Annexes to COM(2016)5 - Response to the Report of the High Level Expert Group on the Ex Post Evaluation of the Seventh Framework Programme

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

Annex 15 of the annexed Staff Working Document.

(8)

Further information, including on FP7's shortcomings, can be found in the annexed Staff Working Document. Further details about the HLEG recommendations see http://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/index_en.cfm?pg=home . The recommendations on the FP7 Euratom programmes and the Commission's response are annexed to this Communication.

(9)

See Communication 2014/C 188/02.

(10)

  http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/guides/synergy/synergies_en.pdf .

(11)

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5801_en.htm.

(12)

Commission Staff Working Document "Better regulations for innovation-driven investment at EU level", SWD(2015)298final.

(13)

Study on "Budgetary impact of the changes in the cost calculation regime in FP7 (EC and Euratom) as compared to FP6 (EC and Euratom) and its effects on the administrative burden for participants", 2015.

(14)

     See Article 38 of the grant agreement for projects funded under Horizon 2020.

(15)

http://ec.europa.eu/research/mariecurieactions/about-msca/actions/researcher-night/index_en.htm.

(16)

  http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/newsroom/551

(17)

To date, 54% of all FP7 scientific publications are open access.