Considerations on COM(2021)484 - EU position on modifications to Appendices 2, 2A and 5 to Annex II to the Trade Agreement with Colombia, Peru, and Ecuador

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

 
 
table>(1)The Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Colombia, Peru and Ecuador, of the other part (‘the Agreement’) was signed by the Union on 26 June 2012 in accordance with Council Decision 2012/735/EU (1) as regards Colombia and Peru, and on 11 November 2016 in accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2016/2369 (2) as regards Ecuador. The Agreement, pursuant to Article 330(3) thereof, has been applied provisionally since 1 March 2013 between the Union and Peru, since 1 August 2013 between the Union and Colombia, and since 1 January 2017 between the Union and Ecuador.
(2)Pursuant to Article 13(2), point (g)(iii), of the Agreement, the Trade Committee may modify the specific rules of origin established in Annex II (Concerning the Definition of the Concept of ‘Originating products’ and Methods of Administrative Cooperation) to the Agreement.

(3)The Trade Committee, by written procedure which is expected to take place before the end of 2021, is to adopt a Decision modifying Appendix 2 (List of working or processing required to be carried out on non-originating materials in order that the product manufactured can obtain originating status), Appendix 2A (Addendum to the list of working or processing required to be carried out on non-originating materials in order that the product manufactured can obtain originating status) and Appendix 5 (Products to which subparagraph (b) of the Declaration of the European Union concerning Article 5 in relation to originating products from Colombia, Ecuador and Peru applies) to Annex II. Those Appendices are based on the Harmonised System (HS) 2007. The product specific rules of origin contained in those Appendices are to be aligned with the updated HS as applicable from 2017. Such alignment would include the changes introduced by the HS 2012 and the HS 2017, to the product specific rules of Appendices 2, 2A and 5. For reasons of clarity, taking into account the number of amendments that need to be made in the Appendices, the Appendices are to be replaced in their entirety.

(4)It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union’s behalf in the Trade Committee with regard to the modifications to Appendices 2, 2A and 5 to Annex II to the Agreement, as the Decision of the Trade Committee will have legal effect in the Union.

(5)The position of the Union within the Trade Committee should therefore be based on the draft Decision of the Trade Committee,