowed banks to sell a large in 2017. Domestic demand remained resilient, supamount of non-performing assets during 2018. ported by a strong labour market and favourable Domestic profitability and NPL ratios improved, edgfinancing conditions. Adverse global trade dynamics ing closer to the euro area average. When including resulted in a negative contribution from the external business abroad, Spanish banks have better NPL sector. Spain recorded a current account surplus in and return on equity ratios than the euro area. The 2018 for the sixth year in a row. However, the easing decrease of the overall credit stock in Spain eased, of external trade and an oil price recovery halved the because credit to households increased in the 2018 current account surplus to 0.9% of GDP in 2018. The third quarter for the first time since the crisis. Banks’ international debtor position reached an 11-year low capital buffers are adequate, but capital ratios remain at 77.1% of GDP. Inflation eased to 1.7% from 2.0% in below the euro area average.
2017 driven by a lower contribution from both core and non-core components. Spain created a macro-prudential authority and
empowered Spanish financial supervisors with addi Employment growth remained solid at an average of tional macro-prudential tools. The deadline to divest 2.7% in 2018. The unemployment rate fell to 14.5% Bankia has been extended until December 2021. The by year end, about half of its peak in mid-2013, but merger of Bankia and Banco Mare Nostrum was comstill remained well above the euro area average. The pleted in January 2018. labour market recovery is not complete as unemployment remains high in some segments of the popula Under its Early Warning System, the ESM contintion, including youth. ued to assess positively Spain’s ability to honour
its ESM loan service repayments. In 2018, Spain The general government deficit dropped to 2.5% of made an additional three voluntary repayments of GDP from 3.1% in 2017. Expenditure constraints and €8 billion in total, leaving the ESM outstanding loan at the cyclical upswing supported deficit reduction. €23.7 billion. Early repayments give a strong positive Looking forward, the rejection of the 2019 draft budgsignal to the market about the success of the Spanish etary plan may limit a faster rebalancing of public financial assistance programme and also reinforce finances. The projected economic slowdown will also the position of the ESM, as a mature institution that reduce past cyclical support to the deficit correction successfully supported countries during a crisis. given a high structural deficit. Public debt remains Given high public debt levels, a credible fiscal strategy high but has been on a declining trend over recent and stronger reform momentum are key to reducing years, and stands at 97.1% of GDP in 2018. the vulnerability to adverse shocks going forward.
3 0 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Cyprus
Cyprus regained an investment grade rating in 2018 Cyprus’ banks made important progress, but the thanks to strong economic growth, a prudent fiscal sector remains vulnerable. NPL ratios in the banking policy, and a more resilient financial sector. The windsector declined significantly but remain among the
ing down of Cyprus Cooperative Bank (CCB) alleviated highest in Europe. In 2018, several NPL portfolio sales a major risk to financial stability through the removal took place. Banks advanced in their restructurings but
of a large share of NPLs from outside the banking secsuffer from low profitability and additional provisiontor. This one-off operation, however, adversely affected ing pressures. Furthermore, the government adopted public finances in 2018 and banks still remain burdened a three-pillar strategy to stabilise the sector and by a sizeable NPL stock. Sustained reform momentum reduce NPLs. A crucial pillar was the CCB’s orderly is key to mitigating the domestic and external risks market exit. A domestic competitor acquired parts that could unravel efforts made over recent years. of CCB’s assets and liabilities, while another stateowned entity is gradually reducing the former CCB The Cypriot economy posted another consecutive NPL stock. The second pillar was the strengthening year of strong growth. GDP grew close to 4% in 2018, of the legal framework for insolvency, foreclosures, primarily driven by private consumption. Productivity and asset disposals as well as the adopting of a secugrowth reached the pre-crisis level, reflecting efforts ritisation law. The third pillar, an NPL subsidy scheme to remove barriers in the service market. Economic with pre-defined eligibility criteria, supports borrowers activity helped to reduce the unemployment rate to who face difficulties repaying loans backed by their close to 8%. Yet Cyprus’ economy remains exposed primary residence. to external risks, which may lead to a sharper-thanexpected slowdown of GDP growth that could, for The strong economic performance and the accelerexample, reduce tax receipts and put a halt to the ated clean-up of banks’ balance sheets led to several downward trend of unemployment. rating upgrades. Cyprus now enjoys an investment grade rating from three of the four major agencies, Excluding the CCB transaction and its one-off impact and sovereign bond yields declined substantially duron public finances, a combination of favourable ecoing the year. Taking advantage of these developments, nomic conditions and prudent fiscal policy kept public Cyprus issued a 10-year bond at a yield of 2.4% in finances on the virtuous path. The Commission pro September 2018. Going forward, the high private and jects that the general government surplus should still public debt levels will remain the major burden on the exceed 2.5% of GDP in the medium-term. The govcountry’s creditworthiness. ernment’s support of the CCB partial sale temporarily interrupted the reduction of public debt, which had Despite Cyprus’ solid recovery in recent years, the fallen below 100% of GDP at the end of 2017. The CCB country needs to safeguard the robust fiscal perfordeal will also lead to increased financing needs in the mance to relieve the public debt burden. And while coming years. Cyprus currently faces no major risks the financial sector has made important progress, in meeting its loan service payments. The reform the high level of NPLs remains a key vulnerability for momentum should, however, continue, particularly in banks. areas related to public administration law.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 3 1
Portugal
Portugal’s economy continued growing, with some In 2018, Moody’s was the last of the major rating deceleration stemming mostly from the external secagencies to upgrade Portugal’s rating to investment tor. Domestic demand was the main driver of growth grade taking into account positive economic developsupported by improvements in the labour market. By ments. The 10-year government bond yield returned the end of 2018, fiscal targets were met, supporting to the 1.5%-2% range in the second half of 2018, close reductions in high public debt. This downward debt to the historical lows after the end of its programme, trajectory remains susceptible, however, to lower-thanfollowing some temporary volatility in the first half expected growth dynamics and to a drag on public of the year. The spread to Germany has also been
finances from an ageing population. The health of the broadly stable around 150 basis points. 01
banking system improved, but vulnerabilities remain, such as NPLs above the euro area average and weak Economic growth, higher real estate prices, and profitability. heightened investor interest supported the banking
sector’s continued recovery in 2018. The sector’s prof GDP growth moderated to 2.1% in 2018 from 2.8% itability improved clearly in 2018 compared to previin 2017 due to weaker global and euro area growth. ous years. The NPL ratio dropped significantly by 3.9 Gross capital formation and private consumption percentage points during 2018 to 9.4%. NPL sales were the primary drivers of growth. Net exports’ posand cures have driven the fall in the NPL stock. The itive contribution was interrupted in 2018; import total capital ratio remained constant at 15.2% of riskgrowth outweighed that of exports, given a weaker weighted assets, while the common equity tier 1 ratio contribution from tourism. Labour market developdecreased slightly to 13.2%. The resolution fund is ments were positive with unemployment stabilising liable for future losses of Novo Banco through a capat 6.6% by the end of 2018. Growth is expected to ital contingent mechanism until 2025. In 2018, Novo decelerate gradually between 2019 and 2021, caused Banco made use of it and received its first payments by a moderate slowdown of private consumption and from the resolution fund, which were partially funded business investment. Trade disputes and Brexit could by a state loan. also impact future economic developments.
The continued assessment of Portugal’s repayment The general government budget deficit reached 0.5% capacity suggests no short-term repayment risk of of GDP in 2018, improving beyond the 0.7% target, the outstanding EFSF loan. Portugal’s high public following revenue outperformance and contained debt burden, however, remains an important vulneraexpenditure growth. Both current revenues and pribility and its downward trajectory remains fragile due mary spending grew in line with the annual targets. to weaker growth, fiscal fatigue, and the ageing pop The public debt level declined further to 121.5% of ulation. Prudent fiscal policies and structural reforms GDP in 2018 from 124.8% of GDP in 2017 in response should, therefore, be pursued to boost long-term to improvements in the primary balance. Moreover, growth and increase resilience to shocks. The impact fiscal performance and good market access allowed of expansionary policies, such as the resumption of Portugal to repay early and in full its IMF loan and civil servant promotions and the respective salary further smooth its debt maturity profile, taking advanincreases or minimum wage increases, needs to be tage of the current low rates. Portugal has also comcarefully monitored. While on a consistent downward mitted to an early repayment of the EFSF loan by up trend, the still high level of NPLs in the banking sector to €2 billion from 2020 to 2023 subject to market and weak profitability represent the main challenges conditions and the impact on debt sustainability as in the financial sector looking forward. assessed at the time.
3 2 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Resilience of countries that benefited from financial assistance
A key challenge in the euro area debt crisis was contagion: stress in one member Spillovers, or contagion, state affecting financial markets in another. Tensions spread as investors demanded
raised the cost of the a higher risk premium to hold the government bonds of even those Member States crisis for the euro area. not directly affected by the initial shock. In other words, contagion increased the
costs of the crisis for the euro area.
Given the characteristics of spillovers in a currency union, contagion may also have During the crisis, been driven by markets’ perception of redenomination risk: the risk that a financial in extreme cases, asset is converted from one currency into another of lesser value. In the euro area, investors priced in this could be understood as investors’ perception of the risk that a member state some risk of a country introduces a parallel currency or, in an extreme case, leaves the currency area. This
exiting the euro area. can have implications for other Member States and raise the risk of contagion, but appropriate policies can mitigate this risk.
Former programme countries have become less affected by such external shocks, Since the crisis, demonstrating the results of the reforms carried out during the programmes. however, these fears, Despite volatility in European sovereign debt markets in 2018, the spillovers to and contagion, have former programme countries were relatively limited compared to previous episodes
receded. of market stress. Contagion, and investors’ perceptions of redenomination risk, have been contained.
Contagion risk
One way to look at the extent of contagion is to assess the correlation of asset We compare prices. Methodologies range from simple correlations to more complex econo
2016–2018 metric techniques. 9 Here, we present the simple correlations across sovereign credit to the start of the crisis spreads of selected countries, and two measures of redenomination risk. Due to
period, 2009–2011. data limitations, we focus on three Member States that benefited from financial assistance (Ireland, Spain, and Portugal) and relate them to two major euro area economies that experienced some market volatility over the past two years (France in 2017 and Italy in 2018). We compare two three-year windows: the crisis period (2009–2011) and recent years (2016–2018). 10
Based on this simple exercise, it appears that the sovereign credit spreads of the Over the long-term, three post-programme countries have become less vulnerable to external developpost-programme
ments. Figure 20 depicts the one-on-one (pairwise) correlation of sovereign credit countries’ bond spread spreads of each of the three post-programme countries to France and Italy, respectively,
developments appear as well as between each pair of the three post-programme countries. It shows that to have aligned more the three countries’ spread levels, which reflect country-specific risk premia, demonwith
the country having strated higher correlation with Italy than with France during the crisis period, but that steadier spreads. the correlation with Italy weakened in the recent three-year window. 11 In other words, the spreads of the three countries were more highly correlated with France than with Italy in the recent period. This development can be interpreted as a sign of improved resilience of the three post-programme countries to external developments (Figure 21).
9 See, for example, Martin Hillebrand et al., European government bond dynamics and stability policies, ESM Working Paper 8, 2015. For recent overviews of other measures of contagion by market analysts see, for example, Clemente De Lucia et al., Contagion: Italy and the role of fiscal similarity, Deutsche Bank, 12 November 2018; and Matteo Crimella, Moderate Spillover from Italian Turmoil, Goldman Sachs, 1 June 2018.
10 We use 10-year government bond yields compared to Germany as a benchmark, in line with common practice. We exclude 2012 from the crisis period sample, due to structural breaks such as the Greek private sector involvement and the announcement of the ECB’s outright monetary transactions
instrument. 11 The correlation of sovereign credit spreads between Italy and Portugal over the entire 2016–2018
sample turned marginally negative due to Portugal’s return to investment grade rating in 2017.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 3 3
Figure 20
Correlation of 10-year sovereign credit spreads
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.2
ES PT IE ES PT IE - IE
ES - PT ES - IE PT 01
with France with Italy between post-programme
countries 2009-2011 2016-2018
Notes: We use a relatively long three-year correlation window to ensure more stable results. Data for Ireland is up to
October 2011 in the first window.
Sources: ESM based on Bloomberg data
Figure 21
10-year sovereign credit spreads vs Germany
(in basis points)
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Dec 15 Jun 16 Dec 16 Jun 17 Dec 17 Jun 18 Dec 18
France Italy Spain Portugal Ireland
Source: Bloomberg
Correlations between each pair of the three post-programme countries also declined somewhat compared to the crisis period. This may signal that investors have Investors also appear a greater focus on country-specific factors and differentiate more between these to be focusing more countries. The short-term liquidity and volatility of these markets may still be correon country-specific lated, but it appears that longer-term trends have become more idiosyncratic. This is factors. a welcome development, which can also help to reduce the risk of contagion.
Redenomination risk
The market perceptions of redenomination risk can be derived from financial instruments. De Santis (forthcoming) proposed a redenomination risk measure based 12 Financial instruments on the difference between credit default swaps (CDS) issued in US dollars and those can provide insight into
investor perceptions of 12 Roberto A. De Santis, Redenomination risk, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, forthcoming. the risk a country might
leave the euro area.
3 4 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
in euros, the quanto-CDS. This difference reflects the insurance against the risk of euro devaluation or the introduction of an alternative currency. Under normal circumstances this is close to zero, but it can increase in times of market stress. Market perceptions of country-specific redenomination risk can be computed by taking the country’s quanto-CDS spread relative to the German quanto-CDS, as the sovereign bonds of Germany are rated AAA by credit rating agencies and hence likely considered relatively safe by investors. 13 Yet we note that the use of CDS as an instrument to derive redenomination risk has to be handled with care, given the limited liquidity and transparency of the market. 14
Figure 22 depicts the quanto-CDS spreads for the five countries in our sample since Perceptions of 2009. It shows that the perception of redenomination risk by markets increased such risk declined more broadly during the euro area debt crisis, but that spillovers have dampened substantially after in recent years. Consistent with these observations, a recent academic paper cov
2012. ering a broader sample also finds that redenomination-risk spillovers are muted for most euro area member countries, and the number of those exposed to such risks declined after 2012. 15
Another measure of redenomination risk also corroborates these findings. Gros Post-programme (2018) suggested that market perceptions of redenomination risk could also be 16 countries have been measured by comparing the spread between different CDS vintages: CDS contracts less affected by such issued under the 2003 International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) conshocks
recently. vention did not explicitly refer to redenomination as a credit event, but CDS contracts based on the new 2014 documentation provide stronger protection against such risk. Hence the difference between the two types of contract may point to investors’ concerns about redenomination risk.
17
Figure 22 Quanto-CDS spread, 20-day moving average
(in basis points)
100
80
60
40
20
0
Dec 08 Dec 10 Dec 12 Dec 14 Dec 16 Dec 18
France Italy Spain Portugal Ireland
Note: The chart is based on daily data of 5-year CDS contracts. Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream
13 Germany is the common benchmark for the euro area sovereign debt market, and the use of countries’ quanto-CDS relative to Germany rests on the idea that such a spread would be close to zero if the
market perceives the risk of a euro area break-up as negligible. For further details, see pp. 8 and 15 in Roberto A. De Santis, A measure of redenomination risk, ECB Working Paper 1785, April 2015.
14 With respect to quanto adjustment, one has to be also aware that the majority of traded CDS contracts are USD-denominated and the EUR-denominated contracts are less liquid.
15 Nicola Borri, Redenomination-risk spillover in the eurozone, Economics Letters 174 (2019), pp. 173–178.
16 Daniel Gros, Italian risk spreads: Fiscal versus redenomination risk, VoxEU.org, 29 August 2018. 17 The spread between the ISDA 2003 and 2014 CDS definitions are wider than the quanto-CDS spread, because it captures not only redenomination risk but also provides stronger protection to sovereign bond holders more broadly. Since the CDS 2003 definitions are perceived to be less effective in hedging some risks, such as the redenomination risk, potential buying pressure is concentrated on the 2014 contracts, partly explaining the asymmetry in the relative price movements. Hence caution is warranted when translating these numbers into proportions as to what extent redenomination risk specifically can explain the widening of sovereign credit spreads.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 3 5
Figure 23
Spread between different CDS vintages, 20-day moving average
(in basis points)
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Dec 13 Jun 14 Dec 14 Jun 15 Dec 15 Jun 16 Dec 16 Jun 17 Dec 17 Jun 18 Dec 18 01
France Italy Spain Portugal Ireland
Note: The chart is based on daily data of 5-year CDS contracts.
Source: Thomson Reuters Datastream & CMA Datavision via Haver Analytics
As shown in Figure 23, redenomination risk has been repriced around political events. Although data for this measure have become available only in the last few Other metrics and years, they nonetheless cover events such as the French elections in 2017, and the research results government formation in Italy last year. In line with the pattern shown by simple also support this correlations and the quanto-CDS metric, it appears that the three post-programme conclusion. countries have been less affected by external shocks recently.
3 6 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Drivers of resilience
Overall, spillovers across markets have been reduced since the crisis period, due to Spillovers across European policy initiatives and Member States’ own efforts. markets have declined since the crisis…
First, there are sound macroeconomic reasons for the more limited spillovers: euro …because euro area area fundamentals are now more robust than before and during the debt crisis years, fundamentals are more particularly in former programme countries. Domestic efforts supported by adjustrobust than before the ment programmes reinforced Member States’ ability to weather external shocks. crisis…
Second, the strengthening of the euro area stability framework has been instrumen…while low interest tal in reducing contagion risk. Markets considered the creation of the ESM and the
rates and ECB introduction of the ECB’s outright monetary transactions instrument, for example, as programmes may have key innovations to defuse tensions in sovereign debt markets. 18 Other institutional softened the impact of reforms, such as enhanced banking supervision and fiscal rules, also play a vital role
external shocks. in ensuring the euro area’s stability.
Third, historically low interest rates and the presence of the central bank in government bond markets through the ECB’s public sector purchase programme (PSPP) may also have dampened the impact of external shocks.
The combination of these factors helped to contain the market impact of policy Work towards stronger uncertainties in some Member States, and ensured that these remain idiosyncratic
fundamentals and an rather than systemic. Furthermore, with contagion risk reduced, investors also even more robust EMU seem to have a greater focus on country-specific factors and differentiate accordframework
should ingly. Nevertheless, contagion has decreased but not disappeared, and hence continue to cement there is no room for complacency: it is imperative to continue the work towards these achievements. stronger macroeconomic fundamentals and a more robust institutional framework
by deepening EMU.
18 See, for example, George Cole and Matteo Crimella, EMU Bonds Resilient to Italy Risks...But Watch Growth, Goldman Sachs, 24 October 2018.
“Strengthening the global role of the euro consolidates its global economic and trade influence and reflects the euro area’s political, economic, and financial significance. This is appropriate as our work on completing Economic and Monetary Union continues, including creating a deeper and more stable European financial sector.”
PASCHAL DONOHOE
Minister of Finance and Public Expenditure and Reform, Ireland, ESM Governor
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 3 7
02 ESM activities
Processing the financial transactions of the ESM
The ESM engages in substantial financial operations daily. The Middle and Back Office division performs a vital role in validating and processing these transactions.
The Middle and Back Office supports three teams: ALM and Lending, which monitors liquidity risk and manages the outstanding loans to programme countries; Funding and Investor Relations, which raises the money to finance lending operations; and Investment and Treasury, which manages the paid-in capital of €80.5 billion, the 19
reserve fund, and the liquidity buffer. 02
The Middle Office embeds risk management and control procedures in its transaction processing. The Back Office ensures that securities and financial instruments are bought or sold for the correct amount of money, at the appropriate time, and with the right counterparty. It also transfers the money.
19 As at 31 December 2018.
3 8 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
ALM and Lending Coordination
The Middle Office helps to draft lending documents The Coordination team drives change across the ESM for disbursement, verifies the accurate recording of through project management and business analysis. loan details in the system, and provides invoices for It leads the ESM’s strategic planning and contributes all financial assistance programme countries. The to the continuous improvement of the organisational Back Office executes disbursements and subseplanning cycle. It hosts the outsourcing committee quently monitors in- and outflows to and from proand oversees the implementation and further develgramme countries. opment of the outsourcing policy.
In 2018, the Coordination team organised the tech
Funding and Investor Relations nical assistance mission to Greece and finalised the
definition of the ESM’s functional model, the first pillar Once Funding issues a security, the Middle Office valin the institution’s overall operating model. The funcidates the trade. Then the Back Office confirms that tional model influences, in particular, sourcing decithe trade details match those of the purchasing instisions, IT strategy, and human resource management. tutions. Finally, the Back Office ensures that the trade The Coordination team also led and/or contributed is correctly delivered. to a number of internal projects including the introduction
of new products, improved risk management and portfolio performance, records management, and
Investment and Treasury operational improvements.
Once Investment initiates a trade, the Middle Office
validates it, ensuring details are correctly recorded, Commercial Legal and Procurement
and investment limits are respected. The Back Office then instructs an external provider to settle the trade. The Commercial Legal and Procurement team sup The Middle and Back Office each have separate ports the fulfilment of the ESM’s operational needs in post-trading activities to make sure trades are corline with the strict standards of the ESM procurement rectly executed. policy. Created at the start of 2018 with the merger of two teams, the new unified team supported several As part of the Middle Office, the portfolio performance key procurement procedures and contracts, includteam supports Investment and Treasury, the investing for a Risk Management and Portfolio Analytics ment management committee, and other functions Software and a critical upgrade to the ESM’s SWIFT through performance measurement, appraisal, attriinfrastructure. The team also introduced a planning bution, and maintenance of benchmark portfolios. tool and an information portal, standardising and automating various internal processes. In addition, Together with Middle and Back Office, the Coordinathe team started using the Eurosystem Procurement tion team and the Commercial Legal and Procure Coordination Office (EPCO), enabling the ESM to proment team constitute the department: Middle & Back cure at better commercial terms due to economies Office and Portfolio Performance, Coordination and of scale. Commercial Legal and Procurement.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 3 9
ALM and Lending activities
ƒ The ALM team participated in the completion of tion measures did not alter interest rates charged the interest rate risk reduction programme for to other beneficiary Members. The team reinforced Greece and continued to improve the liquidity operational controls and the hedging programme is management framework. now in a maintenance phase.
ƒ The Lending team implemented the final year of Because the ESM hedges interest rate risk for Greece the three-year financial assistance programme to and made a second issuance in US dollars, the ALM Greece, which concluded in August 2018. team also further improved the ESM’s liquidity management framework. In September 2018, the liquidity
ƒ Spain made three additional voluntary early loan management framework was amended to allow the repayments in 2018. ESM to place available cash in its ECB account. The ECB charges interest on this cash and the income this generates is spread among euro area countries,
Asset and Liability Management according to the capital key.
ALM’s role is to measure, monitor, and Lending 02
manage the liquidity, currency, and
interest rate mismatches between Conclusion of the ESM Greek programme
assets and liabilities that may arise
from the execution of the ESM and As of the end of August 2018, the ESM Greek programme EFSF mandate. successfully concluded and the ESM had disbursed
€61.9 billion in financial assistance, 72% of the original €86 billion committed under the August 2015 agreement
In 2018, the ALM and Funding teams jointly comwith Greece. As a consequence of the expiration of the pleted a hedging programme under the interest rate availability period on 20 August 2018, the remaining risk reduction measures for Greece. In this process, €24.1 billion is no longer available for disbursement. the ESM took into account the last disbursements to
Greece under its financial assistance programme. For The ESM made three disbursements to Greece in 2018 more information on this topic, see ‘ Greek programme totalling €21.7 billion, all in cash. Of these, €8.8 billion was achievements ’ and the Greek country section . used for debt servicing, €1.5 billion was dedicated to net
arrears clearance, while the remaining €11.4 billion con In line with the Eurogroup’s guidance, the team also tributed to the building up of a cash buffer. The amounts adapted the ESM’s financial framework so the reducdisbursed in 2018 must be repaid from 2034 to 2060.
“To strengthen the euro we need to strengthen the eurozone. So before putting the cart before the horse, we need to proceed at a quicker pace with finishing the process of banking union, establishing a mechanism to deal with regional inequalities, and much more besides.”
