Considerations on COM(2020)393 - EU position within the EU-Turkey Association Council on amending the definition of 'originating products' and methods of administrative cooperation for agricultural products

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

 
 
table>(1)Decision No 1/98 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 25 February 1998 on the trade regime for agricultural products (1) (‘the Decision’) was concluded by the Union by Council Decision 98/223/EC and entered into force on 1 January 1998.
(2)The Decision includes Protocol 3 concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation (‘Protocol 3’). Protocol 3 was replaced by a new protocol by Decision No 3/2006 of the EC-Turkey Association Council (2). Pursuant to Article 39 of Protocol 3, the Association Council may decide to amend the provisions of Protocol 3.

(3)The Association Council will adopt a decision amending the Agreement by replacing Protocol 3 (‘decision’) during its next meeting, before the end of 2023.

(4)It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union’s behalf within the Association Council, as the decision will have binding legal effects in the Union.

(5)The Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin (‘the Convention’) was concluded by the Union by Council Decision 2013/94/EU (3) and entered into force in relation to the Union on 1 May 2012. It lays down provisions on the origin of goods traded under relevant bilateral free trade agreements concluded between the Contracting Parties to the Convention, which apply without prejudice to the principles laid down in those bilateral agreements.

(6)Article 6 of the Convention provides that each Contracting Party is to take appropriate measures to ensure that the Convention is effectively applied. To that effect, the decision will introduce a dynamic reference to the Convention in Protocol 3, so as to refer always to the latest version of the Convention in force.

(7)Discussions on amending the Convention have resulted in a new set of modernised and more flexible rules of origin to be incorporated into the Convention. Pending the conclusion and entry into force of the amendment of the Convention, the Union and the Republic of Turkey have agreed to apply as soon as possible an alternative set of rules of origin based on those of the amended Convention, which may be used bilaterally as alternative rules of origin to those laid down in the Convention (‘Transitional rules’). To that effect, the decision will also provide for the Transitional rules.

(8)In the cumulation zone constituted by the EFTA States, the Faroe Islands, the Union, the Republic of Turkey, the participants in the Stabilisation and Association Process, the Republic of Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine, the possibility of using movement certificates EUR.1 or origin declarations instead of movement certificates EUR-MED or origin declarations EUR-MED, as a derogation from the provisions of the Convention applicable to diagonal cumulation among those participants, should be maintained.

(9)The position of the Union within the Association Council should therefore be based on the draft decision,