Considerations on COM(2019)413 - EU position at the third meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Minamata Convention on Mercury as regards a Decision establishing thresholds for mercury waste - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2019)413 - EU position at the third meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Minamata Convention on Mercury as regards a ... |
|---|---|
| document | COM(2019)413  |
| date | November 21, 2019 |
| (2) | Pursuant to Decision MC‐1/1 on Rules of Procedures adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention at its first meeting, the Parties are to make every effort to reach agreement on all matters of substance by consensus. |
| (3) | The Conference of the Parties to the Convention, during its third meeting on 25‐29 November 2019 (COP3), is expected to adopt a Decision (‘the proposed Decision’) on thresholds for mercury waste, as referred to in Article 11(2) of the Convention, which would, as a result, define the scope of application of Article 11 (mercury wastes) of the Convention. Mercury waste that would fall under Article 11(2) of the Convention is to be subject to environmentally sound management by virtue of Article 11(3) of the Convention. Any threshold set pursuant to Article 11(2) of the Convention, including for waste contaminated with mercury or mercury compounds, should therefore be established at a level ensuring that all such waste displaying hazards for human health or to the environment is subject to environmentally sound management. |
| (4) | It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken, on behalf of the Union, at COP3, as the proposed Decision, if adopted, will have legal effects since the Parties to the Convention will have to take measures to implement it at national or regional levels, or both. |
| (5) | The Union contributed significantly to the development of the waste provisions of the Convention and to the intersessional expert work launched by Decision MC‐2/2 adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention at its second meeting, which has led to the proposed Decision. |
| (6) | The Union acquis already requires that all mercury waste that is referred to in Article 11(2) of the Convention be managed without endangering human health and without harming the environment irrespective of the mercury content of such waste. |
| (7) | The Union should only support the adoption of a Decision at COP3 that is consistent with the Union acquis, |