EUCLID TSAKALOTOS
Minister of Finance, Greece, ESM Governor
4 0 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Table 1 ESM disbursements to Greece
Disbursement Disbursement Loan amount (in € billion) date
In kind In cash Cumulative
1st tranche, sub A, disbursement 1 20/08/2015 13 13
1st tranche, sub A, disbursement 2 24/11/2015 2 15
1st tranche, sub B, disbursement 1 01/12/2015 2.72 17.72
1st tranche, sub B, disbursement 2 08/12/2015 2.705 20.425
1st tranche, sub A, disbursement 3 23/12/2015 1 21.425
2nd tranche, disbursement 1 21/06/2016 7.5 28.925
2nd tranche, disbursement 2 26/10/2016 2.8 31.725
3rd tranche, disbursement 1 10/07/2017 7.7 39.425
3rd tranche, disbursement 2 30/10/2017 0.8 40.225
4th tranche, disbursement 1 28/03/2018 5.7 45.925
4th tranche, disbursement 2 15/06/2018 1 46.925
5th tranche 06/08/2018 15 61.925
Total 5.425 56 61.925
Source: ESM 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 4 1
The ESM, as reported in the ESM 2017 Annual Spain makes another three voluntary
Report, received an early repayment of approximately prepayments
€2 billion from Greece in February 2017, after one bank that had been recapitalised with contingent In October 2018, Spain executed the ninth voluntary convertible bonds returned those funds to Greece early repayment of loans under its bank recapitalisain December 2016. This triggered an early repaytion programme for €3 billion, following the ESM Board ment right for the ESM that it exercised in February of Directors’ approval. Earlier in the year, in February 2017, reducing the loan outstanding to €59.9 billion and May 2018, Spain carried out the seventh and from €61.9 billion. In March 2018, the ESM Board of eighth voluntary early repayments of €2 billion and Directors approved the amendment of the Financial €3 billion, respectively. At the end of 2018, the total Assistance Facility Agreement with Greece, adding outstanding amount of the ESM loan to Spain was the HCAP, a new fund established as part of the ESM €23.72 billion, out of a total €41.3 billion disbursed programme, into the lending structure. from an initial programme amount of €100 billion.
In the course of the year, the Lending team also con Spain had previously voluntarily prepaid €2 billion in tributed to finalising the design and preparing the November 2017, €1 billion in June 2017, €1 billion in implementation of the medium-term debt measures November 2016, €2.5 billion in July 2015, €1.5 billion in for Greece, which were endorsed by the Eurogroup in March 2015, and €1.3 billion in July 2014. It also made June 2018. a scheduled repayment of €0.3 billion in July 2014.
02
Table 2
Total budget savings for all programme countries
(in % of GDP)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Ireland 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2
Greece 0.0 1.6 4.1 5.0 5.2 6.2 6.6 7.0
EFSF 0.0 1.6 3.7 4.3 4.4 4.7 5.0 5.0
Deferred interest 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7
ESM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 1.1 1.3
Spain 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1
Cyprus 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.9
Portugal 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Note: The ESM estimates these savings by comparing the effective interest rate payments on ESM and EFSF loans with the interest payments these countries would have paid had they covered their financing needs in the market. First, we estimate the direct budget savings per disbursement by comparing the ESM and EFSF rate to the 10-year bond yield, used as a proxy long-term market rate. We apply a cap of 6.4% on market rates, which from experience of the crisis suggests significant market stress and imminent loss of market access. Second, we calculate the indirect benefits. For each disbursement, the ESM calculates the gains from the previous year’s reduced financing needs, making the same market rate assumptions as for direct budget savings.
Sources: ESM calculations based on ECB and Eurostat data
4 2 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Funding and Investor Relations
ƒ The ESM’s Greek programme drew to a successyears to come, continuing the diversified funding ful close in August 2018, ending all the rescue strategy, which includes:
funds’ active programmes entered into since 2012, but the EFSF and ESM will remain present in ƒ New benchmark euro bonds across the yield curve debt markets for future decades rolling over debt related to the rescue loans. ƒ Reopenings of existing bonds
ƒ The ESM issued its second dollar bond, a 2-year, ƒ Strategic presence in the dollar market building its strategic presence in the dollar market.
ƒ Regular bill programme ƒ The ESM further diversified its investor base in
2018, attracting 60 new investors to its issues. ƒ N-bond programme
The year 2018 was a milestone for the ESM with the To fulfil its mission, the ESM must always be ready to end of the programme for Greece in August. For the raise large amounts on the debt capital markets should first time in the ESM’s history, there are no new loan the necessity arise. It must therefore ensure it has a disbursements to finance. Since the programme’s significant market presence and continue its funding conclusion, investors have often asked whether the strategy, which aims to provide opportunities for a vari EFSF/ESM will continue the funding programme. ety of investors across a wide range of instruments.
The answer is, of course, ‘yes’. While the loan disbursements
have stopped, the EFSF and ESM will need to Funding programme
manage the rollover of their combined, approximately €300 billion in existing debt. The bonds issued have In December 2017, the combined funding for the ESM an average maturity of eight-to-nine years. In comand EFSF was announced to be €51 billion for 2018. parison, the outstanding average maturity of all EFSF and ESM loans combined was about 23 years at end ƒ €23 billion for the ESM 2018. Because of the mismatch between bond and loan maturities, until all the loans have been repaid, ƒ €28 billion for the EFSF the ESM and EFSF will have to roll over maturing bonds – expected to run at a pace of some €30 billion On 8 February 2018, the ESM Board of Directors a year for the coming years. The EFSF and ESM will approved an early repayment by Spain of €5 billion. therefore remain significant issuers of debt for many Of this total, €2 billion was repaid on 23 February and the remaining €3 billion in May. The ESM fund
“For more than 300 million citizens, the euro is the most tangible symbol of what we can achieve when working together. Completing the banking and capital markets unions and, in the longer term, a European safe asset, will underpin confidence in our common currency for the benefit of our citizens and global financial stability.”
NADIA CALVIÑO
Minister for Economy and Business, Spain, ESM Governor
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 4 3
ing target was consequently reduced to €18 billion On the positive side, the end of net asset purchases
from €23 billion and the combined funding target brought wider spreads for our bonds and Sovereign, to €46 billion from €51 billion. Spain made a further Supranational and Agency (SSA) bonds in general vervoluntary
repayment of €3 billion in October, which sus swaps and government bonds. From an investor
was digested by the ESM’s liquidity management point of view, this is very good news. Especially those
and did not impact the ESM funding programme. investors like bank treasuries that tend to hedge their
To finance rollover needs, the combined funding for investments with swaps, or those who are benchthe
EFSF and ESM in 2019 will be €32.5 billion. marked versus government bonds, took advantage of
the attractive levels. As a consequence of the wider ƒ €10 billion for ESM spreads versus swaps, the yields of our bonds at the
short end became less negative. This allowed the
ƒ €22.5 billion for EFSF ESM to issue a 3-year bond in October, the first bond
it has issued in this maturity for over three years.
Market environment
ESM bond issuance
The ECB announced the end of the net purchases for the asset purchase programme in December 2018,
prompting considerable discussion with investors The ESM funding team raised the planned €18 billion
about the potential consequences for the ESM. through the issuance of four new euro bonds, three
re-openings of existing euro bonds, and the launch
Quantitative easing had reassured investors that the of the ESM’s second dollar bond. Bonds were spread 02
ECB was ready to purchase bonds in the secondary across the yield curve ranging from the 3-year bond in
market. Investors such as asset managers and hedge October to the reopening in August of a 40-year bond
funds who like to regularly buy and sell bonds, had issued in 2016.
been placing large orders for ESM bonds comfortable
in the knowledge that they could easily sell them on As part of the strategy to widen its investor base, the
the secondary market to the ECB. Yet, while the net ESM issued its first dollar bond in October 2017. The
purchases of the PSPP may have drawn to a close,
the principal reinvestment needs are relatively high, following October, it launched a second dollar bond, a
and the ECB will still be present as a buyer on the 2-year. Central banks purchased an exceptionally high
secondary market. While the large ECB buy orders 73% (Figure 24). The ESM successfully diversified its
seen during the active PSPP period may decrease, the investor base (Figure 25), attracting the participation
PSPP will, therefore, still continue to support the marof seven new investors and 10 new subsidiaries of
ket in 2019, albeit to a lesser degree. existing investors.
Figure 24 Figure 25
ESM 2-year dollar bond issue breakdown, ESM 2-year dollar bond issue breakdown, by investor type by geography
1%
21% 27% 26%
5%
10%
73% 16%
21%
Central banks/ Fund managers Asia Euro area Govt/SWFs Pensions funds/ UK & Switzerland Middle East Banks insurance Americas
Source: ESM Source: ESM
4 4 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
ESM bill issuance Best supranational euro deal of the year
The ESM held regular 3- and 6-month bill auctions In December 2018, the capital markets publication in 2018, continuing the bill programme launched in Global Capital awarded the ESM with ‘Best Supra January 2013. The bill market is an important tool to national Euro Deal of the Year’, recognising the diversify the funding source and investor base. The €4 billion 5-year bond issued in July. It addressed ESM therefore keeps a minimum presence to ensure investor demand at the shorter end of the yield permanent access to this investor base. If liquidity curve attracting over €9 billion in orders. needs were to rise, the ESM could increase the bill volume to limit oversupply on the bond curve. At the Global Capital Bond Awards in May 2018, Siegfried Ruhl, the head of ESM Funding and Inves Since inception, the ESM has conducted 138 3- and tor Relations, won two awards: Overall Most Impres 6-month bill auctions, raising more than €245 billion. sive SSA Funding Official and Most Impressive Supranational Funding Official.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 4 5
Investor relations
The investor relations team visited the rescue funds’ most important investors in 35 countries and 47 cities.
02
Source: ESM
In 2018, the investor relations team went on 18 roadshows, and conducted 133 investor meet
13% ings, updating the rescue fund’s most important investors in 35 countries and 47 cities on
13% ESM activities and the funding programme. The ESM also organised four investor forums. The
53% Chairperson of the ESM Board of Governors attended two of these events, showing his strong
21% support for ESM marketing activities. During the year, 60 investors bought ESM or EFSF bonds
in the primary market for the first time.
North America Europe Africa Asia
Canada Austria Hungary Algeria China, People’s Montreal Vienna Budapest Algiers Republic of
Ottawa Azerbaijan Italy Botswana Beijing Toronto Baku Milan Gaborone India
Mexico Bulgaria Luxembourg Morocco Mumbai Mexico City Sofia Luxembourg Rabat Indonesia
United States Croatia Norway Namibia Bali of America Zagreb Oslo Windhoek Jakarta
New York Czech Republic Spain South Africa Japan Washington DC Prague Madrid Pretoria Tokyo
Denmark Sweden Tunisia Kazakhstan Copenhagen Stockholm Tunis Almaty Finland Switzerland Korea, Helsinki Basel Republic of France Geneva Seoul Lyon Zurich Singapore Paris United Kingdom Singapore Germany London Sri Lanka Cologne Colombo Düsseldorf Taiwan, Hamburg Province of China Hannover Taipei Mainz Munich
4 6 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Major rating agencies affirm ESM’s high rating position
Table 3 ESM ratings
Fitch Moody’s DBRS
Long-term Short Rating Long-term Short Rating Long-term Short Rating
rating term rating outlook rating term rating outlook rating term rating trend
AAA F1+ Stable Aa1 P-1 Positive AAA R-1 (high) Stable
Note: DBRS ratings are unsolicited. DBRS has rated the ESM at AAA since it initiated the rating in April 2014. Fitch has rated the ESM at AAA since inception in October 2012, and Moody’s at Aa1 since November 2012. In May 2018, Moody’s changed the ESM rating outlook to positive from stable.
Sources: The rating agencies named, compiled by the ESM
“Increasing the international role of the euro is a matter of sovereignty and a decisive step for better protecting European citizens and businesses. This is why we need to strengthen our common currency by completing the architecture of Economic and Monetary Union and creating a eurozone budget.”
BRUNO LE MAIRE
Minister for the Economy and Finance, France, ESM Governor
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 4 7
Investment and Treasury
ƒ ESM investment outperforms its long-term bench The credit quality of the paid-in capital investments marks since inception remains at a very high level, in line with the ESM’s investment guidelines, which are designed to prioriƒ
ESM is reimbursed for negative interest costs on tise capital preservation. The percentage of capital cash held in cash at Eurosystem central banks or invested in assets rated AA- or higher stood at 95%, almost
ƒ ESM enters into securities lending transactions unchanged from 2017 (Figure 27). The universe of eligible issuers remained broadly stable, adding a small
ƒ ESM further integrates principles for socially number of covered bond issuers. responsible investing
The negative performance of the investment portfo The Investment and Treasury team is entrusted with lios led the ESM to record a negative realised return of investing the ESM’s paid-in capital, which stood at €145 million for the year. However, this loss was more €80.5 billion at the end of 2018. The paid-in capital will than offset by the reimbursement of €216 million of total €80.8 billion in 2027, when the last instalments negative interest paid by the ESM on its cash deposits from all ESM Members are received unless new memat Eurosystem central banks in 2017. To ensure that
bers join the euro area. the negative interest environment would not erode 02
ESM’s long-term creditworthiness, which relies on its In 2018, the ESM’s paid-in capital recorded a return of paid-in and callable capital, France and Germany had -0.18%. The negative performance is primarily attribagreed, as a temporary solution, to return the negautable to the negative yield on the assets in which the tive interest paid by the ESM on its capital deposited ESM invests, in particular the negative remuneration at their respective national central banks. As a result, on cash balances left with Eurosystem central banks. the accumulated return of the ESM’s capital, since However, the fall in German government bond yields, 2012, is €1.074 billion, without taking into account the by 11-to-18 basis points in the 5- to 10-year sector, interest reimbursement. The ESM is currently reviewcontributed to increase returns, as this pushed the ing its investment guidelines to increase the ability to price of fixed-income assets higher. invest over a longer horizon, which should, over time,
increase returns while maintaining the ESM’s highest To reduce the impact of negative yields on its investcreditworthiness. ments, the ESM adjusts the structure of its portfolios to optimise its return within the ESM’s risk framework. Since 2012 the ESM has outperformed its benchmarks The ESM kept its cash allocation around an average by 0.15% per year — without taking into account the balance of €58 billion throughout the year. By keeprepayment of the negative interest rate charges. The ing part of the capital in cash, instead of investing it benchmarks consist of indices of AAA/AA rated euro in short maturity securities, the ESM can reduce the area government and supranational bonds, reflecting negative yield contribution. German 2-year bonds, for the eligible asset classes of the ESM’s investment example, were trading between -0.50% and -0.65% guidelines. The duration of the benchmark is closely in 2018, below the Eurosystem deposit facility rate aligned with the 0- to 1-year maturity bond index for (-0.40%). the short-term tranche, and the 1- to 3-year maturity
bond index for the medium/long-term tranche, in The ESM did not significantly modify its interest rate line with the ESM’s risk appetite. In 2018, the annual exposure over the year, to limit the risk of asset depreperformance of the paid-in capital was in line with ciation, in anticipation of a potential normalisation of the benchmark. monetary policy. The ESM also continued to increase its investments in covered bonds and in non-euro denominated assets, hedged into euros, which both offer higher returns than highly rated government bonds (Figure 26).
4 8 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Figure 26 Figure 27 Asset class distribution of investments Ratings distribution of investments
8.5% 3.4% 0.3%
0.0% 6.1%
2.3%
8.4% 3.2% 1.9%
10.7% 17.2%
69%
69%
Sovereign Eurosystem
Sub-sovereign - Supranational NCBs & BIS AAA AA+ AA
Governmentrelated
agency Covered bonds A AA- A+ A-
Source: ESM Source: ESM
an additional 50-to-60 basis point spread over the
ESM progressively increases its use of German yield curve. derivative instruments
As interest rates fell, the ESM also increased the The ESM, which deploys derivatives to manage or use of swaps to manage the interest rate risk of the hedge risks, has expanded its use of these instrupaid-in capital in a cost efficient manner. By the end of ments and increased the range of counterparties with 2018, the total notional amount of interest rate swaps whom it can enter into derivatives contracts. This outstanding in connection with the investment of the provided the ESM with broader access to the marpaid-in capital stood at €2.1 billion. ket, which is critical to ensure that the ESM benefits from competitive pricing. The ESM can now enter into
derivatives transactions with a dozen commercial The ESM launches securities lending using banks, with the credit exposure that may arise from repo and reverse repo operations
these operations fully collateralised. The ESM aims to expand the group of counterparties with additional In 2018, the ESM initiated its first repo and reverse institutions that meet the eligibility requirements, to repo transactions, to benefit from the yield differential ensure best execution and increase diversification of between securities that are highly sought after, and credit exposure. those that are not. These transactions involve lending out securities in the portfolio for a short period This expanded capacity was mainly used to increase of time against another, less-scarce security with the ESM’s investments in non-euro denominated similar credit quality as collateral. The operations are securities, which reached a €7.2 billion equivalent matched in amount and in maturity, and executed at the end of 2018 from €5.3 billion a year earlier. with Eurex as a central clearing counterparty, to Cross-currency swaps enable the ESM to invest in ensure a high level of security. While the return varies longer-dated non-euro denominated assets withaccording to market conditions, in 2018 this activity out the associated currency risk, thus improving the earned the ESM an additional 10 to 50 basis points ESM’s ability to diversify its exposure to a broad range on securities lent out for periods between one and of high-quality issuers across geographic regions. As four weeks. The volume of repo activity remains limof the end of 2018, the ESM holds assets denomiited at this stage, as the stock of securities the ESM nated in six currencies (US dollar, British pound, Japowns with significantly higher value in the repo maranese yen, Swiss franc, Canadian dollar, and Swedish ket is currently relatively low. As a secondary benefit, krona) out of a total of nine that are eligible. The ESM repo transactions also help the ESM to raise liquidalso increased the average maturity of its non-euro ity quickly and in a cost-effective manner, should the investments to 3.9 years from 3.3 years at the end of need arise in periods of market stress. 2017, benefiting from the higher yield differentials in longer maturities. A large share of the investments, €4.9 billion, is denominated in Japanese yen, offering
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 4 9
ESM as a sustainable and responsible investor Out of these investments, €475 million have a targeted
purpose such as the financing of social housing The ESM invests in securities and issuers that are or environmental projects. The ESM aims to further aligned with Environmental, Social, and Governance integrate responsible investment principles into the principles. Entities, such as governments, public management of its assets in the future, while ensuragencies, and supranationals with a significant ing that these investments remain in line with the social and environmental contribution accounted for ESM’s objective to guarantee the ESM’s creditworthi 69% of ESM invested capital, as of the end of 2018. ness and liquidity.
For more on this topic, see ‘ ESM: committed to public service, transparency, and accountability ’.
INVESTMENT STRATEGY PROCESS
INVESTMENT STRATEGY
-
+> ESM regularly reviews its long-term strategy to ensure smooth adjustment over time
Preserves Regularly adjusts 02
capital portfolio structure
ASSET ALLOCATION
-
+> ESM diversifies its investments to ensure only modest impact on any single issuer or security
Diversifies Focuses on assets assets with ample liquidity
MARKET IMPLEMENTATION
-
+> ESM adjusts transaction size and trades with a diversified group of eligible international counterparties
Calibrates Conducts transactions transactions across to reflect various channels market depth
5 0 | 5 0 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Risk and Compliance
ƒ Risk and Compliance maintained effective control The Risk and Compliance team updated the ESM’s of market, credit, liquidity (for both market and risk policies in response to recent initiatives and the funding), operational, reputational, and legal risk. introduction of new tools. It established a new policy for financial model validation and model risk manageƒ
Risk and Compliance dynamically adapted the ment and updated the ESM’s funding liquidity risk polrisk and compliance framework to developing icy and credit risk policy. It also finalised the annual business needs within the accepted level of risk review of the ESM’s High Level Principles for Risk appetite. Management and ESM Risk Policy.
ƒ Risk and Compliance in 2018 assessed interest In line with previous recommendations from the Basel rate and foreign currency risks arising from foreign Committee on Banking Supervision, Risk and Complicurrency investments and US dollar issuances, ance uses in-house models to monitor both credit risk completed the short-term debt relief measures exposure from its investment activities and counterfor Greece, and reinforced the ESM information party risk from its derivative and collateral managesecurity framework. ment operations. In addition, Risk and Compliance conducts an annual review and regular reporting to
ƒ Risk and Compliance participated in relevant the Internal Risk Committee and the Board Risk Comforums to share knowledge and best practice, mittee.
and also organised and hosted the 12 th annual EU Operational Risk Management Forum. The ESM Risk function expanded its monitoring capacity of emerging risks arising from financial mar
During the year, Risk and Compliance enhanced its ket trends and emerging geopolitical risks to assess methodologies to monitor and manage the risks both their potential impact on the ESM and if ESM of debt instruments, capital investments, and their risk appetite requires refining. The analysis looks at related derivative transactions. Its activity focused on how discrete risks (credit, liquidity, market, and operinterest rate and foreign exchange risk from investational) should be managed to ensure the ESM’s prements in foreign currencies and USD issuances. It paredness. also worked on reducing the interest rate risk on the Greek loans, fulfilling one of the objectives of the Integrity, confidentiality, and accessibility of informashort-term debt measures for Greece. For more infortion are critical for the ESM. Risk, together with the mation on these and related measures, see ‘Greek information technology (IT) team, use best practices programme achievements’. in independent risk assessments and evaluations of controls to ensure the appropriate mitigation of cybersecurity risks.
“Twenty years from its inception, the euro has established itself as the most important international currency next to the dollar. Progress towards the completion of monetary union together with coordinated action by the euro area members is necessary to further strengthen the international role of the euro.”
GIOVANNI TRIA
Minister of Economy and Finance, Italy, ESM Governor
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 5 1
“Undoubtedly, the euro has become a symbol of Europe in the world, in its 20 years of existence. It is my firm belief that its international role could and should be further strengthened as a safe and reliable currency. This will also enhance the euro area’s political, economic, and financial weight.”
HARRIS GEORGIADES
Minister of Finance, Cyprus, ESM Governor
02
The ESM must be vigilant in protecting its critical Monitoring is a core objective of the Risk and Comassets against inevitable cyber security risks. To safepliance function and each activity is assessed in relaguard the ESM, various methods, including multiple tion to potential financial and non-financial risks, with layers of defence as well as detective and protective the use of key risk indicators and regular reporting to controls, are applied. The ESM continuously trains both the Internal Risk Committee and the Board Risk staff on information security and cyber risks associ Committee. ated with new technologies. The ESM tries to identify all possible cyber risks to, and potential impacts on, Risk and Compliance at the ESM is built on a best its most critical assets, deciding on the best approach practice framework, consistent with the ESM Treaty for each case. and the High Level Principles for Risk Management.
For detailed information, see our website .
5 2 | 5 2 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
THE THREE LINES OF DEFENCE MODEL
1 ST LINE OF DEFENCE
Operational management
amework
ol fr Board of Directors/ 2
ND LINE OF DEFENCE Managing Director
Board Risk Committee Risk Management and
Compliance and Management Board
Internal contr Board of Auditors 3 RD LINE OF DEFENCE
Internal audit
The ESM follows the ‘three lines of defence’ governmanaged and monitored. The third line of defence ance model, which sets out clearly drawn lines of consists of an independent internal audit function,
authority and appropriate segregation of powers and led by the Head of Internal Audit, responsible for produties for risk management. viding the Board of Directors with assurance that risk management controls are operating properly and effi The first line of defence consists of business funcciently. Both the Chief Risk Officer and Internal Auditor tions and departments with direct responsibility for report directly to the Managing Director, as well as to, the day-to-day management of risk. The second respectively, the Board Risk Committee and the Board line of defence is performed by an independent risk of Auditors, to ensure their independence. management and compliance function, led by the Chief Risk Officer, which oversees the risks assumed by the business and ensures they are appropriately
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 5 3
Compliance – part of the second line of provide for more detailed rules on ESM personal data defence processing and privacy. Staff training sessions will
follow the approval of the updated policy. The Compliance function supports the business, in line with the ESM Compliance Charter, by addressing
risks in connection with personal ethical conduct, Risk awareness and networking
such as potential conflicts of interest over private investments, anti-money laundering, corruption pre The ESM holds regular workshops and seminars on vention, privacy requirements and the ESM’s market specialised risk topics to improve performance and conduct, including the maintenance of information keep staff abreast of developments and best pracbarriers. tices. In 2018, Risk and Compliance focused on training
staff on operational risk management, fraud pre The ESM regularly reviews and amends the comvention, and compliance matters. pliance policies to reflect changes in business processes, external requirements, industry best practice, As part of the ESM’s continued participation in a netor regulatory guidance where applicable. work of international financial institutions (IFIs), the
Risk and Compliance team hosted the 12th annual The compliance officer monitors activity and adher EU Operational Risk Management Forum, bringing ence to the Code of Conduct and other policies such together over 10 different IFIs in November 2018. as those on information barriers and data protection, Institutions exchanged views and best practices on sending reviews on a quarterly basis to the Internal model validation, cyber security risks, and change Risk Committee and the Board Risk Committee for management. In April, the team participated in the
discussion and follow-up action. Annual Central Bank Forum of risk managers in 02
Mexico, during which it presented the ESM’s opera From 25 May 2018, the General Data Protection Regtional risk framework to participating central banks ulation (GDPR) replaced the EU Directive 95/46/EC and IFIs. on data protection. Although the ESM is not directly subject to the GDPR, it is in the process of updating its personal data protection policy and is cooperating with other international organisations to share experiences and best practices. The amended policy will
ESM RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES
Use lending capacity efficiently
01
Ensure minimum Provide sufficient liquidity
borrowing costs 02 for needs
06
OBJECTIVES
03
05
Achieve performance goals Avoid capital calls
04
Be prepared for the unexpected
5 4 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
FOUR-STEP MANAGEMENT PROCESS
01 RISK IDENTIFICATION
Identification of all material risk exposures, both financial (credit, market, and liquidity risk) and non-financial (operational, reputational, legal, compliance, and political).
02 RISK ASSESSMENT AND MEASUREMENT
Assessment of identified risk exposures to determine their materiality, based on a combination of quantitative tools and expert judgement.
03 RISK MONITORING AND CONTROL
On-going monitoring and control of material risk exposures, including limit frameworks, key risk indicators, reporting, and escalation.
04 RISK MANAGEMENT
Process of determining and executing appropriate actions to actively manage risk exposures, such as
mitigation, transfer, reduction, or acceptance of the risk.
“The international role of the euro is primarily based on market-driven factors and reflects the credibility of the euro area. It is in our interest to strengthen the economic resilience of Economic and Monetary Union against economic shocks, to develop capital markets, and to reduce vulnerability to external factors.”
JĀNIS REIRS
Minister of Finance, Latvia, ESM Governor
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 7 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 5 5 | 5 5
Focus on the Risk and Control Self-Assessment (RCSA) process
The Risk and Control Self-Assessment (RCSA) is designed to identify and evaluate risks and associated controls. Its regular practice aids in integrating risk management practices and culture into staff’s daily activities. The RCSA, introduced in 2015,
Analyse internal
controls is therefore an integral part of the overall operational risk framework at the ESM.
In 2018, the ESM reinforced its RCSA practice by reviewing the link between its Operational Risk framework and international standards set by the Basel committee. As
Consolidate RCSA +
internal controls a result, the ESM now incorporates the second level of Basel operational risk cat risk analysis egories, which has improved the ESM’s ability to monitor, control, and assess the risk of pricing errors, settlement failures, or unauthorised access to systems. This work forms the basis for an enterprise-level assessment of the ESM’s risk exposure.
Operational risk Risk also mapped the library of ESM controls – the Internal Control Framework and
conducts
internal review related process flows – to the RCSA providing a more granular view of the potential risks for each division. The outcome of each division’s RCSA is the basis for the Top Risk Self-Assessment (TRSA) report, in which the Risk team provides the Manage
Share RCSA ment Board and the Board Risk Committee an enterprise view of major risks (e.g.
with divisons, cybersecurity, capital preservation).
for review, approval
The RCSA includes post-action mitigation plans, providing a forecast of the expo 02 02
sure and a base of comparison for follow-up and monitoring. This activity enabled Prepare the creation of a risk library that standardises the management of operational risk
TRSA report
elements, such as RCSA risks, controls, key risk indicators, incidents as well as action plans.
Share draft TRSA with management
Internal Risk Committee approves TRSA 5 6 | 5 6 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
ESM: committed to public service, transparency, and accountability
As an intergovernmental institution with a public man Social: With its internal policies and procedures, the date, the ESM is committed to the highest standards ESM endeavours to ensure that its activities are conof public service. ESM staff are dedicated to fulfillducted in line with the highest standards of integrity. ing their work in this spirit. This translates into inter The ESM considers its members of staff to be its most nal practices, policies, and values in use when ESM valuable asset and actively supports their wellbeing staff carry out the institution’s mission. This is also by promoting a healthy work-life balance through flexreflected in the ESM’s commitment to Environmental, ible working arrangements. The ESM fosters diverse Social, and Governance practices, as well as ongoing ideas and a diverse working environment by providing efforts to enhance the institution’s accountability and equal opportunity to all its staff. transparency. The ESM also adheres to environmental and social principles when investing its €80.5 billion in paid-in
Environment, social, governance practices capital. For more information on the ESM as a sustainable
and responsible, see the Investment and Environment: The ESM is committed to protect Treasury section. ing the environment and thus follows a prudent approach to environmental matters. The ESM Code Governance: The ESM has a robust governance of Conduct calls for ESM staff to operate in a way framework in place, which ensures strong accountathat limits the carbon footprint and maximises the bility and transparency vis-à-vis both the ESM sharere-use of material. holders and other stakeholders.
As such, the ESM continuously implements measures
to improve its internal environmental impact and Transparency and accountability
reduce the use of natural resources and energy as well as the generation of emissions and waste. Once Accountability and transparency are embedded in again in 2018, the ESM obtained a certificate from the the ESM’s governance as its Board of Governors Luxembourg government on the sound treatment of comprises finance ministers representing the demenergy sources and the recycling of waste. The ESM ocratically elected governments of the ESM Memalso encourages its staff to use public transport or bers. National parliamentary procedures, sometimes other energy efficient modes of transport and be envirequired by ESM Members before approving ESM ronmentally conscious. decisions, make the ESM also indirectly accountable to parliaments.
“The euro is a relatively young currency; nevertheless it is the second most important currency in the world. This shows its potential. More confidence in the euro area economy would lead to a stronger international role of the euro. The Economic and Monetary Union deepening initiatives, especially the completion of the banking union and capital markets union as well as strengthening the role of the ESM in the Economic and Monetary Union architecture, which, we are intensively working on, would also contribute to this objective.”
VILIUS ŠAPOKA
Minister of Finance, Lithuania, ESM Governor
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 5 7
02
The independent Board of Auditors has a full public working papers, and discussion papers. The ESM welaudit mandate and provides extensive audit oversight. comed 15 international visitor and student groups and The Board of Auditors’ annual report to the Board of continued its ongoing dialogue with the media.
Governors, together with the ESM management comments in response to the report, are made available to The ESM Managing Director also regularly attended the national parliaments and supreme audit institutions the European Parliament’s Economic and Monetary of the ESM Members, the European Parliament, and Affairs Committee and made appearances at national the European Court of Auditors. The report, together parliaments. with ESM management comments, is available to the public on the ESM website .
Evaluation of financial To enhance the transparency and evaluability of its assistance programmes
financial assistance programmes, in 2018 the ESM set up a programme database, which provides data on In the second half of 2018, the ESM started preparaprogramme disbursements, lending, conditionality, and tory work for a second evaluation in response to the forecasting. The new database, which will go live to the June 2017 Board of Governors’ commitment to “an public in 2019, is in response to the June 2017 Board evaluation of the Greek programmes after completion” of Governors mandate to address some of the recomand the end of the ESM programme for Greece on 20 mendations from the first evaluation of EFSF and ESM August 2018. On 18 February 2019, the Chairperson of financial assistance, which was led by the High-Level the Board of Governors appointed Joaquín Almunia, Independent Evaluator Gertrude Tumpel-Gugerell. former European Commission Vice-President, as the
High-Level Independent Evaluator. The evaluation’s To enhance familiarity with the ESM’s work across the objective will be to enhance the relevance and effec EU and elsewhere in the world, the ESM’s Managing tiveness of ESM’s programme-related activities, and Director, and other management board and staff memsupport informed future policy decision-making. The bers spoke at various conferences, seminars, and acaconclusions and recommendations of this second demic gatherings in 2018. ESM researchers explore evaluation will be presented to the ESM Board of Govmandate-related topics in publically available series, ernors at its Annual Meeting in June 2020.
5 8 | 5 8 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
“Thanks to the unprecedented reform efforts we have collectively embarked upon following the crisis, the euro is today firmly set on a solid footing. Its role on the international stage will unquestionably strengthen from here on, as confidence in our common currency further gains ground.”
PIERRE GRAMEGNA
Minister of Finance, Luxembourg, ESM Governor
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 5 9
03 Institutional framework and organisation
The ESM financial assistance toolkit
The ESM has a number of financial assistance instruments at its disposal to fulfil its mission, though it has used only two to-date. The ESM deploys these funds in exchange for reforms to address the causes that led to requests for ESM financial stability support.
ESM loans Loans for indirect bank recapitalisation
Goal: to assist ESM Members in significant need of Goal: to assist an ESM Member by addressing those
financing, and which have lost access to capital marcases where the financial sector is primarily at the 03
kets, either because they cannot find lenders or beroot of a crisis. cause the financing costs are so high it would undermine
the sustainability of public finances. Conditional upon: reforms to financial supervision, corporate governance of banks, and applicable
Conditional upon: the implementation of macroecolaw and regulations on bank recapitalisation, nomic reform programmes, negotiated by the Eurorestructuring, and resolution.
pean Commission in liaison with the ECB and, where Used: in Spain (ESM). possible, the IMF.
Used: in Ireland and Portugal (EFSF), in Greece (EFSF and ESM), and in Cyprus (ESM).
6 0 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Precautionary Primary credit line market purchases
Goal: to prevent crises from emerging or developing, Goal: to support an ESM Member’s bond auction, the by helping countries whose economic conditions are ESM may buy debt securities at market prices in the still sound to maintain market access by strengthprimary market, in other words directly from the issuening the credibility of their macroeconomic perforing ESM Members.
mance. Conditional upon: no conditionality beyond the under
The December 2018 Euro Summit decided to enhance lying programme, as this tool complements a regular the effectiveness of precautionary instruments. For loan instrument or a precautionary programme. more information on the summit decisions, see
‘ December 2018 Euro Summit marks new chapter for Used: no.
the ESM ’.
There are two types of credit lines:
A precautionary conditioned credit line is available to an ESM Member whose economic and financial situation is fundamentally sound and meets the eligibility criteria.
An enhanced conditions credit line is available to an ESM Member that does not comply with some of the eligibility criteria required for accessing a precautionary conditioned credit line but whose economic and financial situation remains sound.
Used: no.
Secondary Direct Recapitalisation market purchases Instrument (DRI)
Goal: to support the sound functioning of the gov Goal: to help remove a serious risk of contagion
ernment debt market when a lack of liquidity threatfrom the financial sector to the sovereign. The total
ens the financial stability of an ESM Member whose amount available for this instrument is limited to
economic and financial situation is otherwise funda€60 billion and can only be used for systemically
mentally sound. This instrument can be used within important financial institutions, as defined in the
or outside a macroeconomic adjustment programme. relevant EU legislation.
Conditional upon: specific policy conditions apply for Conditional upon: measures to address the sources countries not under a programme. of difficulties in the financial sector and the general economic situation of the country. Eligible financial Used: no. institutions are those that, for example, are unable to attract sufficient capital from the private sector and for which existing burden-sharing arrangements on bank recapitalisation, restructuring, and resolution, in particular the bail-in requirements according to Article 27 of the Single Resolution Mechanism regulation, are insufficient.
Used: no.
At the December 2018 Euro Summit, leaders also decided that the ESM will provide a credit line to be drawn upon if needed by the SRF, a tool which will become a new instrument in the ESM’s toolkit. When the ESM assumes the common backstop provider role, the DRI will be cancelled. For more information on this new mandate, see ‘ December 2018 Euro Summit marks new chapter for the ESM ’.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 6 1
Governance
ESM shareholders ised capital based on the ESM Members’ respective
shares of the EU’s total population and GDP. The The ESM shareholders are the 19 euro area member authorised capital amounts to €704.8 billion and is states that are also referred to as ESM Members. divided into paid-in and callable capital. The paid-in Each Member has contributed to the ESM’s authorcapital currently stands at €80.55 billion. 20
ESM contribution key (in %)
Germany 26.9496
France 20.2381
Italy 17.7839
Spain 11.8174
Netherlands 5.6756
Belgium 3.4519
Greece 2.7962
Austria 2.7632
Portugal 2.4910 03
Finland 1.7844
Ireland 1.5806
Slovakia 0.8184
Slovenia 0.4679
Lithuania 0.4063
Latvia 0.2746
Luxembourg 0.2486
Cyprus 0.1948 (in €'000) Subscribed capital — Total 704,798,700
Estonia 0.1847 Paid-in capital — Total 80,548,400 Euro area member states
Other EU Member States
Malta 0.0726
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Note: As of 30 April 2019. Source: ESM
*The accession of new ESM Members is factored into the capital key, reducing the existing ESM Members’ contribution keys. Individual nominal capital subscriptions and paid-in capital amounts remain unchanged for the existing ESM Members. In line with Article 42 of the ESM Treaty, ESM Members with
GDP per capita of less than 75% of the EU average in the year immediately preceding their ESM accession benefit from a temporary correction mechanism. During this period, the initial capital subscription of the ESM Member benefiting from the correction is lower, thus leading temporarily to a lower paid-in capital contribution. Once this period ends, the ESM Member must deposit the remaining amount. Most recently, Slovenia’s temporary correction period expired on 1 January 2019, and Slovenia deposited the remaining paid-in capital contribution. Malta, Slovakia, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are currently benefiting from temporary corrections, the last of which terminates at the end of 2026.
20 As at 30 April 2019.
6 2 | 6 2 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Governance structure
BOARD OF GOVERNORS
BOARD OF AUDITORS
MANAGING DIRECTOR BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
BOARD RISK COMMITTEE
BUDGET REVIEW AND
MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION
BOARD COMMITTEE
FINANCE INTERNAL RISK COMMITTEE COMMITTEE
INCIDENT BANKING INTERNAL
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEES
TEAM COMMITTEE
INVESTMENT CORPORATE PROJECTS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
TEAM
The Board of Governors meets at least once a year and whenever the affairs of the ESM so require. The Board of Directors also meets whenever the affairs
of the ESM so require (nine times in 2018), while the Board Risk Committee and the Budget Review and Compensation Committee meet regularly each
quarter and additionally when required.
For more information on our governance structure, visit our website .
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 6 3
Board of Governors
Annual Meeting of the Board of Governors
~
On 21 June 2018, the Board of Governors held its sixth annual meeting at the ESM premises in Luxembourg.
In his presentation to the Board of Governors, the Manas the Board of Auditors’ report in respect of the ESM aging Director highlighted the key achievements of the 2017 financial statements. Furthermore, the external
ESM during the past year, including its funding operaauditor presented its report in respect of the audit of the 03
tions, investment and lending activities, and institutional ESM 2017 financial statements. developments.
On the occasion, the Board of Governors also approved In addition, the Chairperson of the Board of Auditors the ESM 2017 Annual Report as drawn up by the ESM addressed the Governors with regard to the Board of Managing Director.
Auditors’ annual report to the Board of Governors as well
“The strengthening of the international role of the euro brings benefits for citizens and businesses alike, whilst contributing to the resilience of the international financial system especially against exchange rate shocks.”
EDWARD SCICLUNA
Minister of Finance, Malta, ESM Governor
6 4 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Members of the Board of Governors
Mário Centeno Euclid Tsakalotos
Chairperson of the Board of Governors since Minister of Finance, 13 January 2018, Governor since 6 July 2015
Portugal Minister of Finance, Greece
Governor since 26 November 2015
Alexander De Croo Nadia Calviño
Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Finance Minister for Economy and Business,
and Development Cooperation, Governor since 7 June 2018
Belgium Governor since 11 December 2018 Spain replacing Román Escolano,
replacing Johan Van Overtveldt, Governor since 7 March 2018 Governor since 15 December 2014 replacing Luis de Guindos, Governor since 27 September 2012
Olaf Scholz Bruno Le Maire
Federal Minister of Finance, Minister of Economy and Finance, Governor since 14 March 2018 Governor since 25 May 2017
Germany replacing Peter Altmaier, France
Governor since 24 October 2017
Martin Helme Giovanni Tria
Minister of Finance, Minister of Economy and Finance, Governor since 29 April 2019 Governor since 1 June 2018
Estonia replacing Toomas Tõniste, Italy replacing Pier Carlo Padoan,
Governor since 12 June 2017 Governor since 24 February 2014
Paschal Donohoe Harris Georgiades
Minister of Finance and Public Expenditure Minister of Finance, and Reform, Governor since 3 April 2013
Ireland Governor since 15 June 2017 Cyprus
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 6 5
Jānis Reirs Hartwig Löger
Minister of Finance, Federal Minister of Finance, Governor since 19 February 2019 Governor since 26 January 2018
Latvia replacing Dana Reizniece-Ozola, Austria replacing Hans-Jörg Schelling, Governor
Governor since 22 March 2016 since 1 September 2014
Vilius Šapoka Andrej Bertoncelj
Minister of Finance, Minister of Finance, Governor since 13 December 2016 Governor since 13 September 2018
Lithuania Slovenia replacing Mateja Vraničar Erman,
Governor since 21 September 2016
Pierre Gramegna Ladislav Kamenický
Minister of Finance, Minister of Finance, Governor since
Governor since 4 December 2013 7 May 2019 03
Luxembourg Slovakia replacing Peter Kažimír, Governor since
27 September 2012
Edward Scicluna Petteri Orpo
Minister of Finance, Minister of Finance, Governor since 13 March 2013 Governor since 29 June 2016
Malta Finland
Wopke Hoekstra
Minister of Finance, Governor since 26 October 2017
Netherlands
6 6 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Shareholder engagement Secretariat. The majority of participants came to the
ESM for the first time and the event provided them The ESM strives to maintain strong and effective an opportunity to gain insight into a wide range of shareholder relations. Effective shareholder engage ESM activities, from internal corporate operations to ment is key to the ESM fulfilling its mandate while responding to market challenges and the setting of remaining fully accountable to its Members. priorities.
In 2018, the ESM organised its fifth annual share To discuss relevant matters, the ESM also particiholders day, which once again brought together reppated in various forums where its shareholders are resentatives from all 19 ESM Members, who work in represented, such as the Eurogroup, the Eurogroup their respective ministries of finance on ESM-related Working Group, the Task Force on Coordinated Action, matters, as well as representatives from the Euroand other relevant technical working groups. pean Commission and the Eurogroup Working Group
“A stronger international role for the euro will underpin Europe’s commitment to an open, multilateral, and rules-based global economy. Increased use of the euro across the globe will enable European citizens and businesses to benefit from free and smooth trade and cheap and reliable access to finance.”
WOPKE HOEKSTRA
Minister of Finance, The Netherlands, ESM Governor
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 6 7
Board of Directors
Members of the Board of Directors
CHAIR OF THE MEETINGS Nicholas O’Brien
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Assistant Secretary General,
Department of Finance,
Klaus Regling appointed on 3 July 2014 Member of the Budget Review and
ESM Managing Director Compensation Committee since
Ireland 30 September 2014, reappointed until 8 October 2019
Steven Costers George Chouliarakis
Counselor General, Ministry of Finance, Alternate Minister of Finance, appointed on 1 May 2015 Ministry of Finance, appointed on 4 February 2015
03
Belgium Greece
Jörg Kukies Carlos San Basilio
State Secretary, Federal Ministry of Finance, Secretary General for Treasury and appointed on 9 April 2018 International Financing, replacing Thomas Steffen, Ministry of Economy and Business, originally appointed on 24 September 2012 appointed on 19 June 2018 Member of the Budget Review and replacing Fernando Navarrete,
Germany Compensation Committee since 14 May 2018, appointed until 8 October 2020 Spain appointed on 11 April 2018 Member of the Budget Review and
Compensation Committee since 13 July 2018, appointed until 8 October 2020
Märten Ross Odile Renaud Basso
Deputy Secretary General for Financial Policy Director General of the Treasury, and External Relations, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Finance and Public Accounts, appointed on 21 October 2013 appointed on 30 June 2016 Member of the Board Risk Committee since 10 February 2017,
Estonia France reappointed until 8 October 2020
6 8 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Alessandro Rivera Alfred Camilleri
Director General of the Treasury, Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Economy and Finance, appointed on 8 October 2012 appointed on 27 July 2018 Member of the Budget Review and replacing Gelsomina Vigliotti, appointed on Compensation Committee since 9 October 2012, 15 May 2018, reappointed until 8 October 2019
Italy replacing Vincenzo La Via, originally appoint Chairperson of the Budget Review and ed on 8 October 2012 Malta Compensation Committee since 24 April 2014,
Member of the Board Risk Committee since reappointed until 8 October 2019 20 September 2018, appointed until 8 October 2021
George Panteli Christiaan Rebergen
Director of the Economic Research and Treasurer-General, Ministry of Finance, European Union Affairs Directorate, appointed on 6 June 2018 Ministry of Finance, replacing Michel Heijdra, appointed on 29 April 2013 appointed on 1 February 2018 replacing Hans Vijlbrief, originally appointed
Cyprus Netherlands on 27 September 2012
Līga KĮaviņa Harald Waiglein
Deputy State Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Director General for Economic Policy, appointed on 30 January 2015 Financial Markets and Customs Duties, Federal Ministry of Finance, appointed on 8 October 2012 Member of the Board Risk Committee since
Latvia Austria 9 October 2012, reappointed until 8 October 2019
Chairperson of the Board Risk Committee since 8 June 2018
Miglė Tuskienė Ricardo Mourinho Félix
Vice-Minister, Ministry of Finance, Deputy Finance Minister and Secretary appointed on 4 March 2015 of State for Finance, Ministry of Finance, appointed on 7 December 2015 Member of the Board Risk Committee since 7 April 2016, reappointed until 8 October 2019
Lithuania Portugal
Isabelle Goubin Katja Lautar
Director of the Treasury, Head of Department for General Government Ministry of Finance, Analysis and Coordination of Economic appointed on 19 March 2014 Policies, Ministry of Finance, Member of the Budget Review and appointed on 19 February 2019 Compensation Committee since replacing Gorazd Renčelj,
Luxembourg 24 April 2014, reappointed until 8 October 2021 Slovenia originally appointed on 10 February 2017
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 6 9
Peter Paluš
Head of Financial Unit at Permanent Representation of Slovakia to the European Union, appointed on 22 February 2017 Member of the Board Risk Committee since 8 February 2018,
Slovakia appointed until 8 October 2020
Tuomas Saarenheimo
Permanent Under-Secretary, Ministry of Finance, appointed on 12 September 2013
Finland
03
“The euro has become the second most important reserve currency in the world. We should promote its status as a strong currency since this will contribute to the economic well-being of the euro area countries. The ESM has a role to play in this respect by guaranteeing financial stability.”
HARTWIG LÖGER
Federal Minister of Finance, Austria, ESM Governor
7 0 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Board of Auditors
The Board of Auditors is an independent oversight Directors. Furthermore, the Chairperson of the Board body of the ESM. It inspects the ESM accounts and of Auditors met with the Chairperson of the Board of verifies that the operational accounts and the balance Governors and attended the Annual Meeting of the
sheet are in order. It also audits the regularity, compli Board of Governors to discuss the work and concluance, performance, and risk management of the ESM sions of the Board of Auditors. in accordance with international auditing standards and monitors the ESM internal and external audit pro During the year, the Board of Auditors also carried out cesses and their results. an independent audit of ESM consultancy expenses with the support of subject matter experts from the The Board of Auditors is composed of five members French Court of Auditors and of the internal control appointed by the Board of Governors in line with framework with the support of subject matter experts Article 24 of the By-Laws. New members of the Board from the European Court of Auditors. In fulfilling its of Auditors are appointed for a non-renewable term of role, the Board of Auditors also reviewed the ESM three years. In October 2018, the Board of Governors 2018 Financial Statements and the working papers of appointed Irena Petruškevičienė and Noel Camilleri the external auditor. to the Board of Auditors, replacing Jean Guill and Andrew Harkness whose terms had come to an In addition to its annual report in respect of the ESM end. Furthermore, the Board of Governors appointed financial statements included in the ESM annual Tommaso Fabi in April 2019 to replace Günter Borgel, report, the Board of Auditors also draws up an annual whose term had also come to an end. report to the Board of Governors which summarises its audit work and its recommendations for the In 2018, the Board of Auditors held 10 meetings at the respective year. ESM premises. During these meetings, ESM management and senior staff updated the Board of Auditors The Board of Auditors’ annual report, together with on recent ESM activities, the decisions of the ESM the ESM management comments in response to the governing bodies, and other relevant issues and develreport, are made available to the national parliaments, opments. The Board of Auditors met regularly with the the supreme audit institutions of the ESM Members, internal audit function, and monitored and reviewed the European Parliament, and the European Court of the work and independence of the external auditors. Auditors. The public can access these documents on In addition, the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the ESM website. the Board of Auditors met once with the ESM Board of
“The euro plays an important cohesive role in Europe. Its internationalisation will further enhance its contribution to stability and growth.”
ANDREJ BERTONCELJ
Minister of Finance, Slovenia, ESM Governor
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 7 1
Members of the Board of Auditors
Kevin Cardiff
Chairperson since 21 February 2017 Member since 17 December 2016 Appointed upon nomination by the European Court of Auditors.
François-Roger Cazala
Vice Chairperson since 21 February 2017 Member since 8 October 2016 Appointed upon nomination by the French Supreme Audit Institution.
Noel Camilleri
Member since 8 October 2018 Appointed upon nomination by the Supreme Audit Institution of Malta.
Irena Petruškevičienė
Member since 8 October 2018 Appointed upon proposal of the Chairperson of the Board of Governors.
03
Tommaso Fabi
Member since 1 April 2019 Appointed upon proposal of the Chairperson of the Board of Governors.
Note: In line with Article 24 of the By-Laws, two members are appointed upon proposal of the Chairperson of the Board of Governors, two members upon nomination by the supreme audit institutions of the ESM
Members based on a system of rotation, and one member by the European Court of Auditors.
7 2 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Internal control framework
The ESM internal control framework is embedded in ESMv daily operations and reflects the nature, complexity, and risks inherent in ESM activities. The ESM internal controls are underpinned by the three lines of defence governance model established by the Board of Directors and are aligned with the principles of the Basel Committee’s
Framework for Internal Control Systems in Banking Organisations. 21
21 Framework for Internal Control Systems in Banking Organisations, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel, September 1998.
ENTITY-LEVEL CONTROLS
Include management oversight and control culture, risk recognition and assessment, reliable information systems, availability of information relevant to decision making, and processes for monitoring and correcting deficiencies.
PROCESS-LEVEL CONTROLS
Include operational controls embedded in key processes and transactions.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) CONTROLS
Include IT general controls over the IT environment, computer operations, access to programs and data, program development, change management and automated transaction processing controls.
“The European Union is a global player. To strengthen our position in the rapidly changing environment, the euro needs to stay sound and well respected. To achieve this we need to complete the architecture of Economic and Monetary Union, push on with structural reforms, and invest into sustainable growth.”.
LADISLAV KAMENICKÝ
Minister of Finance, Slovakia, ESM Governor
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 7 3 | 7 3
“Strengthening the international role of the euro should be considered more of a positive spillover effect of strengthening Economic and Monetary Union than a goal in itself. While there are benefits from increasing trading in euro among euro area actors, companies need to be able to freely choose the currency they do business in.”
PETTERI ORPO
Minister of Finance, Finland, ESM Governor
The Board of Directors, directly and through the Board Internal audit provides an independent assurance
Risk Committee, is periodically updated on the state on the established internal controls and procedures of ESM’s internal controls. as part of the regular audit cycle. Internal audit independently
reviews the entity-level controls on an The Managing Director, under the direction of the annual basis.
Board of Directors, is responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the ESM internal control framework. The external auditor gains a sufficient understanding of Assisted by the Management Board, the Managing ESM internal controls to provide reasonable assurance
Director sets a strong tone from the top and oversees of the accuracy of the ESM’s financial statements. 03 03
internal controls across all areas of the ESM. Each year, the Managing Director issues a management There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of report on the state of internal controls to the Board any system of internal controls, including the possiof Directors (via the Board Risk Committee) and the bility of human error or circumvention of overriding Board of Auditors. controls. Therefore, even an effective internal control
framework can provide only reasonable assurance.
7 4 | 7 4 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
ESM organisational structure
Managing Director K. Regling
Head of Communications/ General Counsel Chief Spokesperson D. Eatough
-
W.Proissl
Head of
Internal Audit Head of Legal L. Lucas J. Aerts
Chief Risk Officer/
Head of Risk and Head of HR and Compliance Organisation C. Pacciani S. De Beule-Roloff
Secretary General Deputy MD and Chief Corporate K. Anev Janse Chief Finance Officer
Chief Economist
-
C.Frankel R. Strauch
Officer F. Blondeel
Head of Funding and Head of Investment Head of Economic and Head of Middle and Investor Relations and Treasury Market Analysis Back Office and
-
S.Ruhl S. Levy J. Rojas Portfolio Performance M. Hickey
Head of IT and Head of Finance Head of Strategy and Commercial Operations and Control Institutional Relations Legal and D. Wallace T. Pies N. Giammarioli Procurement
Head of ALM and
Lending Head of Banking P.-H. Floquet N. Mascher
Coordination
Head of Corporate Governance and Internal Policies F. Zinoecker
Member of the Management Board
Secondary reporting line
Visit our website for more information on our organisational structure and a description of the activities of the various departments .
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 7 5 | 7 5
As part of the ESM’s continued maturing process, the ESM, led by its extended leadership team, updated its mission statement in early 2019.
The ESM’s mission is to enable the countries
of the euro area to avoid and overcome
financial crises and to maintain long-term
financial stability and prosperity.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 7 7
04 Financial report
Balance sheet a May 2018 decision by the Council of the European
Union to impose a fine on Austria. 1 At year-end, the total ESM balance sheet was €807.1 billion. Compared to 31 December 2017, the balance The Profit before extraordinary items, which corresheet increased by €10.1 billion, mainly due to new loan sponds to the net income generated by ESM operadisbursements in 2018. The ESM disbursed €21.7 biltions, 2 decreased by €7.3 million, to €42.3 million in lion in loans to Greece and received early repayments 2018 from €49.6 million in 2017. Higher administrative from Spain of €8 billion. expenses and the continued effect of the negative interest
environment mainly drove this decrease, which was To provide financial assistance to the beneficiary Memin part offset by a higher result on financial operations. ber States, the ESM relies on its funding activity. In 2018, the total liability in respect of debts evidenced by certifi The interest income on debt securities held in the cates increased by €9.2 billion to €98.4 billion (€89.2 bilpaid-in capital portfolio increased by €17.0 million lion in 2017), reflecting the increase in lending activity. due to more investments at higher yield compared to
the cash remuneration rate. The Net profit of financial As of 31 December 2018, the total €80.5 billion of paid-in operations increased by €17.1 million to €44.3 million in capital is invested in debt securities or held in cash. 2018 from €27.2 million in 2017.
Unrealised gains or losses resulting from the valu Operating costs, including depreciation of fixed assets, ation of the security portfolio are reflected in the Fair were €67.5 million compared to €61.3 million in 2017. value reserve within the ESM’s equity position. As of The increase is mainly driven by additional staff cost 31 December 2018, this reserve was €140.2 million, as well as IT and advisory services. The ESM provides compared to €99.1 million as of 31 December 2017. administrative services to the EFSF and therefore The increase in the Fair value reserve mainly reflects the charges it service fees of €32.6 million (€30.9 million in appreciation of the investment’s values on the market 2017), which are recognised as Other operating income. compared to the previous year, largely due to changes The ESM continues to focus on budgetary discipline
in interest rates. and effective cost control. 04
Profit and loss account Outlook for 2019
The ESM recorded a net income of €284.7 million for Following the end of the programme for Greece in 2018, the financial year 2018, compared to €68.6 million no further loan disbursements are foreseen in 2019. in 2017. The ESM has actively diversified its investments and continues to look for additional measures to mitigate The €216.1 million increase is mainly due to the amount the impact of the negative yield environment, in line with received from Germany and France, compensating the its guidelines and its mandate. Nevertheless, the persis ESM for a part of the negative interest charged on the tence of this environment will continue to affect the net cash held at their national central banks in 2017. These income from ESM operations in 2019. payments, which represent €128.9 million and €86.7 million, respectively, were recorded as part of Extraordinary income together with €26.8 million that the ESM will receive from the European Commission, following
1 This fine imposed on Austria is a sanction pursuant to Article 8(1) Regulation (EU) No. 1173/2011. Such sanctions are collected by the European Commission and are assigned to the ESM.
2 The net income of the ESM is mainly driven by the interest margin on its lending activity and the return on the investment of its paidin capital. The ESM Pricing Policy defines the different elements of the total cost of a loan.
7 8 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Balance sheet
As at 31 December 2018 (in €‘000)
Notes 31.12.2018 31.12.2017
ASSETS
Cash in hand, balances with central banks and post
office banks 4 65,245,717 74,288,120
Loans and advances to credit institutions (a) other loans and advances 5 1,291,715 369,174 1,291,715 369,174
Loans and advances to euro area Member States 6 89,894,688 76,194,688
Debt securities including fixed-income securities 7
(a) issued by public bodies 8,327,012 10,971,804
(b) issued by other borrowers 17,255,918 9,918,880
25,582,930 20,890,684
Intangible assets 8 36 36
Tangible assets 9 7,207 4,664
Subscribed capital unpaid 2.15/15 624,250,300 624,250,300
Subscribed capital called but not paid 2.15/15 65,440 175,120
Prepayments and accrued income 10 777,929 820,833
Total assets 807,115,962 796,993,619
LIABILITIES
Amounts owed to credit institutions 11 277,202 32,600 Debts evidenced by certificates 12 (a) debt securities in issue 98,393,959 89,201,083 98,393,959 89,201,083 Other liabilities 13 9,503 8,488 Accruals and deferred income 14/27 1,147,623 789,576 Total liabilities 99,828,287 90,031,747
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Subscribed capital 2.15/15 704,798,700 704,798,700 Fair value reserve 7 140,174 99,119 Reserve fund 2.7.1/16 2,064,053 1,995,465 Profit for the financial year 284,748 68,588 Total shareholders’ equity 707,287,675 706,961,872
Total equity and liabilities 807,115,962 796,993,619
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements. The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 7 9
Off-balance sheet
As at 31 December 2018 (in €‘000)
Notes 31.12.2018 31.12.2017
OFF-BALANCE SHEET
Commitments 25 (a) undisbursed loans to euro area Member States - 45,774,339 - 45,774,339
Other items 3.6/26 (a) notional value of interest rate swaps - - receivable 62,372,500 36,512,000 - payable (62,372,500) (36,512,000) (b) notional value of cross-currency asset swaps - – - receivable 11,267,278 5,788,261 - payable (11,343,989) (5,730,986) (c) notional value of foreign exchange swaps - – - receivable 484,896 2,305,628 - payable (476,996) (2,048,620) (d) notional value of foreign exchange forwards - – - receivable - 1,363 - payable - (1,216)
04
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements. The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
8 0 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Profit and loss account
For the financial year ending 31 December 2018 (in €‘000)
Notes 2018 2017 Interest receivable and similar income
(a) on loans and advances to credit institutions 1,688 304 (b) on loans and advances to euro area Member States 17 1,189,777 938,764 (c) on debt securities including fixed-income securities 18 76,784 59,759 (d) on debts issued 102,783 95,744 (e) other 26 259,200 71,339 1,630,232 1,165,910
Interest payable and similar charges (a) on cash and cash equivalents 19 (301,295) (273,744) (b) on loans to credit institutions (2,450) (329) (c) on debts issued (779,038) (677,873) (d) on debt securities including fixed-income securities 18 (7,880) (7,937) (e) other 26 (508,420) (159,942) (1,599,083) (1,119,825) Commissions payable (19) (26) Other operating income 20 34,277 37,709 Net profit on financial operations 21/27 44,333 27,174 General administrative expenses (a) staff costs 22 (32,431) (31,166) - wages and salaries (23,419) (22,841) - social security (9,012) (8,325) of which relating to pension (7,924) (7,074) (b) other administrative expenses 23 (33,768) (29,019) (66,199) (60,185) Value adjustments in respect of intangible and tangible
assets (1,258) (1,099)
Profit before extraordinary items 42,283 49,658
Extraordinary income 24/27 242,465 18,930
Profit for the financial year 284,748 68,588
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 8 1
Statement of changes in equity
For the financial year ending 31 December 2018 (in €‘000)
Subscribed Fair value Profit brought Profit for the
capital reserve Reserve fund forward financial year Total
At 1 January 2017 704,798,700 183,194 1,426,701 - 568,764 706,977,359
Allocation of the profit of
2016 - - - 568,764 (568,764) -
Allocation of profit brought
forward to the reserve fund - - 568,764 (568,764) - -
Profit for the financial year - - - - 68,588 68,588 Change in fair value reserve - (84,075) - - - (84,075)
At 31 December 2017 704,798,700 99,119 1,995,465 - 68,588 706,961,872
Subscribed Fair value Profit brought Profit for the
capital reserve Reserve fund forward financial year Total
At 1 January 2018 704,798,700 99,119 1,995,465 - 68,588 706,961,872
Allocation of the profit of
2017 - - - 68,588 (68,588) -
Allocation of profit brought
forward to the reserve fund - - 68,588 (68,588) - -
Profit for the financial year - - - - 284,748 284,748 Change in fair value reserve - 41,055 - - - 41,055
At 31 December 2018 704,798,700 140,174 2,064,053 - 284,748 707,287,675
04
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
8 2 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Statement of cash flows
For the financial year ending 31 December 2018 (in €’000)
2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities: Profit for the financial year 284,748 68,588
Adjustments for value adjustments in respect of tangible and
intangible assets 1,258 1,099
Changes in tangible and intangible assets (3,801) (1,563) Changes in other liabilities 1,015 (3,580) Changes in accrued interest and interest received (1,286,894) (1,066,941) Changes in prepayments 190,185 (274,121) Changes in accruals and deferred income and interest paid 1,010,025 923,222 Interest received 1,139,613 971,712 Up-front service fee received 108,500 51,500 Interest paid (760,478) (647,877) Net cash flow provided by operating activities 684,171 22,039
Cash flows from investing activities Change in debt securities including fixed-income securities (4,651,191) 9,488,288 Change in loans and advances to credit institutions (922,541) (367,660) Net loans disbursed during the year (13,700,000) (3,461,738) Changes in amounts owed to credit institutions 244,602 32,600 Net cash flow provided/used in investing activities (19,029,130) 5,691,490
Cash flows from financing activities Payment of capital 109,680 109,680 Changes in debt securities in issue 9,192,876 3,542,115 Net cash flow provided by financing activities 9,302,556 3,651,795
Net increase/decrease in cash and cash equivalents (9,042,403) 9,365,324 Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year 74,288,120 64,922,796
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the financial year 65,245,717 74,288,120
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 8 3
Notes to the financial statements
1. General information
The European Stability Mechanism (“ESM”) was inaugurated on 8 October 2012 and established as an international financial institution with its registered office at 6a, Circuit de la Foire Internationale, L-1347 Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
The Finance Ministers of the then 17 euro area countries signed a first version of a Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism on 11 July 2011. A modified version, incorporating amendments aimed at improving the ESM’s effectiveness, was signed in Brussels on 2 February 2012 (“ESM Treaty”). The ESM Treaty entered into force on 27 September 2012 following ratification of the ESM Treaty by the then 17 euro area Member States.
Latvia joined the euro area on 1 January 2014. The Latvian parliament approved the ESM Treaty on 30 January
2014, and Latvia officially became the ESM’s 18th Member on 13 March 2014. The ESM Treaty was amended accordingly.
Lithuania joined the euro area on 1 January 2015. The Lithuanian parliament approved the ESM Treaty on 18
December 2014, and Lithuania officially became the ESM’s 19th Member on 3 February 2015. The ESM Treaty was amended accordingly.
The present financial statements cover the period from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018, while comparative figures cover the period from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017.
On a proposal from the Managing Director, the Board of Directors adopted the financial statements on 26 March
2019 and authorised their submission to the Board of Governors for approval at their 13 June 2019 meeting.
1.1. General overview of the financial assistance programmes
The ESM is authorised to use the following lending instruments for the benefit of its Members, subject to appropriate conditionality:
ƒ grant financial assistance in the form of loans to an ESM Member in the framework of a macroeconomic
adjustment programme; 04
ƒ purchase bonds or other debt securities in the primary debt market and conduct operations on the secondary debt market in relation to the bonds of an ESM Member;
ƒ grant precautionary financial assistance to ESM Members in the form of credit lines;
ƒ provide financial assistance for the recapitalisation of financial institutions through loans to ESM Members’ governments;
ƒ recapitalise systemic and viable euro area financial institutions directly under specific circumstances and as a last resort measure, following the 8 December 2014 ratification of a new instrument, the Direct Recapitalisation of Institutions.
1.2. Overview of the pricing structure of the financial assistance programmes
The total cost of financial assistance to a beneficiary Member State is an aggregate of several distinct elements that are established in the ESM Pricing Policy:
ƒ Base rate – the cost of funding incurred by the ESM, derived from a daily computation of the actual interest accrued on all bonds, bills, and other funding instruments issued by the ESM.
8 4 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
ƒ Commitment fee – the negative carry and issuance costs incurred in the period between the funding by the ESM and the disbursement to the beneficiary Member State, or for the period from the refinancing of the relevant funding instrument until its maturity. The commitment fee will be applied ex-post on the basis of the negative carry actually incurred.
ƒ Service fee – the source of general revenues and resources to cover the ESM’s operational costs. The service fee has two components:
ƒ up-front service fee (50 bps) generally deducted from the drawn amount,
ƒ annual service fee (0.5 bps) paid on the interest payment date.
ƒ Margin – paid on the interest payment date. The margin charged differs across financial support instruments.
ƒ 10 bps for loans and primary market support facilities;
ƒ 5 bps for secondary market support facilities;
ƒ 35 bps for precautionary financial assistance;
ƒ 30 bps for financial assistance provided to an ESM Member for the recapitalisation of its financial institutions.
In addition, the ESM Pricing Policy includes specific elements tied to financial assistance for the Direct Recapitalisation of Institutions. This instrument is currently not used. The specific elements are detailed in the ESM Pricing Policy.
Penalty interest may be applied to overdue amounts, which corresponds to a charge of 200 bps over the higher of either the Euribor rate applicable to the relevant period selected by the ESM or the interest rate which would
have been payable.
1.3. ESM financial assistance to Spain
The Eurogroup, composed of the Finance Ministers of the euro area countries, reached political agreement on 20 July 2012 that financial assistance should be granted to Spain for the recapitalisation of its banking sector, following an official request from the Spanish government. The financial assistance was designed to cover the estimated capital requirements along with an additional safety margin, amounting to €100 billion. The loans were provided to Spain’s bank recapitalisation fund, Fondo de Restructuración Ordenado Bancaria (FROB), and then channelled to the relevant financial institutions. The assistance was initially committed under a European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) programme. On 28 November 2012, the ESM Board of Governors decided that
the ESM would assume this commitment, in line with Article 40(1) and (2) of the ESM Treaty.
This was the ESM’s first financial assistance programme. It was also the first use of the instrument for recapitalising banks through loans granted to a government. No other lenders contributed.
On 3 December 2012, the Spanish government formally requested the disbursement of €39.5 billion in funds. On 5 December 2012, the ESM launched and priced notes, which were transferred to the FROB on 11 December 2012. The FROB used the notes in the amount of €37.0 billion for the recapitalisation of the following banks: BFA-Bankia, Catalunya-Caixa, NCG Banco, and Banco de Valencia. The FROB also provided €2.5 billion to Sareb, the asset management company, for assets arising from bank restructuring.
The Spanish government formally requested a second disbursement of €1.8 billion for the recapitalisation of Banco Mare Nostrum, Banco Ceiss, Caja 3 and Liberbank on 28 January 2013. The ESM subsequently transferred
the funds in the form of ESM notes to the FROB on 5 February 2013.
The ESM financial assistance programme expired on 31 December 2013. In total, the ESM disbursed €41.3 billion to Spain to recapitalise the banking sector. The remaining undisbursed amount of the facility was cancelled.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 8 5
On 7 July 2014, the ESM Board of Directors approved Spain’s request to make an early repayment of €1.3 billion of its loan. This was the first time that a euro area country under a financial assistance programme made an early repayment request. The repayment took place on 8 July 2014 and was accompanied by a scheduled repayment of unused funds of €0.3 billion on 23 July 2014.
The ESM received two further early repayment requests from the Spanish authorities in 2015. The authorities submitted the first request on 27 February 2015. The ESM Board of Directors approved this €1.5 billion early repayment request on 9 March 2015 and the repayment took place on 17 March 2015. On 2 July 2015, the ESM Board of Directors approved another early repayment request from the Spanish government. This €2.5 billion repayment took place on 14 July 2015.
On 11 November 2016, the ESM received the fourth early repayment from Spain of €1 billion, which was approved by the ESM Board of Directors on 7 November 2016.
The ESM received two further early repayment requests from the Spanish authorities in 2017. On 14 June 2017, the ESM received the fifth early repayment from Spain of €1 billion, which was approved by the ESM Board of Directors on 1 June 2017. Subsequently on 5 October 2017, the ESM received the request for the sixth early repayment from Spain of €2 billion, which was approved by the ESM Board of Directors on 26 October 2017 and the repayment took place on 16 November 2017.
On 30 January 2018 Spain made the request for two further early repayments. On 23 February 2018 and 23 May
2018, the ESM received respectively the seventh and eighth early repayments from Spain of €2 billion and €3 billion, which were approved by the ESM Board of Directors on 8 February 2018. On 16 October 2018, the ESM received the ninth early repayment from Spain of €3 billion, which was approved by the ESM Board of Directors on 20 September 2018.
By 31 December 2018, Spain had, in total, repaid €17.6 billion of its financial assistance. All repayments were made in cash.
The outstanding nominal amount of loans granted to Spain as at 31 December 2018 is €23.7 billion (refer to note 6).
1.4. ESM financial assistance to Cyprus
The Cypriot government requested stability support on 25 June 2012. In response, the Eurogroup agreed the key
elements of a macroeconomic adjustment programme on 25 March 2013. 04
The agreement on the macroeconomic adjustment programme led euro area members to decide on a financial assistance package of up to €10 billion. On 24 April 2013, the ESM Board of Governors decided to grant stability support to Cyprus. The ESM Board of Directors subsequently approved the Financial Assistance Facility Agreement (FFA) on 8 May 2013. The ESM disbursed €6.3 billion, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) contributed around €1 billion. Cyprus exited successfully from its ESM programme on 31 March 2016.
According to the terms of the FFA, the first tranche of financial assistance was provided to Cyprus in two separate disbursements: the ESM disbursed the first €2 billion on 13 May 2013, and transferred the second in the amount of €1 billion on 26 June 2013. The second tranche of assistance, €1.5 billion of ESM floating rate notes, was disbursed on 27 September 2013. The Cypriot government used the notes for the recapitalisation of the cooperative banking sector. The third tranche of assistance, €0.1 billion, was disbursed on 19 December 2013. Disbursements of a total of €1.1 billion were made in 2014, and another €0.6 billion in 2015.
The financial assistance facility was designed to cover Cyprus’s financing needs after including proceeds from burden-sharing measures that the Cypriot government adopted for the banking sector. These needs included budgetary financing, the redemption of medium- and long-term debt, and the recapitalisation of financial institutions. They excluded the country’s two largest banks, Bank of Cyprus and Cyprus Popular Bank, which the Cypriot government subjected to restructuring and resolution measures.
The outstanding nominal amount of loans granted to Cyprus as at 31 December 2018 is €6.3 billion (refer to note 6).
8 6 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
1.5. ESM financial assistance to Greece
The EFSF financial assistance programme for Greece expired on 30 June 2015. On 8 July 2015, the Greek government submitted a request for financial assistance to the Chairperson of the ESM Board of Governors. On 13 July 2015, the euro area ministers of finance agreed with Greece a set of urgent prior actions in order to start negotiations for a new programme under the ESM. The ESM Board of Governors finally approved a new programme on 19 August 2015. The ESM Boards of Governors and Directors approved also the financial assistance facility agreement (FFA) with Greece. The ESM was authorised to provide Greece with up to €86 billion in financial assistance over three years. Greece successfully exited its programme in August 2018.
The ESM programme focussed on four key areas: restoring fiscal sustainability, safeguarding financial stability, boosting growth, competitiveness and investment, and reforming the public administration. The funds available
under the FFA were earmarked to cover needs related to debt servicing, banking sector recapitalisation and resolution and budget financing. To return its economy to growth and make its debt burden more sustainable, the Greek government committed to a series of far-reaching economic reforms.
On 20 August 2015, the ESM approved the first tranche of €26 billion in financial assistance for Greece, divided in two sub-tranches. This decision followed the ESM Board of Directors’ approval of the FFA, specifying the terms of the financial assistance. The Board of Directors also decided to immediately disburse €13 billion in cash to Greece. This was the first disbursement under the first sub-tranche, of €16 billion, to be used for budget financing and debt servicing needs. The second sub-tranche, of €10 billion, was immediately created in ESM floating rate
notes and held in a segregated account. These funds were designated to cover the Greek banking sector’s potential resolution and recapitalisation costs, with release decisions to be taken on a case-by-case basis.
On 23 November 2015, the Board of Directors authorised the disbursement of €2 billion in cash to Greece as the second disbursement under the €16 billion sub-tranche approved in August 2015. This decision followed the Greek government’s completion of the first set of reform milestones. This disbursement was primarily used for
debt servicing.
On 1 December 2015, the Board of Directors decided to release €2.7 billion to Greece to recapitalise Piraeus Bank. Subsequently, on 8 December 2015, the Board of Directors decided to release €2.7 billion to Greece to recapitalise the National Bank of Greece. The ESM transferred these amounts under the €10 billion sub-tranche, held in ESM
notes in a segregated account. The availability period of the remaining €4.6 billion expired on 31 January 2016.
On 22 December 2015, the Board of Directors approved the disbursement of €1 billion to Greece as the third and final disbursement under the €16 billion sub-tranche agreed in August 2015. This decision followed the Greek government’s completion of the second set of reform milestones. This disbursement was also used for debt servicing.
On 17 June 2016, the Board of Directors approved the disbursement of €7.5 billion to Greece as the first disbursement under the second tranche of €10.3 billion. This disbursement was used for debt servicing and to help clear domestic arrears.
On 25 October 2016, the Board of Directors approved the disbursement of €2.8 billion to Greece as the second disbursement under the second tranche of €10.3 billion. This €2.8 billion disbursement consisted of two parts: €1.1 billion was approved for release following the full implementation of a set of 15 milestones by the Greek
authorities, and was used for debt servicing. A further €1.7 billion was disbursed to a dedicated account for clearing arrears after a positive assessment of the clearance of net arrears by Greece.
On 20 January 2017, the ESM Board of Directors approved three schemes aimed at reducing interest rate risk for Greece. The first was a bond exchange, where floating rate notes disbursed by the ESM to Greece for bank recapitalisation were exchanged for fixed coupon notes. The second scheme allowed the ESM to enter into swap arrangements to reduce the risk that Greece would have to pay a higher interest rate on its loans when market rates start rising. The third scheme, which entailed issuing long-term bonds that closely matched the maturity of
the Greek loans, was replaced by additional swap arrangements.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 8 7
On 20 February 2017, the ESM received a loan repayment of €2 billion from the Greek government. The repayment was a contractual obligation with the ESM and followed the sale of an asset by one of the banks that took part in the 2015 banking recapitalisation, financed with ESM loans.
On 7 July 2017, the ESM Board of Directors approved the first disbursement of the €7.7 billion under the third tranche of €8.5 billion. Out of this amount, €6.9 billion was used for debt servicing needs and €0.8 billion for arrears clearance.
On 26 October 2017, the ESM Board of Directors approved the disbursement of €0.8 billion to Greece for the clearance of arrears.
On 27 March 2018, the ESM Board of Directors approved the fourth tranche of €6.7 billion to Greece for debt service, domestic arrears clearance and for establishing a cash buffer. The ESM Board of Directors approved the release of the first disbursement under this tranche amounting to €5.7 billion, which took place on 28 March 2018.
On 14 June 2018, the ESM Board of Directors authorised the release of the remaining amount of the fourth tranche of ESM financial assistance, approved on 27 March 2018. The disbursement of €1 billion was used for the clearance of arrears.
On 6 August 2018 the ESM disbursed the fifth and final tranche of ESM financial assistance for Greece, amounting to €15 billion. Out of this tranche, €9.5 billion was used for building up Greece’s cash buffer and €5.5 billion was used for debt service. After the disbursement, the cash buffer reached around €24 billion. That sum will cover around 22 months of Greece’s financing needs after the end of the programme on 20 August 2018.
On 20 August 2018 Greece officially concluded its three-year ESM financial assistance programme with a successful exit. This follows the disbursement of a total of €61.9 billion by the ESM over three years in support of macroeconomic adjustment and bank recapitalisation in Greece. The remaining €24.1 billion available under the maximum €86 billion programme volume was not utilised and automatically cancelled.
The outstanding nominal amount of loans granted to Greece as at 31 December 2018 is €59.9 billion (refer to note 6).
2. Summary of significant accounting policies
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these financial statements are set out below.
04
2.1. Basis of presentation
The accompanying financial statements are prepared and presented in accordance with Directive 86/635/EEC of the Council of the European Communities of 8 December 1986 on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions, as amended by Directive 2001/65/EC of 27 September 2001, by Directive 2003/51/EC of 18 June 2003 and by Directive 2006/46/EC of 14 June 2006 (the ‘Directives’). Their specific application by the ESM is described in the subsequent notes.
The ESM prepares an annual report in respect of each financial year and submits it to the Board of Governors for approval at its annual meeting. The annual report contains a description of the policies and activities of the ESM, the financial statements for the relevant financial year, the report of the external auditors in respect of their audit in respect of said financial statements, and the report of the Board of Auditors in respect of said financial statements pursuant to Article 24(6) of the ESM By-Laws.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with the Directives requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management 3 to exercise its judgement in applying the ESM’s accounting policies. Areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements are disclosed in Note 2.3.
3 As per Article 7 (5) of the ESM Treaty, the Managing Director shall conduct, under the direction of the Board of Directors, the current business of the ESM. As per Article 21 (1) of the ESM By-Laws, the Board of Directors shall keep the accounts of the ESM and draw up its annual accounts.
8 8 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
2.2. Basis of measurement
The accompanying financial statements are prepared on a historical cost basis, except for the loans and advances to euro area Member States and the debts evidenced by certificates which are measured at amortised cost, and the paid-in capital and reserve fund investments which are measured at fair value with gains and losses
recognised in the fair value reserve.
2.3. Use of estimates
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported income, expenses, assets, liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The use of available information and application of judgement are inherent to the formation of estimates. Actual results in
the future could differ from such estimates and the resulting differences may be material to the financial statements. Any revision to accounting estimates is recognised prospectively in current and future periods.
The ESM is entitled to charge 50 bps of up-front service and 0.5 bps annual service fees to the beneficiary Member States, to cover the ESM’s operational costs, as Note 1.2 describes. The ESM recognises the up-front service fees over a seven year period, to reflect the expected occurrences of the expenses that it aims to cover.
The ESM reviews its loans and advances to beneficiary Member States at each reporting date, to assess whether a value adjustment is required (see also Note 2.8.). Such assessment requires judgement by the management and the ESM governing bodies, consistent with the ESM’s mandate as a permanent crisis resolution mechanism
that aims at supporting beneficiary Member States’ return to public financial stability.
No value adjustment was required as at 31 December 2018 and 2017, thus none has been recorded.
2.4. Foreign currency translation
The ESM uses the euro (€) as the unit of measure of its accounts and for presenting its financial statements.
Foreign currency transactions are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing on the date of the transaction. Exchange differences, if any, arising out of transactions settled during the year are recognised in the profit and
loss account as ‘Net profit or loss on financial operations’.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated at the closing exchange rates on that date.
Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates on the dates of the initial transactions. Non-monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign
currency are translated using the exchange rates on the date when the fair value was determined.
The exchange differences, if any, are recognised in the profit and loss account and the related assets and liabilities are revalued on the balance sheet.
2.5. Derivative financial instruments
The ESM uses derivatives instruments for risk management purposes only. Cross-currency asset swaps and foreign exchange swaps and forwards are used to hedge the currency risk into euro 4 (refer to Note 3.3.2), and
interest rate swaps to manage the interest rate risk exposure (refer Note 3.3.1).
All derivatives transactions are booked at notional as off-balance sheet items at the date of the transaction.
4 As per Article 2 (5) of the ESM Guidelines on the Investment Policy, any currency risk shall be hedged into euro to ensure a limited remaining foreign exchange risk for the ESM.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 8 9
2.5.1. Foreign exchange swaps and forwards
For the management of the paid-in capital portfolio activities, the ESM enters into foreign exchange swap and forwards in order to hedge back in euro the cash flow’s currency risk of a non-euro denominated investment with a residual maturity of less than 2 years. Ongoing forward and spot exchange transactions are converted at the spot rates of exchange prevailing at reporting date and neutralised in ‘Accruals and deferred income’ or ‘Prepayments and accrued income’. The spread between the spot amount and forward settlement amount is linearly amortised through the profit and loss account in ‘Interest receivable and similar income’ or ‘Interest payable and similar charges’. On the maturity date, the parties exchange the initial principal amounts at the contractual exchange rate. The difference between the spot and the forward rate at maturity is recognised under the caption ‘Interest receivable and similar income’ or ‘Interest payable and similar charges’ in the profit and loss account.
2.5.2. Cross-currency asset swaps and interest rate swaps
The ESM enters into cross-currency asset swaps in order to cover floating or fixed rates in different currencies in its paid-in capital portfolio as well as issuances in USD. In a cross-currency asset swap, payments are exchanged based on either two floating reference rates, one floating rate and one fixed rate, or two fixed rates, each with a corresponding notional amount denominated in a different currency from a given security (the asset). Notional amounts are exchanged on the effective date and the maturity date. Ongoing forward and spot exchange transactions are converted at the spot rates of exchange prevailing on the balance sheet date and neutralised in ‘Accruals and deferred income’ or ‘Prepayments and accrued income’.
The spread between the spot amount and forward settlement amount is linearly amortised through the profit and loss account in ‘Interest receivable and similar income’ or ‘Interest payable and similar charges’. Interest payments exchanged are also included in ‘Interest receivable and similar income’ or ‘Interest payable and similar charges’ in the profit and loss account.
An interest rate swap is a contract under which floating-rate interest is exchanged for fixed-rate interest or viceversa. Interest received and paid under interest rate swaps are accrued and reported under ‘Interest receivable and similar income’ or ‘Interest payable and similar charges’ in the profit and loss account.
On the maturity date the difference between the payable and the receivable interest is recognised under the caption ‘Interest receivable and similar income’ or ‘Interest payable and similar charges’ in the profit and loss account.
All interest rate swaps and cross-currency asset swaps are concluded under the contractual framework of ISDA 04
swap agreements and Credit Support Annexes (CSA), which specify the conditions of exposure collateralisation, in order to offset mark-to-market fluctuations on a daily basis through the exchange of collateral. These are generally accepted and practised contract types (see also Note 3.6.3).
The cash collateral received or posted is reported under ‘Amounts owed to credit institutions’ or ‘Loans and advances to credit institutions’.
2.6. Cash in hand, balances with central banks and post office banks
Cash in hand, balances with central banks and post office banks include cash in hand, demand deposits and other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Bank overdrafts, if any, are shown within borrowings in liabilities on the balance sheet.
2.7. Debt securities including fixed-income securities
The ESM has established the following portfolios for the management of its financial assets:
9 0 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
2.7.1. Paid-in capital and reserve fund investments
The ESM’s capital provisions are laid down in Chapter 3 of the ESM Treaty. The initial aggregate nominal value of paid-in shares was €80 billion and has been increased to €80.5 billion due to the accession of Latvia and Lithuania. The net income generated by ESM operations and the proceeds of the financial sanctions received from the ESM Members under the multilateral surveillance procedure, the excessive deficit procedure, and the macro-economic imbalances procedure established under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) are put aside in a reserve fund, in accordance with Chapter 5 of the ESM Treaty.
The paid-in capital and the reserve fund are invested in accordance with the ESM Investment Guidelines approved by the Board of Directors. The main objectives of such investments is to ensure that the maximum lending volume is always readily available, and to absorb potential losses.
According to the investment principles defined in the Investment Guidelines, an appropriate level of diversification of the investment portfolios shall be maintained to reduce the ESM’s overall risk. Diversification shall be attained through allocation between various asset classes, geographical areas (and notably supranational institutions, and issuers outside the euro area), issuers and instruments.
According to the Investment Guidelines, any currency risk shall be hedged into euro to ensure a limited remaining foreign exchange risk for the ESM. Derivatives shall be used for risk management purposes only (refer to Note
3.6.2).
The paid-in capital and the reserve fund investments are managed in the same portfolio. As the Investment Guidelines specify, the paid-in capital is divided in Short-term tranche and the Medium and long-term tranche. The
assets of the reserve fund are invested in full in the short-term tranche:
Short-term tranche
The tranche with the highest liquidity requirements is the short-term tranche. The main objective of the shortterm tranche is to enable the ESM to face any temporary disbursement to cover any liquidity shortfall, due to a non-payment by a beneficiary Member State. This tranche is invested in liquid investment instruments with a capital preservation objective at a one-year horizon, with a high level of confidence.
Medium- and long-term tranche
The main objective of the medium- and long-term tranche is to ensure the ESM’s financial strength. This tranche is managed to enhance the return of the paid-in capital and is subject to the constraints specified in
the Investment Guidelines. This tranche is also mainly invested in liquid instruments.
The paid-in capital and the reserve fund investments are initially recognised at fair value including any transaction costs, and measured subsequently at fair value with gains and losses recognised in the fair value reserve, except for impairment losses and foreign exchange gains and losses, until the financial asset is derecognised. Unrealised gains or losses are accumulated in the fair value reserve until the asset is sold, collected or otherwise disposed of, or until the asset is determined to be impaired.
If the financial asset is determined to be impaired, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in the ‘Fair value reserve’ is recognised in the profit and loss account. Interest, however, is recognised on a straight-line basis.
2.7.2. Liquidity buffer investments
The ESM’s borrowing strategy must meet several objectives and principles to comply with the purpose established in Article 3 of the ESM Treaty. The general borrowing strategy must therefore offer the possibility to react rapidly to unexpected market developments, including the build-up of liquidity buffers and ensure market access, even in a difficult market environment.
As per the ESM Investment Guidelines, the management of the liquidity buffer follows the same investment
restrictions as the short-term tranche of the paid-in capital described in Note 2.7.1.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 9 1
2.7.3. Determination of fair value
For financial instruments traded in active markets, the determination of fair values for financial assets and financial liabilities is based on quoted market prices or dealer price quotations.
A financial instrument is considered to be trading in an active market if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service or regulatory agency, and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis.
Where the fair values of financial instruments recorded on the balance sheet cannot be derived from active markets, they are determined using valuation techniques that include the use of mathematical models. The chosen valuation techniques incorporate factors that market participants would take into account in pricing a transaction and are based whenever possible on observable market data. If such data is not available, a degree of judgement is required in establishing fair values.
2.8. Loans and advances to credit institutions and to euro area Member States
Loans and advances are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not traded on an active market. Loans and advances are initially recognised at their net disbursement amounts, and subsequently measured at amortised cost.
Transaction costs and premiums/discounts are amortised in the profit and loss account through interest receivable and similar income. Interest income on loans and advances to credit institutions and to euro area Member States are also included in ’Interest receivable and similar income’ in the profit and loss account.
Specific value adjustments are accounted for in the profit and loss account in respect of loans and advances presenting objective evidence that all or part of their outstanding balance is not recoverable (refer to Note 2.3) and are deducted from the corresponding asset in the balance sheet.
The underlying securities purchased under the agreements to resell (“reverse repos”) are not recognised on the balance sheet while the consideration paid is recorded as loans and advances to credit institutions as appropriate and carried at the amounts of the cash advanced on the balance sheet. The counterparties enter into an irrevocable commitment to complete the operation on a date and a price fixed at the outset. The difference between the sale and the repurchase price is treated as interest and recognised over the life of the agreement (refer to Note 5).
04
2.9. Intangible assets
Intangible assets are recorded on the balance sheet at their acquisition cost, less accumulated amortisation.
Amortisation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated life of each item purchased. Intangible assets comprise computer software that are amortised within three years.
2.10. Tangible assets
Tangible assets are recorded on the balance sheet at their acquisition cost, less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated life of each item purchased, as set out below:
ƒ permanent equipment, fixtures and fittings: nine years or until the end of building rent period;
ƒ furniture and office equipment: five years;
ƒ IT equipment: three years.
9 2 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
If works performed on leased properties are capitalised (as fixture and fittings) then the estimated life of those assets should not exceed the duration of the lease agreement.
2.11. Prepayments and accrued income
Prepayments and accrued income are related either to invoices received and paid in advance for expenses related to subsequent reporting periods, or to any income related to the reporting period which will only be received in the course of a subsequent financial year. It includes the spot revaluation, the spread amortisation and also the
accrued interest income of ongoing derivative transactions (refer to Note 2.5).
2.12. Amounts owed to credit institutions
Amounts owed to credit institutions are presented in the financial statements at their redemption amounts. Transaction costs and premiums/discounts are amortised in the profit and loss account through interest payable
and similar charges/income. Interest expense on amounts owed to credit institutions are also included in ’Interest payable and similar charges’ in the profit and loss account.
The underlying securities sold under the repurchase agreements (“repos”) are not recognised on the balance sheet while the consideration received is recorded as amounts owed to credit institutions as appropriate and carried at the amounts of the cash received on the balance sheet. The counterparties enter into an irrevocable commitment to complete the operation on a date and a price fixed at the outset. The difference between the sale
and the repurchase price is treated as interest and recognised over the life of the agreement (refer to Note 11).
2.13. Debts evidenced by certificates
Debts evidenced by certificates are presented at their amortised cost. Transaction costs and premiums/discounts are amortised in the profit and loss account through ‘Interest payable and similar charges’. Interest expenses on
debt instruments are also included in ‘Interest payable and similar charges’ in the profit and loss account.
2.14. Provisions
Provisions are intended to cover liabilities, the nature of which are clearly defined and which at the date of the balance sheet are either likely to be incurred, or certain to be incurred but uncertain as to the amount or as to the
date on which they will arise.
Where there are similar obligations, the likelihood that an outflow will be required in settlement is determined by considering the class of obligations as a whole.
2.15. Subscribed capital
On 31 December 2018, the ESM’s shareholders were the 19 euro area Member States. In accordance with Article 8 of the ESM Treaty, the authorised capital is €704.8 billion, which is divided into 7,047,987 shares, with a nominal value of €100,000 each. The authorised capital was subscribed by the shareholders according to the contribution key provided in Article 11 and calculated in Annex I of the ESM Treaty. The authorised capital is divided into paid-in shares and callable shares, where the total aggregate nominal value of paid-in shares is €80.5 billion.
In accordance with Article 4 of Directive 86/635/EEC as amended, the authorised capital stock is recognised in equity as subscribed capital. The callable shares are presented as ‘Subscribed capital unpaid’ on the asset side of the balance sheet. Called capital not yet paid by the shareholders is recognised on the asset side of the balance
sheet as ‘Subscribed capital called but not paid’.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 9 3
2.16. Accruals and deferred income
Accruals and deferred income are related to payments received before the balance sheet date but not exclusively related to the reporting period, together with any charges which, though relating to the financial year in question will only be paid in a subsequent financial year. It also includes the spot revaluation and spread amortisation of ongoing derivative transactions (refer to Note 2.5).
2.17. Interest receivable and payable
Interest income and expenses for all interest-bearing financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on an accrual basis within ‘Interest receivable and similar income’ and ’Interest payable and similar charges’ in the profit and loss account.
Once a financial asset or a group of similar financial assets has been written down as a result of an impairment loss, interest income is recognised using the rate of interest applied to discount the future cash flows for the purpose of measuring the impairment loss.
On the balance sheet, accrued interest receivable is included in ‘Prepayments and accrued income’ under assets while accrued interest payable is included in ‘Accruals and deferred income’ under liabilities.
2.18. Employee benefits
The ESM operates a pension plan with defined contribution characteristics funded through payments to an external insurance company. This insurance scheme also covers the risk of death and disability.
The pension plan is funded by contributions from the employer as well as from the employees. The plan is accounted for as a defined contribution plan and corresponding payments are recognised as employee benefit expenses as they fall due.
2.19. Compensation payments from ESM Members
Payments received from a Member State as compensation for expenses or losses (refer to Note 27) incurred in a previous period are recorded as extraordinary income in profit or loss of the period in which they become
receivable. Such compensation payments are made with a view to capital preservation and are granted on a 04
case-by-case basis, subject to conditions not controlled by the ESM. Therefore, a receivable is evidenced either through a notification of the payment or the respective transfer of money.
2.20. Taxation
Within the scope of its official activities, the ESM, its assets, income, property and its operations and transactions shall be exempt from all direct taxes under Article 36 of the ESM Treaty. ESM Members have agreed to remit or refund all indirect taxation, subject to certain exceptions under the same provision of the ESM Treaty.
3. Risk management
This section presents information about the approach of the ESM to risk management and risk controls and its risk exposure, in relation to the primary risks associated with its use of financial instruments. These are:
ƒ credit risk
ƒ market risk,
ƒ liquidity risk, and
ƒ operational risk.
9 4 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
3.1. Risk management organisation
The ESM follows a prudent approach to risk-taking to limit potential losses and to ensure continuity in fulfilling its mandate and meeting its commitments.
According to the ESM’s High Level Principles for Risk Management, the targeted risk appetite should preserve the ESM’s funding capacity, ensure the highest creditworthiness, and avoid unexpected capital calls. The Risk Policy describes the risk appetite and the framework for identifying, assessing, monitoring and managing risks
consistent with the risk appetite. It covers all ESM financial and non-financial risks, and both on- and, if applicable, off-balance sheet items. The risk profile is defined by a set of limits to curtail all types of risks within the risk appetite. The ESM does not aim at generating profit on financial support granted to beneficiary Member States and does not provide incentives for speculative exposures on its investment portfolio.
The ESM operates under the principles of the three lines of defence approach: departments and business functions assume direct responsibility for day-to-day risk management. All staff are responsible for ensuring that risks relating to their operations are identified, followed up, and reported to Risk & Compliance. Risk & Compliance exercises central oversight of risk and ensures that all business functions, comprehensively and consistently, implement the risk management framework.
The Managing Director bears full accountability for the implementation and functioning of the risk management framework, adequate reporting to the Board of Directors, and for further developing the Risk Policy.
The Chief Risk Officer is the head of the Risk & Compliance team and reports directly to the Managing Director. The Chief Risk Officer is responsible and accountable for informing the Managing Director on all risks which the
institution may face to ensure enforcement and oversight. The Managing Director reports risk-related information to the Board of Directors, principally through the Board Risk Committee.
To support the implementation of the ESM’s risk policies, an Internal Risk Committee (IRC) has been created. The IRC translates the risk appetite into an internal limit structure, which is described in the Risk Policy approved by the Board of Directors. The IRC assists the Board of Directors in ensuring the adequacy of the ESM’s internal limit
structure and limit setting, providing recommendations on changes to the internal limit structure, on the identification of relevant risks, and on the suitability of methods to monitor and manage them. On a periodical basis, the IRC conducts a risk self-assessment and reports the result to the Managing Director.
3.2. Credit risk
Credit risk is defined as the potential for loss arising from the inability of a counterparty, issuer, insurer or other obligor to fulfil its contractual obligations for full value when due. Counterparty risk is considered a particular form of credit risk and derives from lending and support operations to beneficiary Member States, investment of paid-in capital, placement of possible excess liquidity, and hedging operations. Issuer risk is also a particular
form of credit risk and derives from investment in securities of the paid-in capital and excess liquidity. Credit concentration risk is defined as the potential for loss arising from undiversified, correlated exposure to a particular group of counterparties.
Given the nature of the ESM’s mandate, where credit risk from lending arises as a result of support to beneficiary Member States under a FFA, the credit risk in the ESM’s lending exposure is accepted. Note 3.2.4 below further
describes the ESM’s treatment of loans to euro area Member States.
3.2.1. Exposure to credit risk without taking into account any collateral or other credit enhancements
The following table shows the direct exposure to credit risk for the components of the balance sheet. For on-balance-sheet positions, these exposures are based on net carrying amounts as reported on the balance sheet.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 9 5
Exposure Exposure (in €‘000) 31.12.2018 31.12.2017
Cash in hand, balances with central banks and post office banks 65,245,717 74,288,120 Loans and advances to credit institutions 1,291,715 369,174 Debt securities including fixed-income securities 25,582,930 20,890,684
On balance sheet credit risk exposure 92,120,362 95,547,978 Exposure at default on derivatives (1) 1,582,340 1,162,930 Credit risk exposure 93,702,702 96,710,908
1 The cash-collateral is included in the calculation of the Exposure at Default and reported as exposure in the On balance sheet items.
This table does not include the loans and advances to euro area Member States as the ESM does not manage the credit risk on beneficiary Member States, while it monitors its exposures through the Early Warning System, as described in Note 3.2.4.
3.2.2. Risk profile of counterparties and issuers
The following tables show the breakdown of the financial assets by credit rating. For ‘Debt securities including fixed-income securities’, the credit ratings of individual issuances (or in the case of short-term securities their long-term rating equivalents) are presented. If issuance ratings are unavailable, the issuers rating is presented. For other financial assets, the credit ratings of the counterparties are presented.
These tables do not include the breakdown of the ‘Loans and advances to euro area Member States’, as the ESM risk function does not manage the inherent risk of non-payment of the beneficiary Member States, as described in Note 3.2.
Clean carrying value (in €’000) Credit rating (1) 31.12.2018
Cash in hand, balances with central banks and post office banks not rated (2) 65,243,078 AA 2,639
Loans and advances to credit institutions not rated (3) 263,462 AA 1,603
AA- 227,480 04
A+ 108,140 A 691,030
Debt securities including fixed-income securities not rated - AAA 14,233,063 AA+ 1,504,603 AA 2,622,472 AA- 1,916,056 A+ 283,318 A 5,023,418
Total 92,120,362
-
(1)Based on the lowest rating provided by the major rating agencies (Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch) presented based on the rating scale used by Fitch. (2) “Not rated” means balances placed with Eurosystem central banks, which are not rated. (3) “Not rated” means balances (Reverse Repos) placed with Eurex Clearing, which is not rated.
9 6 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Clean carrying value (in €’000) Credit rating (1) 31.12.2017
Cash in hand, balances with central banks and post office banks not rated (2) 74,285,731 AA 2,389
Loans and advances to credit institutions not rated (2) - AA 101,514 AA- 62,120 A+ 55,600 A 149,940
Debt securities including fixed-income securities not rated - AAA 12,129,744 AA+ 1,246,238 AA 1,566,053 AA- 1,244,951 A+ 177,703 A 4,525,995
Total 95,547,978
-
(1)Based on the lowest rating provided by the major rating agencies (Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch) presented based on the rating scale used by Fitch. (2) “Not rated” means balances placed with Eurosystem central banks, which are not rated.
3.2.3. Credit risk on debt securities including fixed-income securities
The ESM invests in assets that fulfil the high credit risk standards set by the Investment Guidelines require. To mitigate the credit risk on its investments, the ESM has also established a detailed structure of credit limits. The
ESM measures credit exposures and monitors limit compliance daily.
3.2.4. Credit risk in relation to loans to euro area Member States
The ESM, as per its mandate, grants financial assistance to euro area Member States experiencing severe financial problems, if indispensable to safeguard the financial stability of the euro area as a whole and of its Members. The assistance, therefore, aims at providing financial support according to rules that differ from those of financial markets, given that the overall aim is to support the beneficiary Member State’s return to public financial stability.
The determination and close monitoring of debt sustainability and conditionality attached to all financial assistance to beneficiary Member States, as negotiated with the European Commission in liaison with the European Central Bank (ECB) and whenever possible the IMF, are aimed at addressing and substantially reducing credit risk. It is the mutual understanding of the ESM Members that ESM loans enjoy preferred creditor status that is similar to the IMF, while accepting preferred creditor status of the IMF over the ESM. This does not apply to ESM loans for programmes that existed when the ESM Treaty was signed. Moreover, for the financial assistance to Spain it was decided to not apply the preferred creditor status. The ESM has implemented an early warning procedure as requested by the ESM Treaty to monitor the ability of the beneficiary Member State to repay its obligations. Findings are summarised in a regular report analysed by the Internal Risk Committee.
The ESM provided financial assistance to Spain for the recapitalisation of its financial sector which must be repaid by 2027. The ESM also provided financial assistance to Cyprus, which implemented a macroeconomic adjustment programme. Furthermore, starting from August 2015, the ESM provided financial assistance to
Greece. Note 6 provides a breakdown of all disbursed amounts, as well as the movements during the year.
From an investor’s point of view, the ESM’s capital structure and the possibility of capital calls mitigate the risk arising from beneficiary Member States’ non-payment and potential losses from other risks. Under Article 9 of
the ESM Treaty, there are different instances when a capital call can be made to cover losses or avert non-payment, as described in Note 15. These mechanisms provide the strongest possible assurance that ESM debt securities will be serviced and repaid.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 9 7
3.3. Market risk
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from changes in the value of financial assets and liabilities due to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and other factors affecting the price of securities / financial instruments (e.g. credit spreads and basis risk).
3.3.1. Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is defined as the potential for loss arising from adverse movements in interest rates. The main sources of interest rate risk include asset or liability re-pricing following market movements, yield curve shifts, and changes in interest rate credit spread.
Structural interest rate risk is defined as the risk of a mismatch between the interest rate re-pricing of loans granted to beneficiary Member States and of its funding raised through bills and bond issuances. The exposure to interest rate risk arises from differences in repricing and maturity characteristics of the different asset, liability, and hedging instruments.
All funding costs arising from refinancing risk are passed through to beneficiary Member States under financial assistance, as defined by the ESM Pricing Policy.
Non-structural interest rate risk is the risk of loss due to an adverse change in the overall level of interest rates affecting the value of the investment portfolio. Non-structural interest rate risk is monitored and controlled on a daily basis through risk indicators and stress tests. Duration bands, cumulated and partial sensitivities, 1 day Value at Risk with a 99% level of confidence are part of the daily measures that frame the interest rate risk potential exposure. To complement these measures, a series of stress tests with flattening, steepening and parallel shifts of all or a selected number of interest rate curves is daily processed as part of the risk report.
In addition, Capital volatility and Capital preservation measures frame and limit the Short Term and the Medium/
Long Term tranches interest rate risk exposures in line with the Risk Appetite of the Institution as described and published in the ESM Investment Guidelines.
Capital volatility is defined as a yearly limit to market losses over a one-year horizon for the Medium/Long Term
Tranche. The 1 year VaR 99% should be lower than 3% of the market value of the tranche.
Capital preservation is defined as protecting shareholders from losses on the Paid-in-Capital, which currently
stands at €80.5 billion. The market value of the STT (including the Reserve Fund) and MLTT investment portfo 04
lios shall not fall below this value over a relevant investment horizon, for a high level of confidence. The relevant investment horizon is set in relation to the nature of each portfolio:
ƒ For the Short-Term Tranche, the capital shall be preserved at a one-year horizon, for a high level of confidence.
ƒ For the Medium/Long-Term Tranche, the capital shall be preserved at a three-year horizon for a high level of confidence.
To assess capital preservation with a ‘high level of confidence’, a vast array of scenarios of interest rate movements are used to forecast the market value of the STT and the MLTT investments over the relevant investment horizons.
Scenario analyses are different to sensitivity analysis as they assess the impact of a range of different setups and correlations over a multi-year period, while sensitivity analysis assesses the linear and instantaneous impact to a given change in interest rates.
These scenarios, developed in cooperation with Investment and Treasury, are agreed at the Internal Risk Committee (IRC) and endorsed by the Board Risk Committee (BRC).
Capital preservation scenario analysis results are reported at least once a year to IRC/BRC and for any major investment portfolio strategy proposal to the IMC.
9 8 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Derivatives contracted with commercial banks are fully collateralised, thanks to the exchange of cash and highly rated securities, regulated by collateral agreements (ISDA and Credit Support Annex – CSA - standards).
The interest rate risk on the ESM investment portfolio is managed prudently to support the ESM’s financial stability mandate, which requires the ESM to maintain financial soundness including in period of market stress.
3.3.2. Currency risk
Currency risk is defined as the potential for loss arising from changes in exchange rates and shall be minimised by limiting net currency exposure, in line with the risk appetite of the institution.
The ESM is exposed to currency risk whenever there is a currency mismatch between its assets and liabilities. The potential source of currency risk is the non-euro investments made in the investment portfolios and funding
activities.
In 2018, the ESM had investment activities in foreign currency assets, mainly Swedish krona, Japanese yen and US dollars. In compliance with the Article 2 (5) of the ESM Investment Guidelines, any currency risk is hedged into
euros to ensure a limited remaining foreign exchange risk for the ESM (refer to Note 3.6).
The ESM also has funding activities in US dollars. In 2017, the ESM decided to broaden its investor base and
spread its funding liquidity risk across the euro and dollar markets. On 24 October 2017, the ESM priced its inaugural
US dollar issue, raising $3 billion. On 16 October 2018, the ESM raised $3 billion by issuing a new 2-year
bond, its second deal in the dollar market. The ESM does not run currency risk through these transactions, as it
has hedged the proceeds back into euros (refer to Note 3.6.1.2).
As it is the case for Interest Rate Swaps, operations contracted with commercial banks are fully collateralised, thanks to the exchange of cash and highly rated securities, regulated by collateral agreements (ISDA and Credit
Support Annex – CSA – standards).
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 9 9
31 December 2018 Japanese US Dollar Swedish Other
(in €‘000) Euro (EUR) Yen (JPY) (USD) Krone (SEK) currencies Total
ASSETS
Cash in hand, balances with central
banks and post office banks 65,245,717 - - - - 65,245,717
Loans and advances to
credit institutions 1,291,715 - - - - 1,291,715
Loans and advances to euro
area Member States 89,894,688 - - - - 89,894,688
Debt securities including
fixed-income securities 18,765,766 4,968,264 1,366,833 183,994 298,073 25,582,930
Prepayments and accrued income 722,022 5,624 49,288 995 - 777,929
Total financial assets 175,919,908 4,973,888 1,416,121 184,989 298,073 182,792,979
LIABILITIES
Amounts owed to credit institutions 277,202 - - - - 277,202
Debt securities in issue 93,168,174 - 5,225,785 - - 98,393,959
Other liabilities 9,503 - - - - 9,503
Accruals and deferred income 970,757 113,256 60,095 3,515 - 1,147,623
Total financial liabilities 94,425,636 113,256 5,285,880 3,515 - 99,828,287
Shareholders’ equity (1) 82,971,935 - - - - -
Total shareholders’ equity (2) 82,971,935 - - - - 82,971,935
Off-balance sheet derivatives 1,372,710 (4,843,353) 3,871,878 (180,403) - 220,832
Net of financial position (104,953) 17,279 2,119 1,071 298,073 213,589
-
(1)Excluding subscribed capital unpaid and subscribed capital called but not paid
-
(2)Shareholder equity has no defined maturity
04
1 0 0 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
31 December 2017 Japanese US Dollar Swedish Other (in €‘000) Euro (EUR) Yen (JPY) (USD) Krone (SEK) currencies Total ASSETS Cash in hand, balances with central
banks and post office banks 74,288,120 - - - - 74,288,120
Loans and advances to credit
institutions 369,174 - - - - 369,174
Loans and advances to euro area
Member States 76,194,688 - - - - 76,194,688
Debt securities including fixedincome
securities 15,981,269 4,536,847 181,947 190,621 - 20,890,684
Prepayments and accrued income 801,314 7,921 10,562 1,036 - 820,833
Total financial assets 167,634,565 4,544,768 192,509 191,657 - 172,563,499
LIABILITIES Amounts owed to credit institutions 32,600 - - - - 32,600 Debt securities in issue 86,711,327 - 2,489,756 - - 89,201,083 Other liabilities 8,488 - - - - 8,488 Accruals and deferred income 677,335 82,069 25,180 4,992 - 789,576
Total financial liabilities 87,429,750 82,069 2,514,936 4,992 - 90,031,747
Shareholders’ equity (1) 82,536,452 - - - - 82,536,452 Total shareholders’ equity (2) 82,536,452 - - - - 82,536,452
Off-balance sheet derivatives 2,639,552 (4,454,205) 2,317,018 (187,936) - 314,429
Net of financial position 307,915 8,494 (5,409) (1,271) - 309,729
-
(1)Excluding subscribed capital unpaid and subscribed capital called but not paid (2) Shareholder equity has no defined maturity.
3.4. Liquidity risk
The ESM will honour its obligations under its issued debt securities from proceeds that stem from its support programmes, supported by its subscribed capital. The ESM monitors its liquidity position on a daily basis by
assessing its funding liquidity risk and market liquidity risk.
Funding liquidity risk is defined as the risk of loss arising from difficulty in securing the necessary funding, or from a significantly higher cost of funding than normal levels, due to a deterioration of the ESM’s creditworthiness, or at a time of unfavourable market conditions (such as periods of high stress). Funding liquidity risk is managed by maintaining a permanent market access to a wide investor base with different funding instruments, multiple
credit lines and investing capital in high-credit-quality liquid assets that can be used to raise cash to meet obligations as they fall due. The market presence in the USD market which started in 2017 reduces further the funding liquidity risk as it gives access to additional investors in a different market. At the end of December 2018, the ESM’s liquidity buffer stood at €8.4 billion (2017: €13.1 billion).
Market liquidity risk is defined as the potential for loss arising from a position that cannot easily be liquidated without significantly and negatively influencing its market price. Market liquidity risk is minimised by investing in high credit quality liquid assets, ensuring the ESM does not hold a significant portion of a security issuance and
adopting adequate measurements that allow the timely detection of liquidity deteriorations.
The tables below analyse the ESM’s financial assets and liabilities and the shareholders’ equity by maturity on the basis of the period remaining between the balance sheet date and the contractual maturity date.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 0 1
31 December 2018 Less than From 3 months From 1 to More than
(in €‘000) 3 months to 1 year 5 years 5 years Total
ASSETS
Cash in hand, balances with central
banks and post office banks 65,245,717 - - - 65,245,717
Loans and advances to credit
institutions 1,291,715 - - - 1,291,715
Loans and advances to euro area
Member States - - - 89,894,688 89,894,688
Debt securities including fixed-income
securities 433,795 834,702 15,611,898 8,702,535 25,582,930
Prepayments and accrued income 95,838 567,510 - 114,581 777,929
Total financial assets 67,067,065 1,402,212 15,611,898 98,711,804 182,792,979
LIABILITIES
Amounts owed to credit institutions 277,202 - - - 277,202
Debt securities in issue 11,897,405 9,012,566 32,216,672 45,267,316 98,393,959
Other liabilities 9,503 - - - 9,503
Accruals and deferred income 325,499 445,425 158,941 217,758 1,147,623
Total financial liabilities 12,509,609 9,457,991 32,375,613 45,485,074 99,828,287
Shareholders’ equity (1) - - - 82,971,935 82,971,935
Total shareholders’ equity (2) - - - 82,971,935 82,971,935
Net of financial position 54,557,456 (8,055,779) (16,763,715) (29,745,205) (7,243)
31 December 2017 Less than From 3 months From 1 to More than
(in €‘000) 3 months to 1 year 5 years 5 years Total
ASSETS
Cash in hand, balances with central
banks and post office banks 74,288,120 - - - 74,288,120
Loans and advances to credit
institutions 369,174 - - - 369,174
Loans and advances to euro area 04
Member States - - - 76,194,688 76,194,688
Debt securities including fixed-income
securities 64,902 1,542,344 16,039,694 3,243,744 20,890,684
Prepayments and accrued income 77,758 592,843 42,048 108,184 820,833
Total financial assets 74,799,954 2,135,187 16,081,742 79,546,616 172,563,499
LIABILITIES
Amounts owed to credit institutions 32,600 - - - 32,600
Debt securities in issue 8,982,989 15,917,806 26,510,038 37,790,250 89,201,083
Other liabilities 8,488 - - - 8,488
Accruals and deferred income 256,026 319,934 149,157 64,459 789,576
Total financial liabilities 9,280,103 16,237,740 26,659,195 37,854,709 90,031,747
Shareholders’ equity (1) - - - 82,536,452 82,536,452
Total shareholders’ equity (2) - - - 82,536,452 82,536,452
Net of financial position 65,519,851 (14,102,553) (10,577,453) (40,844,545) (4,700)
-
(1)Excluding subscribed capital unpaid and subscribed capital called but not paid
-
(2)The shareholder’s equity has no defined maturity
1 0 2 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
3.5. Operational risk
Operational risk is defined as the potential loss or damage, and/or the inability of the ESM to fulfil its mandate, resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems or from external events. The categorisation of the ESM operational risks is based on guidance from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, as follows:
ƒ execution, delivery, and process management;
ƒ counterparts, products, and business practices;
ƒ fraud;
ƒ business continuity and systems failures;
ƒ employment practices and workplace safety; and
ƒ damage to physical assets.
Management has no tolerance for material operational risks, including those originating from third party/vendor engagements, which may result in the ESM’s inability to effectively fulfil its mandate, or in significant loss and/or
reputational damage. No material operational risk losses were identified in 2018.
All departments are responsible for the proactive mitigation of operational risks, and for the robustness of the
controls in their processes. If operational risk events occur, they are reported to the Risk & Compliance Department
through an internal operational risk register. Formal escalation procedures have been established involving
the Internal Risk Committee and the Board Risk Committee to ensure the active involvement of senior management
and, where necessary, the Board of Directors.
All departments, with support from the Operational Risk function, perform a root-cause analysis of operational risk events and implement improvements, as necessary, in the underlying processes and controls to reduce the probability of reoccurrence. This approach is complemented by annual risk control self-assessments for each department, and bi-annual business continuity risk assessment, to identify and assess the ESM’s top operational risks (based on potential likelihood and impact). The Risk & Compliance Department monitors these risks and
reports on them to the Internal Risk Committee and to the Board Risk Committee.
3.6. Derivatives
The ESM uses derivative instruments as described in Note 2.5 for risk management purposes only and this as
part of its investment and funding activities. In 2015, the ESM entered into foreign exchange derivative transactions
such as foreign exchange swaps and forward contracts to cash flow hedge the currency risk related to
short-term non-euro denominated investments. Since 2017, the ESM also entered into interest rate swaps to
manage globally the Investment portfolio’s interest rate exposure and to decrease the interest rate volatility on
the Greek debt. Longer term cross-currency asset swaps were contracted as well to cash flow hedge longer term
non-euro denominated investments and to hedge in euro the issuances in USD.
On 31 December 2018, the derivative instruments had a maximum maturity up to 30 years (2017: maximum maturity up to 30 years) and were concluded with euro area central banks, international financial institutions and
commercial banks.
3.6.1. Funding derivatives
The derivatives used in the context of funding are:
ƒ Interest rate swaps;
ƒ Cross-currency asset swaps.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 0 3
3.6.1.1. Interest rate swaps
Interest rate swaps exchange future interest payments, usually a fixed interest rate for a floating rate, or vice versa, to reduce or increase exposure to fluctuations in interest rates based on a specified notional amount.
On 20 January 2017, the ESM Board of Directors approved three schemes aimed at reducing interest rate risk for
Greece. Amongst others, it allowed the ESM to enter into interest rate swap arrangements that aimed to stabilise the ESM’s overall cost of funding for Greece, i.e. to reduce the risk that Greece would have to pay a higher interest rate on its loans when market rates start rising.
The following table shows the interest rate swaps according to their notional amount and fair value. The notional amounts are disclosed off balance sheet.
Interest rate swaps (in €’000) 31.12.2018 31.12.2017 Notional amount (receivable) 60,000,000 36,311,000 Positive fair value (i.e. net discounted value) 284,496 69,074 Negative fair value (i.e. net discounted value) (1,139,657) (254,001)
3.6.1.2. Cross-currency asset swaps
Cross-currency asset swaps are derivative contracts under which it is agreed by two counterparties to exchange interest payments (fixed-fixed, fixed-float and float-float) and principal denominated in two different currencies. In a cross-currency asset swap, interest payments and principal in one currency are exchanged for equally valued principal and interest payments in a different currency. Interest payments are exchanged at fixed intervals during the life of the contract. Starting in 2017 and continuing in 2018, the ESM broadened its investor base and spread its funding liquidity risk across the euro and dollar markets (refer to Note 3.3.2). The ESM hedges the currency risk of these transactions in US dollars using cross-currency asset swaps contracts.
The following table shows the cross-currency swaps according to their notional amount and fair value. The notional amounts are disclosed off balance sheet.
Cross-currency assets swaps (in €’000) 31.12.2018 31.12.2017 Notional amount (receivable) 5,240,175 2,501,459 Positive fair value (i.e. net discounted value) 88,315 -
Negative fair value (i.e. net discounted value) - (69,361) 04
3.6.2. Investment derivatives
The derivatives used in the context of investment activity are:
ƒ Interest rate swaps;
ƒ Cross-currency asset swaps;
ƒ Foreign exchange (FX) swaps and forwards.
1 0 4 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
3.6.2.1. Interest rate swaps
Interest rate swaps exchange future interest payments, usually a fixed interest rate for a floating rate, or vice versa, to reduce or increase exposure to fluctuations in interest rates based on a specified notional amount.
Starting in 2017, the ESM has used interest rate swaps to manage the interest rate risk of the paid-in capital
portfolio.
The following table shows the interest rate swaps according to their notional amount and fair value. The notional amounts are disclosed off balance sheet.
Interest rate swaps (in €’000) 31.12.2018 31.12.2017 Notional amount (receivable) 2,372,500 201,000 Positive fair value (i.e. net discounted value) 4,056 263 Negative fair value (i.e. net discounted value) (33,685) (189)
3.6.2.2. Foreign exchange (FX) swaps and forwards
In a foreign exchange swap, two parties agree to exchange the principal amounts of two different currencies at the beginning of the transaction and the amounts to exchange at maturity. A foreign exchange forward is essentially a hedging tool that involves the purchase or sale of a currency on a future date at a predetermined exchange rate without any upfront payment.
Starting from 2015, the ESM has invested limited amounts in short-term (with a maximum maturity of 2 years) assets denominated in a foreign currency.
The following tables shows the foreign exchange swaps and forwards according to their notional amount and
fair value. The notional amounts are disclosed off balance sheet.
Foreign exchange swaps (in €’000) 31.12.2018 31.12.2017 Notional amount (receivable) 484,896 2,305,628 Positive fair value (i.e. net discounted value) 8,039 262,957 Negative fair value (i.e. net discounted value) - (2,354)
Foreign exchange forwards (in €’000) 31.12.2018 31.12.2017 Notional amount (receivable) - 1,363 Positive fair value (i.e. net discounted value) - 151
3.6.2.3. Cross-currency asset swaps
Cross-currency asset swaps are derivatives contracts under which it is agreed by two counterparties to exchange interest payments (fixed-fixed, fixed-float and float-float) and principal denominated in two different currencies. In a cross-currency asset swap, interest payments and principal in one currency are exchanged for equally valued principal and interest payments in a different currency. Interest payments are exchanged at fixed intervals during
the life of the contract.
Starting in 2017, the ESM has invested in non-euro denominated securities with longer maturities.
The following table shows the cross currency-asset swaps according to their notional amount and fair value. The notional amounts are disclosed off balance sheet.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 0 5
Cross-currency asset swaps (in €’000) 31.12.2018 31.12.2017 Notional amount (receivable) 6,027,103 3,286,802 Positive fair value (i.e. net discounted value) 8,942 54,231 Negative fair value (i.e. net discounted value) (326,163) (18,278)
3.6.3. Credit risk on derivatives
Credit risk exposure for derivatives lies in the loss that the ESM would incur if a counterparty were unable to honour its contractual obligations. There are three main forms of credit risk related to derivatives. First, for cross-currency asset swaps and FX swaps, the exchange of notional at beginning and maturity of a trade can lead to settlement risk. Second, the default of a derivative counterparty over the life of the derivative can lead to a loss, if changes in the mark-to-market (MtM) value of the position are not fully collateralised at the time of default. Third, when using derivatives, the ESM is exposed to replacement risk. This is the loss the ESM would face if it would have to replace a trade from a defaulted counterparty with a new counterparty.
With regard to derivative transactions, the ESM has contracted FX and interest rate derivative transactions since
2015. Operations contracted with commercial banks are fully collateralised, thanks to the exchange of cash and highly rated securities. The exposure after collateral posting is then limited to the intraday market movements and their impact on the market value of the exposure and on the posted collateral value.
The ESM put in place a series of procedures to safeguard against losses arising from the use of such instruments.
ƒ Contractual framework
All of the ESM’s derivatives transactions are governed by best practice International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) agreements. In addition, for all commercial counterparties, the ESM has put in place Credit Support Annexes (CSAs) for over-the-counter transactions, which specify the conditions of exposure collateralisation on a daily basis.
ƒ Counterparty selection
The minimum rating of a counterparty at the outset of a trade is at least BBB+/Baa1. The ESM has the right of early termination if the rating of the counterparty drops below a certain level. The ESM sets derivative limits per counterparty, based on forecasted exposure at default. The ESM uses the Basel Committee’s recommended
standardised approach for measuring counterparty credit risk exposures to quantify exposure at default per 04
counterparty. The methodology also considers potential losses that could occur in between the default and the replacement of the cancelled trade.
ƒ Collateralisation
Exposures towards commercial banks (exceeding limited thresholds) are fully collateralized by cash and/or securities. On a daily basis, the ESM monitors and values its derivative positions, and calls or releases collateral, as applicable. Below a certain counterparty credit rating, the ESM receives an additional independent amount from counterparties, in line with recommendations of the Basel Committee.
ƒ Settlement limits
The ESM limits settlement risk for bilateral FX swaps and cross-currency asset swaps through settlement limits for counterparties, based on these counterparties’ creditworthiness. Settlement risk is measured and monitored on a daily basis.
In the context of the United Kingdom leaving the EU, the ESM has reviewed any exposures that it has towards counterparties based in the United Kingdom and has taken preventive measures, as applicable, to mitigate the impact on the ESM’s business operations.
1 0 6 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
4. Cash in hand, balances with central banks and post office banks
The composition of cash in hand, balances with central banks and post office banks is as follows:
(in €’000) 31.12.2018 31.12.2017 Current account balances with euro area central banks (1) 65,243,078 74,285,731 Current account balances with other banks (2) 2,639 2,389 Total cash in hand, balances with central banks and post office banks 65,245,717 74,288,120
-
(1)In 2017, the ESM opened two new current accounts at the European Central Bank. (2) The ESM holds current accounts for operational purposes with a state-owned bank as well as clearing accounts with custodians. No current account is held with post office banks.
The cash balance with euro area central banks is comprised of paid-in capital, the reserve fund and the liquidity buffer investment.
5. Loans and advances to credit institutions
The following table shows the breakdown of the other loans and advances to credit institutions:
(in €’000) 31.12.2018 31.12.2017 Money market deposits with other banks - 100,000 Cash collateral provided 1,026,650 267,660 Reverse repos 263,462 - Other deposits 1,603 1,514 Total loans and advances to credit institutions 1,291,715 369,174
Other deposits consist entirely of the lease guarantee deposit in relation to the ESM rental agreement. The cash collateral provided for, relates entirely to derivatives transactions. The reverse repurchase agreements (`reverse
repo`) are transactions traded on regulated markets.
6. Loans and advances to euro area Member States
In accordance with Article 9 of the ESM Treaty, the Board of Governors may decide to grant financial assistance in the form of a loan to an ESM Member (refer to Note 27).
The following table shows the geographical breakdown of loans per financial assistance programme and by borrowing country:
No. of Clean carrying value as at (in €’000) loans Nominal amount 31 December 2018 Loans to euro area Member States
-
-to Spain 5 23,721,460 23,721,460 - to Cyprus 9 6,300,000 6,300,000 - to Greece 11 59,873,228 59,873,228 Total 25 89,894,688 89,894,688
No. of Clean carrying value as at (in €’000) loans Nominal amount 31 December 2017 Loans to euro area Member States
-
-to Spain 5 31,721,460 31,721,460 - to Cyprus 9 6,300,000 6,300,000 - to Greece 8 38,173,228 38,173,228 Total 22 76,194,688 76,194,688
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 0 7
The following table shows the movements of the loans to euro area Member States during 2017 and 2018:
(in €’000) 1 January 2017 balance 72,732,950 New disbursements 8,500,000 - to Greece 8,500,000 Early repayments (5,029,200) - from Spain (3,000,000) - from Greece (2,029,200) Premiums/discounts amortization (9,062) 31 December 2017 balance 76,194,688
(in €’000) 1 January 2018 balance 76,194,688 New disbursements 21,700,000 - to Greece 21,700,000 Early repayments (8,000,000) - from Spain (8,000,000) Premiums/discounts amortization - 31 December 2018 balance 89,894,688
7. Debt securities including fixed-income securities
The following table shows the details of the paid-in-capital portfolio debt securities valuation:
Clean fair (in €’000) Clean amortised cost Unrealised gains (carrying) value Nominal amount 31.12.2018 25,442,756 140,174 25,582,930 25,155,501 31.12.2017 20,791,565 99,119 20,890,684 20,402,049
On 31 December 2018, the clean amortised cost of the debt securities was €25.4 billion (31 December 2017: €20.8 billion), against a clean fair value of €25.6 billion (31 December 2017: €20.9 billion). The difference represents the unrealised result and is recognised directly in the equity within the fair value reserve.
In respect of the paid-in capital portfolio invested in debt securities, the ESM has an established investment policy setting strict eligibility criteria that restrict investment to issuers with the highest credit quality. The Risk & Compliance
Department defines a limit structure to mitigate the maximum exposure per issuer. 04
On 31 December 2018, the debt securities including fixed income securities of the paid-in capital portfolio include investments in money market securities that are not listed on regulated markets with a total clean fair value of €89.2 million (nil as of 31 December 2017). Their fair values are determined using valuation techniques, as disclosed in Note 2.7.3. All other securities are listed on regulated markets and the fair values of these assets are based on quoted market prices.
The ESM invests in debt securities issued by public bodies and other issuers. Public bodies cover central banks, central governments, regional governments, local governments, supranational institutions and governmental agencies. On 31 December 2018, debt securities issued by public bodies amounted to €8.3 billion. (31 December 2017: €11.0 billion), while debt securities issued by other borrowers amounted to €17.3 billion (31 December 2017: €9.9 billion).
Starting from 2015, the ESM has invested part of the paid-in capital portfolio in short-term assets denominated in a foreign currency (refer to Note 3.3.2). Starting in 2017, the ESM has invested in non-euro denominated securities with longer maturities.
1 0 8 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
8. Intangible assets
The following table shows the movements of intangible assets during 2018:
(in €’000) Software Total intangible assets Historical cost 1 January 2018 balance 168 168 Additions 27 27 31 December 2018 balance 195 195
Accumulated amortisation 1 January 2018 balance (132) (132) Amortisation (27) (27) 31 December 2018 balance (159) (159)
Net book value 31 December 2018 balance 36 36 31 December 2017 balance 36 36
9. Tangible assets
The following table shows the movements of tangible assets during 2018:
(in €’000) Fixtures and fittings Furniture and office equipment Total tangible assets
Historical cost
1 January 2018 balance 6,628 1,960 8,588
Additions 3,159 615 3,774
Disposals - - -
31 December 2018 balance 9,787 2,575 12,362
Accumulated depreciation 1 January 2018 balance (2,312) (1,612) (3,924) Depreciation (994) (237) (1,231) Of the disposed assets - - - 31 December 2018 balance (3,306) (1,849) (5,155)
Net book value 31 December 2018 balance 6,481 726 7,207 31 December 2017 balance 4,316 348 4,664
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 0 9
10. Prepayments and accrued income
The following table shows the breakdown of prepayments and accrued income. The receivables are due within a year:
(in €’000) 31.12.2018 31.12.2017 Interest receivable on: - Debt securities including fixed-income securities 78,620 78,988 - Loans and advances to euro area Member States 431,006 283,441 - Loans and advances to credit institutions 92 8 Amounts charged to the EFSF for administrative services (Note 20/27) 9,789 10,025 Commitment fee receivable 75 10,845 Prepayments 115,372 845 Amounts from sanctions to Member States (1) 26,820 18,930 Other (2) 116,155 417,751 Total prepayments and accrued income 777,929 820,833
-
(1)The ESM received the payments of certain sanctions paid by its Member States (refer to Note 24). (2) “Other” represents the spot revaluation, spread amortisation and accrued income of ongoing derivative transactions (refer to Note 2.11).
11. Amounts owed to credit institutions
On 31 December 2018, the €277.2 million of amounts owed to credit institutions were composed of cash collateral received for the derivatives €14.2 million (31 December 2017: €32.6 million) and repurchase agreement (“repo”) €263 million (31 December 2017: €nil).
04
1 1 0 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
12. Debts evidenced by certificates
The following table discloses the details of debt securities in issue outstanding on 31 December 2018, together
with the coupon rates and due dates..
Nominal Type of funding/ amount Programmes ISIN code (in €’000) Issue date Maturity date Coupon Long-term Funding EU000A1U9803 3,000,000 20/11/2013 20/11/2023 2.125% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9803 (2) 990,750 27/06/2014 20/11/2023 2.125% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9811 6,000,000 04/03/2014 04/03/2021 1.375% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9829 3,000,000 14/05/2014 15/10/2019 0.875% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9829 (2) 2,000,000 28/07/2015 15/10/2019 0.875% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9894 3,000,000 23/09/2015 23/09/2025 1.000% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9894 (2) 999,850 29/09/2016 23/09/2025 1.000% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9902 3,000,000 20/10/2015 20/10/2045 1.750% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9910 4,000,000 03/11/2015 03/11/2020 0.100% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9910 (2) 992,750 11/03/2016 03/11/2020 0.100% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9928 1,500,000 17/11/2015 17/11/2036 1.625% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9928 (2) 1,000,000 31/03/2016 17/11/2036 1.625% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9936 1,000,000 01/12/2015 01/12/2055 1.850% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9936 (2) 1,000,000 01/03/2016 01/12/2055 1.850% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9944 3,000,000 02/03/2016 02/03/2026 0.500% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9944 (2) 2,500,000 19/07/2016 02/03/2026 0.500% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9951 3,000,000 22/04/2016 22/04/2024 0.125% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9951 (2) 961,100 28/07/2016 22/04/2024 0.125% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9951 (2) 989,750 11/11/2016 22/04/2024 0.125% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9969 3,000,000 03/05/2016 03/05/2032 1.125% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9969 (2) 1,000,000 18/10/2016 03/05/2032 1.125% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9977 2,500,000 19/07/2016 18/07/2042 0.875% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0001 (3) 80,000 22/01/2016 22/01/2041 1.572% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0002 (3) 30,000 10/02/2016 11/02/2041 1.360% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0003 (3) 25,000 09/03/2016 09/03/2056 1.559% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0004 (3) 25,000 09/03/2016 09/03/2056 1.559% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0005 (3) 25,000 31/03/2016 22/03/2046 1.316% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0006 (3) 30,000 11/04/2016 11/04/2046 1.220% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0007 (3) 40,000 03/08/2016 03/08/2056 1.156% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0008 (3) 150,000 09/08/2016 09/08/2056 1.150% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0009 (3) 50,000 19/08/2016 19/08/2053 1.025% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0010 (3) 50,000 19/08/2016 18/08/2056 1.064% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0011 (3) 50,000 19/09/2016 19/09/2051 1.030% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9985 3,000,000 18/10/2016 18/10/2022 0.000% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9985 (2) 996,500 16/11/2017 18/10/2022 0.000% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0012 (3) 50,000 19/10/2016 19/10/2054 1.145% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0013 (3) 40,000 19/10/2016 19/10/2056 1.125% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0014 (3) 25,000 27/10/2016 27/10/2056 1.086% Long-term Funding EU000A1Z99A1 3,500,000 01/02/2017 02/11/2046 1.800% Long-term Funding EU000A1Z99A1 (2) 1,500,000 14/06/2017 02/11/2046 1.800%
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 1 1
Continued from the previous page
Nominal Type of funding/ amount Programmes ISIN code (in €’000) Issue date Maturity date Coupon Long-term Funding EU000A1Z99B9 3,000,000 14/03/2017 15/03/2027 0.750% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0015 (3) 110,000 14/03/2017 14/03/2047 1.800% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0016 (3) 40,000 31/03/2017 30/03/2057 1.850% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0017 (3) 100,000 21/04/2017 21/04/2047 1.573% Long-term Funding XS1704649158 (4) 2,620,087 31/10/2017 03/11/2022 2.125% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0018 (3) 60,000 27/11/2017 27/11/2057 1.591% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0019 (3) 25,000 11/12/2017 11/12/2057 1.530% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0020 (3) 50,000 12/12/2017 12/12/2057 1.505% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0021 (3) 50,000 19/12/2017 19/12/2057 1.442% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9985 (2) 998,550 23/02/2018 18/10/2022 0.000% Long-term Funding EU000A1Z99D5 2,000,000 23/05/2018 23/05/2033 1.200% Long-term Funding EU000A1Z99B9 (2) 1,500,000 19/06/2018 15/03/2027 0.750% Long-term Funding EU000A1Z99E3 4,000,000 31/07/2018 31/07/2023 0.100% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9936 750,000 05/09/2018 01/12/2055 1.850% Long-term Funding EU000A1Z99F0 3,250,000 05/09/2018 05/09/2028 0.750% Long-term Funding EU000A1Z99G8 3,000,000 16/10/2018 17/01/2022 0.000% Long-term Funding XS1896646137 (4) 2,620,087 23/10/2018 23/10/2020 3.000% Short-term Funding EU000A1Z98Y3 (1) 1,922,350 19/07/2018 24/01/2019 N/A Short-term Funding EU000A1Z9808 (1) 1,999,250 23/08/2018 21/02/2019 N/A Short-term Funding EU000A1Z9824 (1) 1,970,200 20/09/2018 21/03/2019 N/A Short-term Funding EU000A1Z9832 (1) 1,999,750 04/10/2018 10/01/2019 N/A Short-term Funding EU000A1Z9840 (1) 1,998,400 18/10/2018 18/04/2019 N/A Short-term Funding EU000A1Z9857 (1) 1,998,300 08/11/2018 07/02/2019 N/A Short-term Funding EU000A1Z9865 (1) 1,998,900 22/11/2018 23/05/2019 N/A Short-term Funding EU000A1Z9873 (1) 1,999,500 06/12/2018 07/03/2019 N/A Total 98,161,074
-
(1)Zero-coupon bond (2) Tap issue (3) N-bond with technical ISIN: the ESM issued its first N-bond (Namensschuldverschreibungen) in 2016. N-Bonds are privately placed, long-term funding instruments that are neither centrally cleared nor listed. (4) USD denominated debt securities issued starting with 2017.
04
1 1 2 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
The following table discloses the details of debt securities in issue outstanding on 31 December 2017, together
with the coupon rates and due dates..
Type of funding/ Nominal amount Programmes ISIN code (in €’000) Issue date Maturity date Coupon Long-term Funding EU000A1U9803 3,000,000 11/20/2013 11/20/2023 2.125% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9803 (2) 990,750 6/27/2014 11/20/2023 2.125% Long-term Funding EU000A1U98Z1 7,000,000 10/15/2013 10/15/2018 1.250% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9811 6,000,000 3/4/2014 3/4/2021 1.375%
Long-term Funding EU000A1U9829 3,000,000 5/14/2014 10/15/2019 0.875% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9829 (2) 2,000,000 7/28/2015 10/15/2019 0.875% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9886 6,000,000 9/15/2015 12/17/2018 0.050% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9894 3,000,000 9/23/2015 9/23/2025 1.000%
Long-term Funding EU000A1U9894 (2) 999,850 9/29/2016 9/23/2025 1.000% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9902 3,000,000 10/20/2015 10/20/2045 1.750% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9910 4,000,000 11/3/2015 11/3/2020 0.100% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9910 (2) 992,750 3/11/2016 11/3/2020 0.100%
Long-term Funding EU000A1U9928 1,500,000 11/17/2015 11/17/2036 1.625% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9928 (2) 1,000,000 3/31/2016 11/17/2036 1.625% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9936 1,000,000 12/1/2015 12/1/2055 1.850% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9936 (2) 1,000,000 3/1/2016 12/1/2055 1.850%
Long-term Funding EU000A1U9944 3,000,000 3/2/2016 3/2/2026 0.500% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9944 (2) 2,500,000 7/19/2016 3/2/2026 0.500% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9951 3,000,000 4/22/2016 4/22/2024 0.125% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9951 (2) 961,100 7/28/2016 4/22/2024 0.125%
Long-term Funding EU000A1U9951 (2) 989,750 11/11/2016 4/22/2024 0.125% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9969 3,000,000 5/3/2016 5/3/2032 1.125% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9969 (2) 1,000,000 10/18/2016 5/3/2032 1.125% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9977 2,500,000 7/19/2016 7/18/2042 0.875%
Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0001 (3) 80,000 1/22/2016 1/22/2041 1.572% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0002 (3) 30,000 2/10/2016 2/11/2041 1.360% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0003 (3) 25,000 3/9/2016 3/9/2056 1.559% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0004 (3) 25,000 3/9/2016 3/9/2056 1.559%
Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0005 (3) 25,000 3/31/2016 3/22/2046 1.316% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0006 (3) 30,000 4/11/2016 4/11/2046 1.220% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0007 (3) 40,000 8/3/2016 8/3/2056 1.156% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0008 (3) 150,000 8/9/2016 8/9/2056 1.150%
Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0009 (3) 50,000 8/19/2016 8/19/2053 1.025% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0010 (3) 50,000 8/19/2016 8/18/2056 1.064% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0011 (3) 50,000 9/19/2016 9/19/2051 1.030% Long-term Funding EU000A1U9985 3,000,000 10/18/2016 10/18/2022 0.000%
Long-term Funding EU000A1U9985 (2) 996,500 11/16/2017 10/18/2022 0.000% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0012 (3) 50,000 10/19/2016 10/19/2054 1.145% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0013 (3) 40,000 10/19/2016 10/19/2056 1.125% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0014 (3) 25,000 10/27/2016 10/27/2056 1.086%
Long-term Funding EU000A1Z99A1 3,500,000 2/1/2017 11/2/2046 1.800% Long-term Funding EU000A1Z99A1 (2) 1,500,000 6/14/2017 11/2/2046 1.800% Long-term Funding EU000A1Z99B9 3,000,000 3/14/2017 3/15/2027 0.750%
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 1 3
Continued from the previous page
Type of funding/ Nominal amount Programmes ISIN code (in €’000) Issue date Maturity date Coupon Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0015 (3) 110,000 3/14/2017 3/14/2047 1.800% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0016 (3) 40,000 3/31/2017 3/30/2057 1.850% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0017 (3) 100,000 4/21/2017 4/21/2047 1.573% Long-term Funding XS1704649158 (4) 2,501,459 10/31/2017 11/3/2022 2.125%
Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0018 (3) 60,000 11/27/2017 11/27/2057 1.591% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0019 (3) 25,000 12/11/2017 12/11/2057 1.530% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0020 (3) 50,000 12/12/2017 12/12/2057 1.505% Long-term Funding ESMNBOND0021 (3) 50,000 12/19/2017 12/19/2057 1.442%
Short-term Funding EU000A1Z9790 (1) 1,500,000 7/20/2017 1/25/2018 N/A Short-term Funding EU000A1Z98B1 (1) 1,484,400 8/24/2017 2/22/2018 N/A Short-term Funding EU000A1Z98D7 (1) 1,499,950 9/21/2017 3/22/2018 N/A Short-term Funding EU000A1Z98E5 (1) 1,496,600 10/5/2017 1/11/2018 N/A
Short-term Funding EU000A1Z98F2 (1) 1,423,600 10/19/2017 4/19/2018 N/A Short-term Funding EU000A1Z98G0 (1) 1,496,700 11/9/2017 2/8/2018 N/A Short-term Funding EU000A1Z98H8 (1) 1,493,450 11/23/2017 5/24/2018 N/A Short-term Funding EU000A1Z98J4 (1) 1,497,800 12/7/2017 3/8/2018 N/A
Total 88,929,659
-
(1)Zero-coupon bond (2) Tap issue (3) N-bond with technical ISIN: the ESM issued its first N-bond (Namensschuldverschreibungen) in 2016. N-Bonds are privately placed, long-term funding instruments that are neither centrally cleared nor listed. (4) USD denominated debt securities issued starting with 2017
The following table shows the movements of the debt securities in issue in 2017 and 2018:
(in €’000) 1 January 2017 balance 85,658,968 Issuance during the period 51,736,229 Maturities during the year (48,083,455) Premiums/discounts amortisation (110,659) 31 December 2017 balance 89,201,083
(in €’000) 04
1 January 2018 balance 89,201,083 Issuances during the year 63,821,416 Maturities during the year (54,631,850) Exchange adjustments 118,056 Premiums/discounts amortization (114,746) 31 December 2018 balance 98,393,959
All debt securities in issue at 31 December 2017 and 31 December 2018 are issued under English law as the governing law, except the N-bonds which are issued under German law.
1 1 4 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
13. Other liabilities
On 31 December 2018, the other liabilities were composed of suppliers’ invoices and staff cost related payables
which were not yet settled, amounting to €9.5 million (31 December 2017: €8.5 million).
14. Accruals and deferred income
The following table shows the breakdown of the accruals and deferred income:
(in €’000) 31.12.2018 31.12.2017 Interest payable cash and cash equivalents 24,100 25,776 Interest payable on loans to credit institutions 306 244 Interest payable on debts evidenced by certificates 282,193 251,670 Deferred income on up-front service fee 262,179 224,203 Other (1) 578,845 287,683 Total accruals and deferred income 1,147,623 789,576
-
(1)“Other” represents the spot revaluation and spread amortisation of ongoing derivative transactions (refer to Note 2.15 and 2.5).
As explained in Note 2.3, the amortisation of the up-front service fee is recognised in the profit and loss account
on a linear basis under ‘Interest receivable and similar income on loans to euro area Member States’.
15. Subscribed capital
(in €’000) Subscribed capital Subscribed, uncalled capital Subscribed, called capital 1 January 2017 704,798,700 (624,250,300) 80,548,400
Subscription to the authorised capital - - -
Authorised capital calls - - -
31 December 2017 704,798,700 (624,250,300) 80,548,400
Subscribed, (in €’000) Subscribed capital Subscribed, uncalled capital called capital 1 January 2018 704,798,700 (624,250,300) 80,548,400
Subscription to the authorised capital - - -
Authorised capital calls - - -
31 December 2018 704,798,700 (624,250,300) 80,548,400
On 31 December 2018, the ESM’s shareholders were the 19 euro area Member States. The contribution key for
subscribing to the ESM authorised capital is based on the key as per the Annex 1 of the ESM Treaty.
Latvia joined the ESM on 13 March 2014 and subscribed to an authorised capital of 19,353 shares with a par value of €100,000 each, representing €1.9 billion of subscribed capital of which €221.2 million was called. On 31 December 2018 Latvia had made all instalments for the payment of paid-in shares. Lithuania joined the ESM on 3 February 2015 and subscribed to an authorised capital of 28,634 shares with a par value of €100,000 each,
representing €2.9 billion of subscribed capital, of which €327.2 million was called. On 31 December 2018 Lithuania had made the first four instalments for the payment of paid-in shares in the amount of €261.8 million.
On 31 December 2018, the authorised capital was €704.8 billion (31 December 2017: €704.8 billion), divided into 7,047,987 shares (31 December 2017: 7,047,987 shares), with a par value of €100,000 each, and is split according to the contribution key. Out of the total authorised capital, €624.3 billion (31 December 2017: €624.3 billion) is callable. On 31 December 2018, the called subscribed capital amounted to €80.5 billion (31 December 2017:
€80.5 billion), of which €80.5 billion (31 December 2017: €80.4 billion) is paid.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 1 5
Subscribed capital ESM Members Number of Subscribed capital called and paid 31 December 2018 ESM Key (%) shares (in €’000) (in €’000) Kingdom of Belgium 3.4534 243,397 24,339,700 2,781,680 Federal Republic of Germany 26.9616 1,900,248 190,024,800 21,717,120 Republic of Estonia 0.1847 13,020 1,302,000 148,800 Ireland 1.5814 111,454 11,145,400 1,273,760 Hellenic Republic 2.7975 197,169 19,716,900 2,253,360 Kingdom of Spain 11.8227 833,259 83,325,900 9,522,960 French Republic 20.2471 1,427,013 142,701,300 16,308,720 Italian Republic 17.7917 1,253,959 125,395,900 14,330,960 Republic of Cyprus 0.1949 13,734 1,373,400 156,960 Republic of Latvia 0.2746 19,353 1,935,300 176,960 Republic of Lithuania 0.4063 28,634 2,863,400 196,320 Grand Duchy of Luxembourg 0.2487 17,528 1,752,800 200,320 Malta 0.0726 5,117 511,700 58,480 Kingdom of the Netherlands 5.6781 400,190 40,019,000 4,573,600 Republic of Austria 2.7644 194,838 19,483,800 2,226,720 Portuguese Republic 2.4921 175,644 17,564,400 2,007,360 Republic of Slovenia 0.4247 29,932 2,993,200 342,080 Slovak Republic 0.8184 57,680 5,768,000 659,200 Republic of Finland 1.7852 125,818 12,581,800 1,437,920 Total 100.00 7,047,987 704,798,700 80,482,960
On 31 December 2018, the subscribed capital called but not paid amounted to €0.1 billion and was related to
Lithuania (31 December 2017: €0.2 billion related to Latvia and Lithuania).
There are three different instances when a capital call can be made, in accordance with Article 9 of the ESM
Treaty.
-
i.A general capital call under Article 9(1) of the ESM Treaty concerns payment of the initial capital and an increase of paid-in capital that could be necessary, for example, to raise the lending capacity. To initiate such a call, the Managing Director of the ESM would make a proposal to the Board of Governors outlining the objective of such a call, the amounts and contributions for each shareholder, and a proposed payment schedule. The Board of Governors, by mutual agreement, may call in authorised capital at any time.
-
ii.A capital call under Article 9(2) of the ESM Treaty to replenish paid-in capital could happen for two reasons: 04
ƒ to cover a shortfall due to a non-payment by a beneficiary country and,
ƒ if losses occurring due to other factors reduce the countervalue of the paid-in capital below the threshold of 15% of the maximum lending volume of the ESM.
The Managing Director would make a proposal to the Board of Directors, which would specify the losses incurred and the underlying reasons. A simple majority of the Board of Directors is required to agree to call in capital under these circumstances.
-
iii.An emergency capital call, under Article 9(3) of the ESM Treaty to avoid default of an ESM payment obligation
to its creditors.
The Managing Director has responsibility for making such a capital call to ESM shareholders if there were a risk of default. As stated in the ESM Treaty, the ESM shareholders have irrevocably and unconditionally undertaken to pay on demand such a capital call within seven days of receipt of the demand.
If an ESM Member fails to meet the required payment under a capital call made pursuant to Article 9(2) or (3) of the ESM Treaty, a revised increased capital call would be made to all ESM Members by increasing the contribution rate of the remaining ESM Members on a pro-rata basis, according to Article 25 (2) of the ESM Treaty. When the ESM Member that failed to contribute settles its debt to the ESM, the excess capital is returned to the other ESM Members.
1 1 6 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
16. Reserve fund
As foreseen by Article 24 of the ESM Treaty, the Board of Governors shall establish a reserve fund and, where appropriate, other funds. Without prejudice to the distribution of dividends pursuant to Article 23 of the ESM Treaty, the net income generated by the ESM operations and the proceeds of possible financial sanctions received from the ESM Members under the multilateral surveillance procedure, the excessive deficit procedure and the macroeconomic imbalances procedure established under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) are put aside in a reserve fund, in accordance with Chapter 5 of the ESM Treaty. The primary purpose of
the reserve fund is the absorption of potential losses.
On 15 June 2018, the Board of Governors decided at their annual general meeting to appropriate the net result of 2017 amounting to €68.6 million to the reserve fund. As a result the outstanding balance of the reserve fund as
at 31 December 2018 is €2,064 million (2017: €1,995 million).
17. Interest receivable and similar income on loans and advances to euro area Member States
Interest receivable and similar income on loans and advances to euro area Member States are detailed as follows:
(in €’000) 2018 2017 Interest on loans (1) 1,119,179 877,608
Amortisation loan premium - (9,062)
Amortisation up-front service fee 70,523 59,373
Commitment fee 75 10,845
Total interest and similar income 1,189,777 938,764
-
(1)The interest on loans comprises base rate interest representing the cost of funding of the ESM, the margin and the annual service fee as the ESM Pricing Policy defines them.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 1 7
18. Net interest receivable and similar income on debt securities including fixed-income securities
The geographical breakdown of the interest receivable and similar income on debt securities including fixedincome securities is detailed as follows:
(in €’000) 2018 2017 Euro area issuers 32,728 22,734 Other EU issuers 6,433 8,359 EU supranational organisations 5,318 5,034 Total European Union 44,479 36,127
Other non-EU issuers 16,657 12,089 Other supranational organisations 7,768 3,606 Total outside the European Union 24,425 15,695
Total interest and similar income 68,904 51,822
19. Interest payable and similar charges on cash and cash equivalents
On 31 December 2018, the interest payable and similar charges on cash and cash equivalents represent negative interest paid on the balances with central banks and amounts to €301.3 million (2017: €273.7 million). Since February 2017, the ESM is being charged a negative interest rate (-0.40% per annum) on the cash held at Eurosystem central banks. The relevant ESM Members agreed to compensate the ESM, under certain conditions, for a part of the negative interest charged by their national central banks (refer to Note 27).
20. Other operating income
The EFSF has asked the ESM to provide administrative and other support services to assist it in performing its activities. To formalise this cooperation, the ESM and EFSF entered into a service level agreement from 1 January 2013. Under the agreement’s terms, the ESM is entitled to charge the EFSF service fees to achieve a fair cost-sharing arrangement. For the services during the financial year 2018, the ESM charged the EFSF €32.6 million (2017: €30.9 million), from which €9.8 million had yet to be paid on the balance sheet date (refer to Note 10).
In 2018, the internal tax on salaries retained from staff members amounts to €1.7 million (2017: €1.7 million). 04
In 2017, the cumulated internal tax on salaries retained from staff members amounting to €5.0 million for the years 2013 to 2016 and €1.7 million for 2017 has been transferred to “Other operating income”. Salaries are recorded on a gross basis within Staff costs. In accordance with Article 36(5) of the ESM Treaty, such internal tax is for the benefit of the ESM.
21. Net profit on financial operations
Net profit on financial operations is detailed as follows:
(in €’000) 2018 2017 Net realised result of sales of debt securities 44,320 27,032
Net foreign exchange result 13 142
Total net result on financial operations 44,333 27,174
The net realised result of sales of debt securities reflects gains and losses realised at the date of derecognition of the respective financial assets. Up to that date, the debt securities are carried at fair value and unrealised gains and losses are recorded in the equity within the fair value reserve.
1 1 8 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
22. Staff costs
Staff costs are detailed as follows:
(in €’000) 2018 2017 Salaries (1) and allowances 23,419 22,841 Social security costs 1,088 1,251 Pension costs 7,924 7,074 Total staff costs 32,431 31,166
-
(1)Of which €1.7 million (2017: €1.6 million) relates to the ESM Management Board members, including €0.36 million (2017: €0.36 million) to the ESM Managing Director.
The ESM employed 179 persons on 31 December 2018 (174 on 31 December 2017).
In addition to its own employees, the ESM has expenses for employees seconded from other International Financial Institutions, as well as interim and temporary staff hired from external agencies. The related costs amount to €1.3 million for the 2018 financial year (2017: €1.2 million) and are accounted for as ‘Other administrative expenses’ (refer to Note 23).
23. Other administrative expenses
Other administrative expenses consist of fees paid for professional services and miscellaneous operating
expenses and are detailed as follows:
(in €’000) 2018 2017 Outsourced services (mainly IT, HR and accounting services) 9,820 8,456
Advisory services 7,948 4,815
Rental and related services 3,903 3,429
Treasury related services 1,542 1,298
Interim and secondment fees (Note 22) 1,304 1,219
Rating agencies fees 418 385
Legal services 639 1,269
IT services 3,661 2,742
Other services 4,533 5,406
Total other administrative expenses 33,768 29,019
24. Extraordinary income
The extraordinary income, totaling €242.5 million, is mainly composed of the amounts received from the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic, to compensate the ESM for a part of the negative interest charged on the cash held at their national central banks during 2017. These represent €128.9 million and €86.7 million
respectively.
In accordance with the article 24(2) of the ESM Treaty, the ESM receives the proceeds of the financial sanctions paid by ESM Members. These are imposed under the multilateral surveillance procedure, under the excessive
deficit procedure and under the macroeconomic imbalances procedures established under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The ESM also receives the financial sanctions imposed by the Court of Justice pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance (TSCG) on euro area Member States. These proceeds are recorded as extraordinary income and put aside in the reserve fund.
Accordingly, the ESM shall receive an amount of €26.8 million following a decision in May 2018 from the Council of the European Union imposing a fine on Austria.
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 1 9
In 2017, the extraordinary income of €18.93 million was related to an amount that the ESM received from the
European Commission, following a final sentence of the Court of Justice in December 2017 5 , which confirmed the Council implementing decision imposing a fine on Spain.
The financial sanctions imposed on Austria by Council implementing decision (EU) 2018/818 on 28 May 2018 and on Spain by Council implementing decision (EU) 2015/1289 on 13 July 2015 are sanctions pursuant to Article 8(1) Regulation (EU) No. 1173/2011. Such sanctions are collected by the European Commission and are assigned to the ESM. 6
25. Off-balance commitments
The off-balance sheet commitments represent the undisbursed part of the financial assistance programme to
Greece and amounts to nil after Greece officially concluded its three-year ESM financial assistance programme with a successful exit during 2018 (2017: €45.8 billion).
26. Derivatives
The ESM uses derivatives for risk management purposes only, as described in Note 2.5. Since 2015, the ESM has been entering into foreign exchange derivative transactions such as foreign exchange swaps and foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge the currency risk related to short-term non-euro denominated investments. Starting from 2017, the ESM has entered into interest rate swaps and cross-currency asset swaps for the purpose of hedging interest rate risk on euro and non-euro denominated issued debt, as well as euro and non-euro denominated investments.
All derivatives transactions are booked at notional value as off-balance sheet items at the date of the transaction.
On 31 December 2018, the derivative financial instruments had a maximum maturity up to 30 years (2017: maximum maturity up to 30 years) and were concluded with euro area central banks, international financial institutions or commercial banks.
The following table discloses the details of result on derivative contracts during the year ending on 31 December 2018.
Interest receivable Interest payable and
(in €’000) and similar income similar charges Net result 04
Interest result on interest rate swaps (1) 136,062 (446,803) (310,741) Interest result on cross-currency asset
swaps 82,166 (54,745) 27,421
Up-front payments on cross-currency asset
swaps 34,589 (1,525) 33,064
Spread on foreign exchange swaps 7,259 (6,229) 1,030
Spread on foreign exchange forwards (876) 882 6
Total 259,200 (508,420) (249,220)
-
(1)The net result from the IRS executed to reduce Greece’s interest rate risk is passed through to Greece. (Refer to Note 3.6.1.1).
5 ECLI:EU:C:2017:982
6 Cf. Article 10 of Regulation 1173/2011.
1 2 0 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
The following table discloses the details of result on derivative contracts during the year ending on 31 December 2017:
Interest receivable Interest payable and similar (in €’000) and similar income charges Net result Interest result on interest rate swaps (1) 42,814 (141,797) (98,983) Interest result on cross-currency asset
swaps 11,819 (11,114) 705
Up-front payments on cross-currency
asset swaps 10,137 (36) 10,101
Spread on foreign exchange swaps 5,881 (6,548) (667)
Spread on foreign currency forwards 688 (447) 241
Total 71,339 (159,942) (88,603)
-
(1)The net result from the IRS executed to reduce Greece’s interest rate risk is passed through to Greece. (Refer to Note 3.6.1.1).
The realised part included in ‘Interest receivable and similar income’ amounts to €188.7 million (2017: €25.1 million), while for ‘Interest payable and similar charges’ this represents €401.0 million (2017: €22.4 million).
27. Related - party transactions
Key management
The ESM has identified members of the Board of Governors, Board of Directors and the Management Board as key management personnel.
The members of the Board of Governors and the Board of Directors were not entitled to remuneration during the period.
Transactions with shareholders
The ESM granted loans to Spain, Cyprus and Greece, which are also ESM shareholders, as disclosed in more detail in Note 6. In the course of its investment activity, the ESM purchases debt securities issued by its shareholders. Such securities are reported as ‘Debt securities including fixed-income securities’ on the balance sheet.
In 2018, the ESM received payments from France and Germany to compensate for the negative interest charged on the cash balances held with their respective national central banks (refer to Note 24). In January 2018, €86.7 million was received from France and in August 2018 €128.9 million was received from Germany. In 2017, both
Member states expressed their willingness to compensate the ESM up to the amount of negative interest charged by their national central banks with the intention to limit the negative implications on ESM’s paid-in capital. The transfers were made under certain conditions and following parliament approval. Both ESM Members made
similar transfers in January and February 2019, subsequent to year end (refer to Note 29).
Transactions with the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF)
The EFSF is a public limited liability company (Société Anonyme) incorporated under Luxembourg law on 7 June 2010 following decisions taken by the euro area Member States on 9 May 2010 within the framework of the Ecofin Council. The EFSF’s mandate is to safeguard financial stability in Europe by providing financial assistance to euro area Member States within the framework of a macro-economic adjustment programme.
The EFSF was created as a temporary rescue mechanism. In accordance with its Articles of Association, the EFSF will be dissolved and liquidated when all financial assistance provided to euro area Member States and
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 2 1
all funding instruments issued by the EFSF have been repaid in full. As of 1 July 2013, the EFSF may no longer engage in new financing programmes or enter into new loan facility agreements.
The EFSF has asked the ESM to provide certain administrative services and other support services to facilitate the performance of its activities. To formalise this cooperation, the two organisations have entered into a service level agreement. In line with the terms of this agreement, the ESM charged the EFSF €32.6 million for the financial year 2018 (2017: €30.9 million), from which €9.8 million had not yet been paid at balance sheet date (refer to Note 10). The ESM recognised these amounts as other operating income in the profit and loss account.
Transactions with the Chairperson of the ESM Board of Governors
In October 2017, the ESM appointed Jeroen Dijsselbloem as strategic advisor to the ESM Managing Director. Mr
Dijsselbloem held this position as an external service provider until the end of his term as Eurogroup President on
13 January 2018. During this period, he remained Chairperson of the ESM Board of Governors. Mr Dijsselbloem was remunerated during this time in line with the ESM’s standard contracts for external service providers until the end of his term on 13 January 2018.
28. Audit fee
The total fees accrued in 2018 by the ESM to Ernst&Young, Société Anonyme are presented as follows:
(in €’000) 2018 2017 Audit fees 249 249 Audit related fees 131 205 Total Audit fees 380 454
In 2018 and 2017, the external auditors provided the ESM with audit-related services in relation with the US-dollar denominated bond issuance.
29. Events after the reporting period
On 2 January 2019 and on 4 February 2019, the ESM received €100 million from the French Republic and €135.4 million from the Federal Republic of Germany, following a political commitment to compensate the ESM for negative
interest paid on the cash balances held with their respective national central banks, as explained in Note 27. 04
These amounts will be recorded as extraordinary income in 2019 (refer to Note 2.19).
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 2 3
05 External auditor’s report on the 2018 financial statements
To the Board of Governors of the
European Stability Mechanism
Report on the audit of the financial statements are further described in the « Responsibilities of the
“réviseur d’entreprises agréé” for the audit of the financial statements » section of our report. We are
Opinion also independent of the Entity in accordance with the
International Ethics Standards Board for Account We have audited the financial statements of Euroants’ Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants pean Stability Mechanism (the “Entity” or “ESM”), (“IESBA Code”) as adopted for Luxembourg by the which comprise the balance sheet as at 31 Decem CSSF together with the ethical requirements that are ber 2018, the profit and loss account, the statement relevant to our audit of the financial statements, and of changes in equity and the statement of cash flows have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities under for the year then ended, and the notes to the finanthose ethical requirements. We believe that the audit cial statements, including a summary of significant evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriaccounting policies. ate to provide a basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements
give a true and fair view of the financial posi Key audit matters
tion of the Entity as at 31 December 2018, and of the results of its operations and its cash flows for the Key audit matters are those matters that, in our proyear then ended in accordance with the general prinfessional judgment, were of most significance in our ciples of the Directive 86/635/EEC of the Council of audit of the financial statements of the current period. the European Communities of 8 December 1986 on These matters were addressed in the context of the the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in
banks and other financial institutions, as amended forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a 05
by Directive 2001/65/EC of 27 September 2001, by separate opinion on these matters. Directive 2003/51/EC of 18 June 2003 and by Directive 2006/46/EC of 14 June 2006 (the ”Directives”). Impairment of loans and advances
Basis for opinion As at 31 December 2018, the loans and advances to
euro area Member States amounted to EUR 89.9 bil We conducted our audit in accordance with EU Reglion and related to financial assistance granted to ulation N° 537/2014, the Law of 23 July 2016 on Spain, Cyprus and Greece in line with ESM’s mission the audit profession (the “Law of 23 July 2016”) and to provide financial assistance to euro area countries with International Standards on Auditing (“ISAs”) as experiencing or threatened by severe financing probadopted for Luxembourg by the “Commission de Surlems. These loans were granted to recapitalise banks veillance du Secteur Financier” (“CSSF”). Our responin Spain, and as part of a macroeconomic adjustment sibilities under those Regulation, laws and standards programme in the case of Cyprus and Greece. For the
1 2 4 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
year ending 31 December 2018, no impairment has ƒ the testing of assumptions underlying judgments been recorded by ESM on these outstanding loans. made by the Management when an impairment event occurs on expected cash flows and esti We considered this as a key audit matter as ESM mated recovery from any underlying collateral; applies complex judgments with respect to the estimation of the amount and timing of the future cash ƒ the testing of a sample of loans to form our own flows when determining the necessity to record or not assessment as to whether impairment events an impairment loss on the loans granted. have occurred and to assess whether impairment was identified and recorded in a timely manner, To assess the required impairment allowance and in where required; accordance with article 13(6) of the ESM Treaty - the ESM shall establish an appropriate warning system ƒ the reading and assessment of the related conto ensure that it receives any repayments due by the tents of the major internal committees minutes; ESM Member under the stability support in a timely manner - ESM assesses individually each loan and ƒ Checking that reimbursements [and waivers advance granted to the beneficiary ESM Members on granted] are made in accordance with the terms a regular basis through the analysis of the main foland conditions agreed; lowing indicators of the beneficiary country: ƒ Reconciling amounts disbursed with the loan ƒ the liquidity situation of the sovereign; agreements and ensuring that loans granted to ESM Members are within the limit of commitƒ the market access; ments approved by the governing bodies of ESM.
ƒ the long-term sustainability of public debt;
Responsibilities of the Board of Directors and ƒ the banking prospects, whenever relevant to of those charged with governance for the
assess repayment flows; financial statements
ƒ the review of the medium-term economic and The Board of Directors is responsible for the preparafinancial outlook; tion and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with the general principles of the Direcƒ
the identification of default events. tive 86/635/EEC of the Council of the European Communities of 8 December 1986 on the annual accounts
The determination of the necessity to record an and consolidated accounts of banks and other finanimpairment will be based on the identification of cial institutions, as amended by Directive 2001/65/EC impairment events and judgments to estimate the of 27 September 2001, by Directive 2003/51/EC of 18 impairment against specific loans and advances. June 2003 and by Directive 2006/46/EC of 14 June 2006 (the ”Directives”), and for such internal control Refer to the notes 2 and 6 to the financial statements. as the Board of Directors determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to How the matter was addressed in our audit fraud or error.
We assessed the design and implementation, and In preparing the financial statements, the Board of tested the operating effectiveness of the key controls Directors is responsible for assessing the entity’s over ESM’s processes for establishing and monitoring ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, specific impairment estimation. This includes: as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless ƒ the testing of the entity level controls over the the Board of Directors either intends to liquidate the process, including the review and approval of the Entity or to cease operations, or has no realistic alterassumptions made by the Management; native but to do so.
ƒ the testing of the quarterly Early Warning System Those charged with governance are responsible for reports issued per country and checking if impairoverseeing the Entity’s financial reporting process.
ment recommendations have been adequately applied;
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 2 5
Responsibilities of the “réviseur d’entreprises statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, agréé” for the audit of the financial statements to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based
on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of The objectives of our audit are to obtain reasonable our report of the “réviseur d’entreprises agréé”. assurance about whether the financial statements as However, future events or conditions may cause a whole are free from material misstatement, whether the Entity to cease to continue as a going concern. due to fraud or error, and to issue a report of the “réviseur d’entreprises agréé” that includes our opinion. Reaƒ Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and sonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is content of the financial statements, including the not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance disclosures, and whether the financial statements with EU Regulation N° 537/2014, the Law of 23 July represent the underlying transactions and events 2016 and with the ISAs as adopted for Luxembourg by in a manner that achieves fair presentation. the CSSF will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or We communicate with those charged with governerror and are considered material if, individually or in ance regarding, among other matters, the planned the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to scope and timing of the audit and significant audit influence the economic decisions of users taken on the findings, including any significant deficiencies in interbasis of these financial statements. nal control that we identify during our audit.
As part of an audit in accordance with EU Regulation We also provide those charged with governance with
N° 537/2014, the Law of 23 July 2016 and with ISAs a statement that we have complied with relevant ethas adopted for Luxembourg by the CSSF, we exercise ical requirements regarding independence, and to professional judgment and maintain professional communicate with them all relationships and other skepticism throughout the audit. We also: matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on
our independence, and where applicable, related safeƒ Identify and assess the risks of material misguards.
statement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit From the matters communicated with those charged procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain with governance, we determine those matters that audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate were of most significance in the audit of the financial to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not statements of the current period and are therefore the detecting a material misstatement resulting from key audit matters. We describe these matters in our fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, report unless law or regulation precludes public disas fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional closure about the matter. omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
Report on other legal and regulatory ƒ Obtain an understanding of internal control relerequirements
vant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, We have been appointed as “réviseur d’entreprises but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion agréé” by the Board of Governors on 15 June 2017 and on the effectiveness of the Entity’s internal control. the duration of our uninterrupted engagement, including previous renewals and reappointments, is 2 years.
ƒ Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting poli 05
cies used and the reasonableness of accounting We confirm that the audit opinion is consistent with the estimates and related disclosures made by the additional report to the audit committee or equivalent. Board of Directors. We confirm that the prohibited non-audit services
ƒ Conclude on the appropriateness of Board of referred to in EU Regulation No 537/2014 were not
Directors’ use of the going concern basis of provided and that we remained independent of the accounting and, based on the audit evidence Entity in conducting the audit. obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast sig Ernst & Young nificant doubt on the Entity’s ability to continue as Société anonyme a going concern. If we conclude that a material Cabinet de révision agréé uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our report of the “réviseur d’entreprises Bernard Lhoest | Papa Saliou Diop agréé” to the related disclosures in the financial Luxembourg, March 26, 2019
2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T | 1 2 7
06 Report of the Board of Auditors on the 2018 financial statements
Luxembourg, 26 March 2019
The Board of Auditors of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) was set up pursuant to Article 30 of the Treaty establishing the ESM and Article 24 of the ESM By-Laws. The Board of Auditors is independent from the Board of Directors and its members are appointed directly by the Board of Governors. 1
This Board of Auditors’ report in respect of the financial statements is addressed to the Board of Governors in accordance with Article 23 (2) (d) of the ESM By-Laws. It is delivered in respect of the financial statements of the ESM for the year ended 31 December 2018.
The Board of Auditors notes that based on its own work and considering the work of the external auditor, to the best of its judgment, no material matters have come to its attention that would prevent it from recommending that the Board of Governors approve the ESM financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2018.
On behalf of the Board of Auditors
Kevin Cardiff Chairperson
06
1 The Board of Auditors carries out independent audits of regularity, compliance, performance, and risk management of the ESM, inspects the ESM accounts, and monitors and reviews the ESM’s internal and external audit processes and their results. Information on the audit work
of the Board of Auditors, its audit findings, conclusions and recommendations for the year ended 31 December 2018 will be included in the annual report, to be prepared in accordance with Article 24 (6) of the ESM By-Laws and submitted to the Board of Governors.
1 2 8 | E U R O P E A N S T A B I L I T Y M E C H A N I S M
Acronyms and abbreviations
ALM Asset and Liability Management HCAP Hellenic Corporation of Assets and Participations
BoA Board of Auditors HFSF Hellenic Financial Stability Fund
BoD Board of Directors IFI International financial institution
BoG Board of Governors IMF International Monetary Fund
CCB Cyprus Cooperative Bank ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives
CDS Credit default swap Association
CPI Consumer price inflation NPL Non-performing loan
ECB European Central Bank PSPP Public Sector Purchase Programme
EFSF European Financial Stability Facility RCSA Risk and Control Self-Assessment
EMU Economic and Monetary Union SRB Single Resolution Board
ESM European Stability Mechanism SRF Single Resolution Fund
GDP Gross domestic product SSA Sovereign, Supranational and Agency
GDPR General Data Protection Regulation TRSA Top Risk Self-Assessment
GLF Greek Loan Facility
EURO AREA NON-EURO AREA
COUNTRY CODE COUNTRY NAME COUNTRY CODE COUNTRY NAME
BE Belgium US United States DE Germany EE Estonia IE Ireland EL Greece ES Spain FR France IT Italy CY Cyprus LV Latvia LT Lithuania LU Luxembourg MT Malta NL Netherlands AT Austria PT Portugal SI Slovenia SK Slovakia FI Finland
2018
ANNU
AL REPOR
T
EUROPEAN STABILITY MECHANISM
6a Circuit de la Foire Internationale
L-1347 LUXEMBOURG
Tel: (+352) 260 962 0
EUROPEAN
info@esm.europa.lu www.esm.europa.eu
ST
ABILI
TY
MEC
HANISM
Print ISBN 978-92-95085-59-6 ISSN 2314-9493 doi:10.2852/53320 DW-AA-19-001-EN-C
PDF ISBN 978-92-95085-58-9 ISSN 2443-8138 doi:10.2852/427922 DW-AA-19-001-EN-N